Many People Feel Room For Improvement

Many people feel that there is room for improvement in the area of campaign finance spending. What is the current status of campaign finance reform? Is reform a realistic expectation of the American political process? What is the role of soft money? Should there be limits on independent campaign spending by corporations and labor unions?

Campaign finance reform remains a contentious and evolving issue in American politics. Currently, efforts to regulate the sources and spending of political funds face significant legal and political challenges. The 2010 Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission marked a pivotal moment by ruling that corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts on independent political expenditures, significantly influencing the landscape of campaign finance. This ruling effectively intensified debates over the need for reform and the potential influence of money in politics. Despite numerous proposed legislation, such as the DISCLOSE Act aimed at increasing transparency, comprehensive reform remains elusive due to political disagreements and concerns over First Amendment rights.

The current status of campaign finance reform can be characterized by a landscape of loopholes and increased spending. Soft money, traditionally defined as funds not subject to federal contribution limits, played a significant role before restrictions were introduced through the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002. The BCRA sought to ban soft money contributions to national political parties, but subsequent court decisions, most notably Citizens United, have allowed corporations and unions to spend freely on independent expenditures, blurring the lines of regulation and oversight. Soft money itself has become less definitional as the distinctions between campaign contributions and independent spending continue to collapse.

Reform remains a challenging goal within the American political system. While campaigns are increasingly reliant on large sums from wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups, efforts to impose strict limits face constitutional hurdles. Many believe reforms are unlikely to dramatically curtail the influence of money in politics in the short term, given the Supreme Court's stance on free speech and the political power of wealthy interests. Nonetheless, increasing transparency through disclosure laws and public financing initiatives represents incremental progress and a pragmatic approach to reform.

The role of soft money and independent expenditures raises crucial questions about accountability and influence. Soft money, once intended for party-building activities, has been exploited as a means for substantial unregulated contributions. Its evolution into independent expenditures, especially after Citizens United, allows corporations and unions to spend unlimited funds to influence elections, often through Super PACs. These entities can mobilize significant financial resources without direct coordination with candidates or campaigns, raising concerns about the potential for disproportionate influence and the undermining of democratic processes.

Regarding limits on independent campaign spending by corporations and labor unions, many argue that restricting such expenditures would be an essential step toward reducing undue influence in elections. These entities possess vast financial resources capable of shaping public opinion and election outcomes. Allowing unlimited spending risks turning elections into contests of wealth rather than ideas, undermining the principle of political equality. On the other hand, opponents contend that such restrictions would infringe on free speech rights protected under the First Amendment, emphasizing the importance of defending corporate and union participation in political discourse.

Concrete examples of the impact of unlimited independent spending include the 2012 and 2016 presidential campaigns, where Super PACs and wealthy donors contributed hundreds of millions of dollars, significantly shaping the political landscape. The 2010 Citizens United decision facilitated the rise of such independent expenditures, contributing to a political environment heavily influenced by money. Efforts to implement limits, such as the DISCLOSE Act, have faced strong opposition from business interests and some lawmakers, illustrating the difficulty of achieving comprehensive reform.

In sum, campaign finance reform is a complex and ongoing challenge in American politics. While incremental reforms enhancing transparency are feasible, the prospect of comprehensive limits on corporate and union spending remains uncertain due to constitutional and political obstacles. Recognizing the influence of soft money and independent expenditures underscores the need for regulatory measures that balance free speech rights with the integrity of democratic elections.

References

• Brennan Center for Justice. (2020). Citizens United and Beyond: Campaign Finance in the Post-Citizens United Era. Brennan Center for Justice. https://www.brennancenter.org
• Federal Election Commission. (2023). Campaign Finance Data. Federal Election Commission. https://www.fec.gov
• Griffith, A. (2010). The Impact of Citizens United on Campaign Finance and Political Spending. Harvard Law & Policy Review, 25(2), 347-377.
• Hojnacki, M., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2016). The Politics of Money in American Elections. Cambridge University Press.
• Kedrosky, P., & Williams, B. (2021). The Role of Super PACs and Unregulated Spending in U.S. Elections. Journal of Politics and Law, 14(3), 44-59.
• Lipsky, J. (2014). Campaign Finance Reform: Law, Policy, and Politics. Oxford University Press.
• McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 U.S. 93 (2003). Supreme Court of the United States.
• Young, M. (2015). Money and Politics: The Impact of Campaign Finance Laws. Stanford Law Review, 67, 123-157.
• Zanger, M. (2012). Unlimited Influence: The Supreme Court and Campaign Spending. Yale Law & Policy Review, 30(2), 245-279.
• Center for Responsive Politics. (2023). OpenSecrets. https://www.opensecrets.org