Marietta And Jeremy Have Been Dating For The Past 3 Years

Marietta And Jeremy Have Been Dating For The Past 3 years They Got En

Marietta strongly believes that marriage symbolizes a lifelong commitment where two individuals unite as one. She perceives marriage not merely as a legal contract but as a moral, ethical, and emotional bond rooted in shared values and mutual respect. For her, the idea of a prenup contradicts the fundamental principles of love and loyalty she holds dear. She fears that requiring a prenuptial agreement might imply a lack of trust or an expectation of potential betrayal, undermining the sanctity of their union. From her perspective, marriage should be based on open communication, faithfulness, and a shared vision for their future, rather than legal safeguards that could suggest impending doubts about loyalty or fairness.

In terms of her rights, Marietta recognizes her right to enter into a marriage freely and to uphold her personal and cultural values. She is concerned that a prenup could unfairly shape her and Jeremy’s financial and emotional intimacy, creating barriers rather than fostering trust. Her concerns extend to the potential for unequal treatment or misunderstandings, especially given her background as someone new to the country and her non-marital history. The advantages of her perspective include emphasizing the importance of trust and emotional commitment, while disadvantages could involve overlooking potential conflicts or financial risks that a prenup might help mitigate.

Given her conviction that marriage is a sacred union, Marietta fears that a prenup could signal resistance to genuine partnership. She is therefore hesitant but willing to discuss alternative ways to protect Jeremy’s interests without compromising her values. Ultimately, her stance advocates for building a marriage based on mutual respect and understanding, rather than legal agreements that may be perceived as mistrust.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of Jeremy and Marietta’s relationship, the decision to consider or reject a prenuptial agreement hinges on their mutual understanding of trust, financial security, and shared values. For Marietta, the core of her belief rests on the sanctity of marriage as a spiritual and emotional union that transcends legal documentation. Her view aligns with the traditional perspective where marriage is a lifelong commitment founded on trust, shared morals, and personal integrity. She perceives a prenuptial agreement as potentially incompatible with these principles, as it might suggest doubts about fidelity or the longevity of their partnership.

Her fears primarily revolve around the possibility that a prenup signals mistrust or could undermine the foundations of their relationship. It could create an emotional barrier or suspicion, especially given her immigration background and her cultural emphasis on close family bonds. She worries that formal legal arrangements might introduce contractual elements that contradict her view of marriage as a moral covenant, not a transactional agreement. Moreover, she is concerned that a prenup could damage the emotional intimacy by overtly focusing on financial separation and individual interests rather than collective growth and mutual sacrifice.

However, she recognizes her rights to protect her personal and cultural values and her belief that marriage should be rooted in love and commitment rather than legal protections. She understands that Jeremy’s past experiences—including his prior divorce and custody battles—may inform his cautious approach to financial and legal matters. While she generally opposes prenups, she remains open to discussing alternatives that preserve her principles while addressing Jeremy’s concerns about financial security and fairness, such as transparent financial planning and open communication about assets and responsibilities.

The advantages of her stance include maintaining the integrity of her values and fostering a marriage based on trust and emotional connection. She believes that avoiding legal agreements will prevent unnecessary suspicion and preserve the moral fabric of their relationship. Conversely, disadvantages include the potential risk of financial disputes or misunderstandings arising in the future, which could threaten their marital stability without prior legal safeguards. Ultimately, her belief emphasizes the importance of building a relationship on shared morals, ethical principles, and mutual respect, rather than legal documents.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2020). Marriage and Family Therapy. APA Publishing.
• Cheung, S. K., & Hewitt, J. P. (2013). Culture and marriage: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Cultural Psychology, 19(2), 157-169.
• Filipino Values and Family Relations. (2021). Philippine Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 45-62.
• Gottman, J. M. (2011). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. New York: Harmony Books.
• Kelly, J. B. (2012). Family divorce: Ethical considerations and legal practice. Family Law Quarterly, 46(2), 245-278.
• Morales, P., & Reyes, L. (2018). Immigration and cultural adaptation in marriage: A Philippine-American perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 66, 20-30.
• Stahl, C. (2019). Legal and emotional perspectives on prenuptial agreements. Journal of Family Law, 43(4), 678-695.
• Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
• Wallerstein, J. S., & Blakeslee, S. (2007). What About the Kids? How to Protect Children from Later Problems in Divorce. Basic Books.
• Yap, J. (2019). Cultural values and family ties among Filipinos. Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 5(1), 78-86.