Marijuana Was Decriminalized In Canada In October 2018 ✓ Solved

Marijuana was decriminalized in Canada in October 2018. Since th

Marijuana was decriminalized in Canada in October 2018. Since that time, many Canadian police departments have implemented policies regarding officials using marijuana that would probably shock many Americans. For example, the Vancouver Police Department says that it will not impose any restrictions on their officers for using marijuana while off-duty. The only policy they will enforce is that all officers must be fit for duty when they report to work. It essentially holds them to the same standards as after-hours alcohol consumption.

Changes are happening in the United States as well. In Atlanta, Georgia, which is a state where marijuana use is still illegal, the Atlanta Police Department will no longer ask applicants if they have smoked marijuana and consider its use as a factor in eligibility to join the force. They claim that they have lost too many qualified candidates when asking them about marijuana smoking. Share your opinions, from both the perspective of a criminal justice administrator working in a state where marijuana use has been decriminalized and from the perspective of a private citizen, on whether criminal justice personnel (in states where it is legal) should be allowed to use marijuana while off-duty. Explain the rationale for your opinions.

Paper For Above Instructions

As the conversation surrounding marijuana legalization continues to evolve, the perspectives from both sides of the debate become increasingly important to articulate. In Canada, the decriminalization of marijuana has created a unique environment in which law enforcement officers have begun to adapt their policies accordingly. The Vancouver Police Department's allowance for off-duty marijuana use among its officers raises numerous questions about the implications of this policy, particularly when contrasting it with the situation in the United States, where many jurisdictions maintain strict prohibitions.

From the viewpoint of a criminal justice administrator in a state where marijuana use is legal, it is essential to consider how such policies might affect public trust, officer behavior, and overall departmental culture. Legalization presents an opportunity to revise longstanding perceptions of marijuana as a dangerous substance. In the context of policing, allowing officers to use marijuana off-duty, as demonstrated by the Vancouver Police Department, may strengthen the relationship between the police and the communities they serve by normalizing marijuana use among law enforcement personnel. However, this policy also carries risks, as it may lead to perceptions of diminished professionalism or inconsistencies in officers' conduct, particularly regarding their fitness for duty.

Administrators might argue that as long as officers are fit for duty and can demonstrate their professional obligations are met while on the job, personal choices regarding recreational marijuana use should not interfere with their work. Just as with alcohol consumption, if officers can ensure their responsibilities are met, it may not warrant prohibiting their use of marijuana. The approach promotes personal accountability — officers are trusted to regulate their behavior without jeopardizing their performance or public safety.

Conversely, as a private citizen, one may view the implications of such policies with more skepticism. The concern may center around public safety and the potential for impaired judgment in high-stress situations. Police officers often find themselves in scenarios requiring quick decision-making, sound judgment, and clarity of thought; thus, any substance use, including marijuana, might compromise these skills. Beyond the individual officer, there is a broader societal concern that normalization of marijuana use among police could inadvertently send a message to the community that substance use is acceptable, potentially diminishing the authority and respect of law enforcement.

Moreover, the inconsistency between states' policing methods can exacerbate the stigma surrounding marijuana. While some jurisdictions may decriminalize use, others, particularly in the U.S., remain staunchly opposed, leading to confusion among citizens regarding what is acceptable. For instance, the Atlanta Police Department's approach to dropping questions about marijuana use during recruitment indicates the growing acceptance of marijuana in professional circles, yet it also highlights the ongoing divide between states vis-à-vis marijuana laws.

As a result, both perspectives yield compelling arguments regarding the use of marijuana by law enforcement. From an administrative perspective, promoting a policy of personal accountability amongst officers could enhance officer-community relationships. However, from a citizen's perspective, the nuances of public perception, safety, and the potential erosion of respect toward law enforcement must be considered seriously.

A balanced approach might be to establish clear guidelines delineating the conditions under which officers can use marijuana while off-duty. These guidelines should include stipulations regarding the duration of time between use and the beginning of a shift, similar to alcohol regulations in many police departments. This hybrid policy could promote both officer well-being and community safety, allowing for personal freedom while ensuring public trust remains intact.

Engaging in open dialogues about these topics can also help bridge the gap between law enforcement officers and communities. Public forums or feedback mechanisms could create more understanding and transparency, empowering citizens to express their concerns while officers articulate their needs for personal autonomy.

Lastly, it is essential to remain vigilant regarding the evolving nature of marijuana legislation, recognizing that its sociocultural ramifications will continue to unfold. Policymakers must therefore remain adaptable, ensuring that their regulations reflect both the current legal landscape and the broader societal values that underpin public trust in law enforcement.

References

• Canadian Government. (2021). Cannabis Legalization and Regulation. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/services/health/campaigns/cannabis.html
• Vancouver Police Department. (2019). Police Department Policy on Substance Use. Retrieved from https://vpd.ca
• The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). (2020). Marijuana Policy in the United States. Retrieved from https://norml.org
• Atlanta Police Department. (2020). Police Recruiting and Background Investigation. Retrieved from https://atlantapd.org
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2021). World Drug Report 2021. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org
• American Psychological Association. (2021). The Effects of Marijuana on Health. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org
• Fielding, M. (2019). Impacts of Legalization on the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Criminal Justice, 65, 101-110.
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2020). Is Marijuana Safe and Effective as Medicine? Retrieved from https://www.drugabuse.gov
• Institute for the Advancement of Behavioral Healthcare. (2020). The New Landscape of Cannabis Use. Journal of Behavioral Health, 7(3), 167-175.
• Gonzalez, M. (2021). Marijuana in the Workplace: Legal and Ethical Considerations. Employment Law Journal, 26(4), 99-108.