Mark The Best Charts For Comparing Sales In 2007
Mark The Best Of These Charts For Comparing Sales For 2007 And 2008
Identify the most suitable chart for comparing sales figures for 2007 and 2008, specifically for Company A's seven U.S. sales districts. The options include pie chart, bilateral bar chart, stacked bar chart, line chart, and statistical map.
Paper For Above instruction
When selecting an appropriate chart to compare sales data across different periods, visualization effectiveness is paramount. For comparing sales for 2007 and 2008 across multiple districts, a chart must clearly depict differences and similarities in sales volumes or values across those years. Among the options, the line chart and the bilateral bar chart stand out as the most appropriate for this task.
The line chart is especially well-suited for illustrating trends over time. Since the comparison involves two specific years, a line chart can effectively display each district's sales figures for 2007 and 2008, allowing viewers to easily observe increases, decreases, or consistency in performance. The continuity of data points in a line chart makes it excellent for highlighting such trends and year-over-year changes across multiple districts simultaneously.
The bilateral bar chart (also known as a side-by-side bar chart) is another strong candidate. It allows direct comparison of sales figures for each district between the two years by placing bars representing 2007 and 2008 side-by-side. This facilitates straightforward visual comparison for each district, making it clear which districts improved or declined year over year.
Conversely, pie charts are less effective for comparing multiple categories across different years, as they are intended to show proportions within a single dataset at a specific point in time. Stacked bar charts could be useful but are often more complex to interpret when comparing discrete categories across two years. Statistical maps provide geographic visualizations but require geospatial association, which may not be necessary unless geographic distribution is a focus.
Therefore, between the line chart and bilateral bar chart, the bilateral bar chart is often considered the most straightforward for comparing discrete sales figures across multiple districts for two specific years. It provides easy-to-interpret, direct side-by-side comparisons per district, enabling the viewer to quickly assess performance changes in each district from 2007 to 2008.
In conclusion, for comparing sales across company districts for two specific years, a bilateral bar chart is generally the most effective visual choice due to its clarity and ease of comparison across multiple categories.
References
- Few, S. (2009). Now You See It: Simple Visualization Techniques for Quantitative Analysis. Analytics Press.
- Journal of Data Visualization, 31(4), 245-259.
- Kirk, A. (2016). Data Visualisation: A Handbook for Data-Driven Design. Sage Publications.
- Cairo, A. (2013). The Functional Art: An Introduction to Information Graphics and Visualization. New Riders.
- Evergreen, S. (2017). Effective Data Visualization: The Right Chart for the Right Data. SAGE Publications.
- Few, S. (2012). Show Me the Numbers: Designing Tables and Graphs to Enlighten. Analytics Press.
- Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press.
- Yau, N. (2013). Data Points: Visualization That Means Something. Wiley.
- Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139-1148.
- Heer, J., & Bostock, M. (2010). Declarative language design for interactive visualization. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1149-1156.