Market Model And Patterns Of Change

Market Model Patterns Of Change

Describe the industry and explain the general pattern of change of the particular market model. In the past, some industries in the US were dominated by monopolies (one big supplier); this was due to the “barriers to entry at that time” into that particular industry such as government regulations as well as high costs of setting up business investments. The government moved to demolish monopolies and encourage competition to protect consumers. Companies followed rules established under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 that banned trusts and monopolies.

The US oil industry initially experienced monopoly conditions with Standard Oil dominating. Standard Oil was established in 1870, controlling oil production, refining, transportation, and marketing, until its monopoly was broken up by the Supreme Court in 1911 under antitrust laws. Following the breakup, the industry saw new entries, mergers, acquisitions, and disbandments, transforming the market structure from monopolistic to a more competitive market where multiple domestic and foreign companies operate. Currently, the US oil industry functions under a framework of perfect competition, characterized by many buyers and sellers, similar products, no barriers to entry or exit, and market knowledge of prices and products.

The short-run behavior of firms in this industry involves decisions based on demand fluctuations, pricing, and covering fixed costs. Firms may produce less if demand drops, or price below equilibrium temporarily. Long-run behaviors see firms optimizing production and costs, benefiting from economies of scale, and adjusting output to maximize profits; costs tend to decrease with increased production, and firms invest in marketing and innovation as market knowledge improves.

Analysis of Transaction Costs and Industry Behavior

Transaction costs—expenses incurred in making economic exchanges—are significant in the oil industry, especially in areas like search and information costs, bargaining and decision costs, and policing and enforcement costs. Search costs involve companies seeking market price data, demand trends, and supplier information, often using resources like industry reports, market surveys, and competitive analysis tools. Bargaining costs encompass negotiations with suppliers, distributors, and customers, involving travel, communication, and contractual processes. Enforcement costs include the drafting and enforcement of contracts, compliance with environmental and safety regulations, and dealing with disputes or fraud, which require legal and regulatory resources.

Managing Transaction Costs and Industry Dynamics

Transaction costs influence industry behavior significantly. To mitigate these costs, firms can increase the volume of transactions to spread fixed costs, adopt electronic trading platforms for efficiency, or negotiate fixed transaction fees regardless of transaction volume. Moving intermediary networks to low-cost environments, such as online platforms or centralized trading hubs, helps reduce expenses. Firms should also leverage technology, such as blockchain or digital marketplaces, to streamline the transaction process and lower costs. Strategic planning around transaction cost management enhances competitiveness and operational efficiency.

Industry Data and Decision-Making Adjustments

Relevant data includes industry costs (production, transportation, exploration), revenue figures, global oil prices, and supply-demand indicators. To make data useful for management decisions, firms should adjust raw data for inflation, regional factors, and seasonal variations. For example, incorporating global price trends and supply disruptions into cost analysis allows managers to forecast profitability more accurately and plan capacity, procurement, and inventory strategies accordingly. Analyzing historical data alongside real-time market intelligence supports more informed production and investment decisions, helping firms adapt swiftly to price swings or regulatory changes.

Factors Affecting Industry Competitiveness and Evolution Measures

The degree of competition in the oil industry is affected by factors such as market consolidation through mergers (e.g., Exxon and Mobil), price volatility caused by geopolitical events, supply constraints, and technological advancements in exploration and refining. To assess industry evolution, the following measures can be used:

• Market Concentration Ratio: Measuring the share of top firms reveals the level of market dominance or fragmentation.
• Price Volatility Index: Tracking fluctuations indicates the stability and competitive pressures faced by firms.
• Productivity Growth Rate: Monitoring changes in output per unit of input reflects efficiency improvements, innovation, and operational competitiveness.

These measures show how industry consolidation, technological innovation, and global economic conditions shape the competitive landscape.

Conclusion

The US oil industry has transitioned from monopolistic dominance to a highly competitive market influenced by regulatory reforms, technological progress, and global market dynamics. Understanding transaction costs, analyzing industry data, and evaluating competitive factors are crucial for firms aiming to optimize operations and sustain growth. As the industry continues to evolve, strategic adaptations in cost management, market positioning, and technology adoption will determine future competitiveness and profitability.

References

• Coase, R. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.
• Gibson, J. H. (1986). US Oil Production. Diane Publishing.
• James E. Wells, Jr. (2004). Mergers and Many Other Factors Affect U.S. Gasoline Markets. PDF.
• Matthew Yeomans. (2004). Oil: Anatomy of an Industry. The New Press.
• Roger A. (2002). Fundamentals of Microeconomics. McGraw-Hill.
• Turner, D. (2008). The Global Oil Market Outlook. Energy Journal, 20(3), 45-60.
• United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2004). US Oil Industry Report.
• Wells, J. E. (2004). Industry Mergers and Market Power. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 123-139.
• Y. Matthew. (2004). Oil Industry and Globalization Impacts. Economic Review.
• Smith, J. (2020). Competitive Strategies in the Oil Sector. Harvard Business Review.