Matching Objectives To Instruction [CLOs: 1, 4] Review The C

Matching Objectives To Instruction CLOs 1 4 Review the Common

Matching Objectives To Instruction [CLOs: 1, 4] Review the Common

Prepare a lesson plan using the KUD (Know, Understand, Do) Lesson Plan Template based on an academic standard selected from the Common Core State Standards website that aligns with the direct instruction model. The plan should include a detailed explanation of the grade level, a description of the instructional model, the full nomenclature of the selected standard, and clearly defined objectives. Specifically, list two “Students will KNOW” objectives, two “Students will UNDERSTAND” objectives, and two “Students will be able to DO” objectives.

Describe at least two activities that support your KUD objectives within a direct instruction framework. Draw from Chapters 3 and 4 of your textbook, as well as at least two scholarly sources and your personal insights/experiences, to inform your lesson plan and activities.

Paper For Above instruction

Title: Designing a Direct Instruction Lesson Plan Aligned with Common Core Standards Using KUD Framework

Introduction

Effective lesson planning is a cornerstone of successful teaching, especially when aligned with standards and instructional models such as direct instruction. The Knowledge, Understanding, and Doing (KUD) framework provides a systematic way to organize learning objectives, ensuring clarity and focus for both teachers and students. This paper presents a comprehensive lesson plan development process based on the standards from the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and demonstrates how to integrate instructional activities that reinforce the objectives within a direct instruction paradigm.

Selection of Standard and Grade Level

The standard selected for this lesson plan is from the mathematics domain, specifically CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.OA.A.1: "Represent addition and subtraction with objects, drawings, and equations." This standard is appropriate for kindergarten students (Grade 0-1 in some states) and lends itself well to direct instruction, emphasizing explicit teaching and guided practice.

Explanation of the Grade Level and Instructional Model

The lesson targets kindergarten students, who are at foundational stages of mathematical understanding. At this grade level, the instructional approach focuses on explicit, teacher-led demonstrations, step-by-step modeling, and practice exercises—hallmarks of the direct instruction model. This approach helps students grasp fundamental concepts through structured guidance and immediate feedback, fostering confidence and mastery in core skills.

Full Nomenclature of the Standard

The full standard is: "CCSS.MATH.CONTENT.K.OA.A.1 - Represent addition and subtraction with objects, drawings, and equations."

Learning Objectives

Knowledge Objectives:

  • Students will KNOW the symbols used for addition (+) and subtraction (–).
  • Students will KNOW how to identify addition and subtraction in different contexts.

Understanding Objectives:

  • Students will UNDERSTAND that addition and subtraction are inverse operations.
  • Students will understand how to model addition and subtraction using objects and drawings.

Abilities/Objectives:

  • Students will BE ABLE to solve simple addition and subtraction problems using manipulatives.
  • Students will BE ABLE to write and interpret basic addition and subtraction equations.

Procedures and Activities Supporting KUD Objectives

Activity 1: Modeling Addition and Subtraction with Manipulatives

In this activity, the teacher introduces addition and subtraction using classroom manipulatives such as counters or blocks. The teacher demonstrates how to combine groups of objects to represent addition and how to separate objects to illustrate subtraction. Students then practice with partner activities, constructing their own addition and subtraction problems using manipulatives to reinforce their understanding of the concepts and symbols.

Activity 2: Draw and Solve Exercises

Next, students draw pictures to represent addition and subtraction problems, such as "There are 3 apples, and I get 2 more," or "There are 5 candies, and I eat 2." Guided by the teacher, students practice translating their drawings into equations, fostering comprehension of the inverse relationship between addition and subtraction. This activity emphasizes modeling and interpretation, supporting their ability to understand and do the operations independently.

Discussion and Reflection

These activities exemplify explicit instruction, providing clear demonstrations and opportunities for practice aligned with the KUD framework. Research by Hansen, Buczynski, and Puckett (2015), emphasizes curriculum development that focuses on outcomes and skill acquisition aligned with standards. Additionally, inquiry-based activities like WebQuests (Lacina, 2007) or concept-focused teaching (Olson, 2008) can complement direct instruction for deeper understanding, but the core approach in this lesson remains explicit and structured to meet the objectives efficiently.

Conclusion

In designing this lesson plan, the integration of a standards-based approach with the KUD framework ensures clarity in objectives and instructional coherence. The activities are intentionally chosen to develop not only procedural skills but also conceptual understanding, aligning with best practices in curriculum development and instruction. Through explicit modeling, guided practice, and student demonstration, this lesson aims to provide a strong foundation in early mathematical operations—crucial for subsequent learning.

References

  • Hansen, C.B., Buczynski, S., & Puckett, K.S. (2015). Curriculum and Instruction for the 21st Century. Bridgepoint Education.
  • Lacina, J. (2007). Inquiry-based learning and technology: Designing and exploring webquests. Childhood Education, 83(4).
  • Olson, J.K. (2008). Concept-focused teaching: Using big ideas to guide instruction in science. Science and Children, 46(4), 45-49.
  • Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
  • Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson.
  • Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
  • Goodwin, B., & Dimarco, J. (2017). Using explicit instruction to improve student outcomes. Journal of Educational Strategies, 31(2), 45-52.
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners. ASCD.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses on Achievement. Routledge.

Related Assignments