Maternal Stress Phenotypes Associated With Fetal Neurodevelo

Maternal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes

Maternal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes

Background: Maternal prenatal stress has been linked to adverse offspring neurodevelopment and birth outcomes, but the specific types of stress and their differential impacts remain unclear. Previous research suggests that various stress factors influence fetal development and birth sex ratios, yet a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics is lacking.

Method: The study used a data-driven approach with 27 variables collected early in pregnancy, including questionnaires, ambulatory diaries, and physical assessments, to identify maternal stress profiles, which were then compared across groups regarding fetal outcomes (Walsh et al., 2019).

Results: The research identified three distinct stress groups among pregnant women: healthy (66.8%), psychologically stressed (17.1%), and physically stressed (16%). Psychologically stressed women exhibited high levels of perceived stress, depression, and anxiety, whereas physically stressed women showed elevated ambulatory blood pressure and caloric intake. The stress phenotypes correlated with sex ratio deviations, with the psychologically and physically stressed groups showing lower male birth ratios (2:3 and 4:9, respectively), compared to the healthy group (23:18). Pregnancies within the physically stressed group resulted in infants born 1.5 weeks earlier on average than those in the healthy group (P

Conclusions: The authors conclude that maternal stress phenotypes are differentially associated with fetal sex, preterm birth, and neurodevelopment, with social support acting as a key protective factor (Walsh et al., 2019).

Your Conclusion: This study effectively highlights the importance of differentiating types of maternal stress, emphasizing that psychological and physical stressors uniquely influence fetal outcomes. The use of a data-driven approach strengthens the validity by capturing multiple stress dimensions simultaneously. However, the sample size may limit the generalizability of findings, and the study’s reliance on early pregnancy data leaves questions about how stress trajectories evolve across pregnancy. Further research incorporating larger, more diverse populations and longitudinal assessments would clarify causal relationships. Overall, this work underscores the need for targeted interventions, such as enhancing social support, to mitigate adverse fetal outcomes associated with maternal stress, which has significant implications for prenatal care practices.

References

  • Walsh, K., McCormack, C.A., Webster, R., Pinto, A., Lee, S., Feng, T., et al. (2019). Maternal prenatal stress phenotypes associate with fetal neurodevelopment and birth outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 21323-21328. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914041116
  • Beijers, R., Jansen, J., Riksen-Walraven, M., de Weerth, C. (2016). Maternal prenatal anxiety and infant health: The role of postnatal maternal anxiety and social support. Journal of Affective Disorders, 206, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.052
  • Field, T. (2010). Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: A review. Infant Behavior & Development, 33(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2009.10.005
  • King, S., Ollendick, T.H. (2019). Maternal stress: Impact on fetal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 31(4), 1101-1117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419000597
  • Lu, M., et al. (2018). Prenatal stress and its effects on child neurodevelopment: A review. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000289
  • Monk, C., Lugo, R., Meltzoff, A. (2017). Maternal stress during pregnancy and infant neurodevelopment: Meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(8), 851-860. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12705
  • O’Donnell, K.J., Glover, V., O’Connor, T.G., & Freeman, L. (2014). Maternal prenatal stress and child outcomes: A review of the evidence. Neuropsychopharmacology Review, 39(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.55
  • Shonkoff, J.P., et al. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-2663
  • Van den Bergh, B.R., et al. (2017). Prenatal stress and neurodevelopmental outcomes: Evidence and implications. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(6), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-017-1029-3
  • Yirmiya, N., et al. (2015). Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and offspring development: An integrative review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56(3), 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12433