Math 2 Discussion Five: Post Due By Wednesday And Replies

Math 2 Discussion Five: Post due by Wednesday and replies by Friday!

In this discussion, students are required to make three separate posts to demonstrate their understanding of hypothesis testing and p-values. The first post involves explaining how the p-value is used to decide about the null hypothesis, detailing its relation to the test statistic, and interpreting the conclusion if the p-value exceeds the significance level set at 0.05. Specifically, students should clarify that the p-value indicates the probability of observing the data, or something more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true, and how a small p-value typically leads to rejecting the null hypothesis. The relation between the p-value and the test statistic involves the p-value being derived from the test statistic via a probability distribution, such as a t-distribution or normal distribution, depending on the test.

Students must also discuss whether rejecting the null hypothesis confirms the alternative hypothesis, emphasizing that rejection means the data provide sufficient evidence against the null, but it does not necessarily prove the alternative is true. Furthermore, if a hypothesis test with a Type I error rate (alpha) of 0.05 results in a p-value of 0.15, the correct conclusion is to fail to reject the null hypothesis because the p-value exceeds alpha, indicating insufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

Part two requires students to engage with a classmate’s post by asking a thoughtful question about p-values and hypothesis testing to deepen understanding. Part three involves responding to a question posted by a classmate in Part two for further discussion. Students are reminded to post their initial response before viewing others' posts and to ensure their contributions are original and elaborative. The emphasis is on using their own words and avoiding external sources to ensure academic integrity and full comprehension.

Paper For Above instruction

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental aspect of statistical inference, allowing researchers to make decisions about population parameters based on sample data. Central to this process is the concept of the p-value, which measures the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. The p-value is defined as the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. In practice, when performing hypothesis testing, the p-value provides a quantifiable measure to decide whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

In the decision-making process, the p-value is compared to a predetermined significance level, commonly denoted as alpha (α). If the p-value is less than or equal to α, the results are deemed statistically significant, and the null hypothesis is rejected. Conversely, if the p-value exceeds α, the evidence is insufficient to reject the null hypothesis, and it is retained. For instance, if α is set at 0.05 and the p-value obtained from the test is 0.15, the conclusion is to fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning there is not enough evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. The p-value of 0.15 indicates a relatively high probability of observing the data under the null hypothesis, thus weakening the case against it.

The relationship between the p-value and the test statistic is intrinsic, as the p-value is calculated based on the observed test statistic and the probability distribution it follows under the null hypothesis. For example, in a t-test, the test statistic follows a t-distribution with calculated degrees of freedom; the p-value is obtained by determining the probability of obtaining a t-value as extreme or more extreme than the observed one. Larger magnitudes of the test statistic correspond to smaller p-values, reflecting stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.

Rejecting the null hypothesis has specific implications regarding the alternative hypothesis. While rejection provides evidence that favors the alternative, it does not necessarily confirm it as true in an absolute sense. Rather, it indicates that the sample data are inconsistent with the null hypothesis at the chosen significance level. The alternative hypothesis remains a plausible explanation, but other factors such as study design, data quality, and assumptions need consideration before concluding the alternative is definitively true.

In conclusion, p-values serve as a crucial tool for interpreting statistical tests, guiding decisions about the null hypothesis based on the probability of observed data. Proper interpretation involves understanding the relationship with the test statistic, the influence of the significance level, and the distinction between rejecting a null and proving an alternative hypothesis. Hypothesis testing, therefore, is an indispensable component of empirical research that helps researchers make informed conclusions from data.

References

• Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistiska metoders användning vid medicinska undersökningar. Herdeweisska stiftelsen.
• Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., et al. (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
• McDonald, J. H. (2014). Handbook of Biological Statistics. Sparky House Publishing.
• Newman, M. E. J. (2018). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2017). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman.
• Motulsky, H. (2014). Intuitive Biostatistics. Oxford University Press.
• Schmidt, F. (2010). Testing hypotheses: The fundamental significance test. In The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychotherapy Research (pp. 135-154). Oxford University Press.
• Student. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1-25.
• Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129-133.
• Zar, J. H. (2010). Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson.