Meas 150x4 Double Array Support Your Initial And Subsequent ✓ Solved
```html
Meas150x4 Double Array Support Your Initial And Subsequent
Support your initial and subsequent posts by citing at least two academic resources, preferably from the Ashford University Library. Ethical Conflicts A patient under the care of your agency committed suicide, and you are in charge of the adverse incident review of this case. Considering the stakeholders in your agency (clients, providers, management, third-party payers, etc.), what are the potential ethical conflicts that may arise from your role investigating this incident, and what would you do to appropriately discharge your ethical duties? When you discuss the potential ethical conflicts, provide evidence from the scholarly articles you read for this week and/or reference specific, relevant ethical standards from the Ethical Standards for Human Services Professionals from the National Organization for Human Services. When responding to your peers’ original postings, review the conflicts they selected and elaborate upon them by commenting on their approach and/or making suggestions.
Paper For Above Instructions
The ethical dimensions surrounding adverse incident reviews, particularly in cases such as a suicide under an agency's care, invoke numerous complexities that necessitate careful navigation and analysis. These complexities often place the investigator in a challenging position where multiple stakeholders' interests intersect, and ethical duties must be balanced with organizational responsibilities.
Understanding Ethical Conflicts in Incident Review
In this investigation, several potential ethical conflicts may arise. First and foremost, there is a conflict of interest between the need for transparency and accountability and the protection of the agency’s reputation. Agencies often face pressure to minimize liability and avoid negative publicity, which can lead to a culture of defensiveness rather than one of openness and learning (Essock, Olfson, & Hogan, 2015).
Secondly, there is the potential conflict between the ethical obligation to report findings truthfully and the tendency to downplay adverse outcomes that may tarnish the agency’s standing. This dilemma often results in ethical distress among employees tasked with providing honest assessments of care (Marbury, 2016). Additionally, staff members may experience a fear of retribution or job loss that can compromise the integrity of the investigation.
Balancing Stakeholder Interests
When conducting the investigation, it is vital to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders. Clients, for instance, expect their care providers to engage in practices that prioritize their well-being and dignity. Failing to conduct a thorough review could lead to a breach of trust, adversely affecting not just the immediate parties involved but also the brand and ethos of the agency (National Organization for Human Services, 2015).
Providers may face moral injury or trauma from being associated with the incident, heightening the need for a supportive atmosphere that allows health care professionals to voice their concerns without fear. Management's interest lies in maintaining operational integrity and compliance with regulatory standards while ensuring the well-being of staff and patients alike (Vargo et al., 2013).
Discharging Ethical Duties
To navigate these conflicts, it is imperative to adopt a framework that aligns with ethical standards tailored for human service professionals. Establishing transparent communication across all levels of agency operations can help mitigate fears and encourage a culture of safety and learning. Furthermore, involving diverse stakeholder perspectives in the review process can shed light on various facets of the incident (Kelly, 2009).
Implementing ethical decision-making models that prioritize principles such as justice, respect, and beneficence can guide the investigation process. For instance, actively engaging clients and families in the review process respects their rights and assures them of the agency's commitment to accountability (Sharfstein, 2015). Formalizing the reporting procedures so that they include input from all relevant parties can create a balanced approach that respects vulnerable populations while holding providers accountable.
The Role of Research in Ethical Decision-Making
Utilizing scholarly literature as a backdrop for ethical decision-making enhances the robustness and defensibility of the investigation findings. Empirical studies can provide context to the potential outcomes resulting from various approaches taken in similar cases. For instance, integrating findings from the works of Essock et al. (2015) can illustrate the importance of routine outcome measures in fostering accountability and improving services.
Moreover, consulting resources dedicated to ethical standards, such as those from the National Organization for Human Services (2015), can illuminate key principles that must guide practice, ensuring that ethical obligations are not neglected but rather actively pursued. Through evidence-based references and adherence to established ethical frameworks, the investigator can build a framework that not only elucidates the complexities and conflicts inherent in adverse incident reviews but also fosters a commitment to system improvement and client care.
Conclusion
In summary, navigating the ethical conflicts arising from investigating a patient suicide requires a nuanced understanding of the involved stakeholders and their respective responsibilities. The commitment to transparency, integrity, and accountability must remain at the forefront, sustained by a framework of ethical standards and scholarly resources. Such a rigorous approach can facilitate the investigation in a manner that aligns with the best interests of clients while supporting the providers, fostering a culture that embraces growth and learning.
References
- Essock, S. M., Olfson, M., & Hogan, M. F. (2015). Current practices for measuring mental health outcomes in the USA: International overview of routine outcome measures in mental health. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(4).
- Kelly, T. A. (2009). Healing the broken mind: Transforming America's failed mental health system: Ideas from a new book about transformation in the mental health system. Behavioral Healthcare, 29(10), 35.
- Marbury, D. (2016). How behavioral health can benefit from population health strategies: breaking down silos remains critical for building continuity between primary care and behavioral health. Behavioral Healthcare, 36(3), 40, 42-43.
- National Organization for Human Services. (2015). Ethical standards for human services professionals.
- Vargo, A. C., Sharrock, P. J., Johnson, M. H., & Armstrong, M. I. (2013). The use of a participatory approach to develop a framework for assessing quality of care in children's mental health services. Administration And Policy in Mental Health, 40(4).
- Sharfstein, J. M. (2015). Dear health care lobbyists... The Milbank Quarterly, 93(1), 15-18.
```