Merlin Metal Works After Getting A Master’s Degree In 984250

Merlinmetalworksaftergettingamastersdegreeinbusinessspen

Merlin Metalworks, a small bicycle manufacturer based in Albany, New York, faced numerous organizational challenges after Ashley Korenblat was appointed as president. With her background in business, Wall Street stockbroking, and management in traditional manufacturing, Korenblat sought to implement her theories to improve operations. However, the company encountered fundamental problems related to decision-making authority, communication, operational efficiency, and organizational structure.

One immediate issue involved two welders seeking time off without clear guidance from their supervisor. This highlights a common problem in organizations where authority and communication channels are ambiguous or poorly defined, leading employees to bypass traditional lines of authority. These disruptions, although minor, exemplify how lack of structured decision-making processes can hinder operational flow. Similarly, a significant problem arose when a customer complaint about a defective bottom bracket halted a shipment. The customer service department had the authority to cease production to address customer issues, but this authority, while beneficial in prioritizing customer satisfaction, can also cause delays if not managed properly. Halting the threading machine impacted the entire shipping schedule, illustrating how centralized authority without coordination can ripple through the supply chain.

Korenblat’s decision to redesign the brakes on road bikes exemplifies strategic decision-making aimed at cost reduction. While her initiative aimed to make production more economical, subsequent review by purchasing officials revealed the redesign incurred unforeseen expenses exceeding expected savings. This scenario underscores the importance of cross-functional communication and thorough cost analysis in product redesigns. It also highlights the risks associated with unilateral decisions in manufacturing environments, where subsequent re-evaluation may reveal hidden costs.

To foster employee autonomy and decision-making, Korenblat organized the machine department into teams responsible for scheduling, work sequencing, and operational coordination. While this decentralized approach initially seemed promising, it became problematic during peak season when increased order sizes led to larger production runs. The teams, responsible for coordinating complex processes involving linear and simultaneous operations, struggled under increased volumes. Larger batch sizes resulted in a backlog, overburdening the production schedule, and causing machine stoppages. The decision to continuously increase batch sizes without considering capacity constraints exemplifies a mismatch between planning and operational capacity. It emphasizes the necessity for dynamic planning and real-time adjustments based on production capabilities rather than fixed assumptions.

Overall, Merlin Metalworks’ organizational issues stem from a lack of clear authority, inadequate communication, and inflexible production planning. These problems highlight the importance of establishing transparent decision-making processes, fostering cross-departmental communication, and adapting operational strategies to fluctuating demand. Implementing effective management systems, such as coordinated authority structures, integrated communication channels, and flexible production schedules, could mitigate these challenges. Additionally, embracing lean manufacturing principles could streamline operations, reduce waste, and improve responsiveness to seasonal fluctuations. Korenblat’s leadership exemplifies the challenges faced by small manufacturers transitioning from traditional to more autonomous organizational structures, underscoring the need for strategic alignment between decision authority, communication, and operational capacity.

Paper For Above instruction

Merlin Metalworks, a boutique bicycle manufacturer located in Albany, New York, encountered significant organizational challenges after Ashley Korenblat took over as president. Drawing from her diverse background—including a master's degree in business, experience as a Wall Street stockbroker, and management roles in traditional manufacturing—Korenblat aimed to transform the company's operational efficiency and organizational culture. However, her initiatives uncovered critical issues related to decision-making authority, communication, and capacity management that impeded the company's production flow and overall effectiveness.

One fundamental problem was the ambiguity surrounding authority and communication within the organization. For instance, when two welders requested time off to attend personal appointments, they bypassed their supervisor, indicating unclear or ineffective communication channels and decision authority. Such issues are common in organizations where responsibility lines are blurred, leading employees to seek alternative means to address their needs, thereby disrupting workflow. This situation underscores the importance of clear policies and delegation of authority to ensure smooth operations and prevent unnecessary interruptions.

Another significant challenge was the production halt caused by a customer complaint regarding a defective bottom bracket. The customer service department had the authority to stop production to resolve issues, a power that underscores a decentralized decision-making process aimed at maintaining customer satisfaction. While beneficial in prioritizing customer needs, this approach can create bottlenecks if not properly coordinated, as seen when halting the threading machine halted shipments, delaying delivery schedules. This scenario highlights the delicate balance needed between immediate problem resolution and overall production continuity, illustrating the importance of integrated decision-making frameworks that align departmental objectives.

Korenblat’s decision to redesign the brakes on the company's road bikes was motivated by cost reduction. She believed the new design would be less expensive; however, subsequent reviews revealed that the redesign resulted in unforeseen expenses, surpassing the anticipated savings. This illustrates the risks inherent in making unilateral decisions without comprehensive cross-functional consultation. It emphasizes the necessity for collaborative evaluation involving purchasing, production, and quality assurance departments to avoid hidden costs and ensure decisions align with strategic financial goals.

In an effort to decentralize authority and improve employee decision-making, Korenblat organized the machine department into autonomous teams responsible for scheduling, sequencing operations, and coordinating complex processes involving multiple steps. While initially promising, this approach faced difficulties when demand surged during peak seasons. The teams, responsible for managing large production runs, struggled with capacity planning, resulting in production backlog and machine idling. Increasing batch sizes has long been viewed as a way to optimize efficiency; however, without appropriate capacity planning, such decisions can backfire, creating bottlenecks and reducing responsiveness to customer orders.

The situation at Merlin Metalworks underscores outdated or insufficient organizational processes that fail to adapt to fluctuating demands. The large batch sizes, driven by a desire to streamline production, exacerbated capacity constraints during seasonal peaks. This reflects a classic misalignment between operational planning and actual capacity—highlighting the necessity for flexible scheduling, real-time data analysis, and scalable capacity planning strategies. The company’s failure to adapt its batch sizes to operational realities resulted in significant inefficiencies and delays.

Overall, Merlin Metalworks’ organizational issues reflect common challenges faced by small manufacturing firms transitioning toward more autonomous and decentralized structures. Without effective communication channels, clear authority structures, and adaptable capacity management, such organizations risk encountering operational disruptions, increased costs, and customer dissatisfaction. To address these issues, the company needs to implement structured decision-making processes, improve interdepartmental communication, and develop flexible production schedules that can respond dynamically to demand fluctuations. Integrating lean manufacturing principles could help eliminate waste, reduce unnecessary activities, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Furthermore, leadership should focus on balancing autonomy with accountability, ensuring that decentralized teams operate within an aligned strategic framework that supports the company's overall objectives.

References

• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2020). Principles of Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Burgess, N. (2019). Operations Management (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2019). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press.
• Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press.
• Banerjee, S. (2018). Manufacturing Strategy: Text and Cases. Pearson.
• Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2018). Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications. CIPD.
• Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory Physics (3rd ed.). Waveland Press.
• Wadhwa, S., & Kogure, K. (2019). Understanding Manufacturing Processes. CRC Press.