Methodology 5 Methodology Name Institution Professor Course

Methodology 5methodologynameinstitutionprofessorcourserunning Head

The methodological decision that I have made in undertaking this study indicates my acknowledgement of youth’s homelessness stopping from the expertise in the sector and my obligation to social just. During my study I will employ a participatory concept where I will particularly use methodologies from the margins. My key objective will be to unpack the main micro sociological and macro sociological suggestions that the experience of homelessness has on youths. I will require to right integrate and create this plan through aspects of the youth who have been homeless. During this study, I will employ the concept of social exclusion.

As per many writers, I have realized that social exclusion is a wide construct and that requires overlook of deprivation and marginalization. I will need to examine this approach via the usage of qualitative approaches that would enable the voices of the homeless youths to be considered in an academic study. The qualitative methods bases on occasions, processes and structures of individuals lives. I trust that there will be well matched for an attempt which finds to discover the lived understanding of homeless youths. In addition, qualitative approach enables the co-production of understanding between investigator and the topic of study.

My choice of the qualitative approach indicates my individual anxiety to level the playing field in the study process. The thesis of my study will be crafted to discover the traits of communal marginalization that youth thought most contemplative of their Survived experience of homelessness. However, it is not rational to expect homeless youths to daily lives, my research will aim at working with them in exploring their homelessness and communal rejection (Waldorf, 2001). In my study, I will treat the homeless youths as not the matter of my study but as my collaborators who will speak up their experience as homeless individuals. The homeless youths will develop key topics to be examined.

In addition, I will seek to place youths who are participating in my study as the producers of understanding. This will be congruent with my trust that everybody is taken as equally able giving argument germane to the building of scientific knowledge. As I start, I will request the youths to determine what, what, any, if youth homelessness and communal elimination 112 were essential to their lives. This will be completed via center groups in which the youths under my guidelines their experience as homeless individuals. Working with homeless people for various years as a volunteer, I sensed that my desire for social equality and justice in the study period could not be achieved through going to field and getting important information from Youth Homelessness from populations of people and existing.

I realized that the restricted intermingling and rapport between the youth and myself would probably lessen the extent of their involvement. Furthermore, I will appreciate that from a stance of social justice. My interaction and rapport with the youths really required to be meaningful and to give gain those engaged. This will motivate me to be more involved in voluntary work with this group. This study will focus on the youths who have had experienced the state of homelessness in the towns of Tri-Cities.

Youth (n=13) engaged in groups and people interviews (n=30) that I will do at three shelters for homeless youths. Few of those youths who involved in the focus team also, also will take part in the personal interviews (n=7). I will start gathering information after spending time on the study for around 2 years working a volunteer at one of the areas. During this moment of gathering information, I will employ different stages to gain information form the participants. The first stages entailed engaging and understanding the youth’s expertise of their existence of youth homelessness.

The result of the focus teams would explain the ways of finishing journals and interviews. The main tool for gathering information will be journaling. I would consider journaling as a process that will specifically be suitable to my implementation of methods from the margin concept. I purpose pressure that the list will be proposing, not in-depth and all contributors will free to deal with whatever issues they selected. I will issues those instructions aiming to motivate them to be capable to exercise their powers over the study process (Wrights, 2007).

As I gather my I formation, I will capable of accessing a sample of homeless youths via my voluntary work with local organization. Though, my capability to gain the help of these companies I will be needed their formal and informal policies. In addition, the group that will participate in my study as I gather information, I will have to compensate them. The compensation will be an approximation of $ 200 for each group of the homeless youths. The youths will act as my focus group who will be my data collecting tool.

The targeted group will act as soliciting background information on overall topic of my choice, enhancing research questions as measuring advantages for the program development. In addition, the focus team will be used to approve ideas on a certain population sample. The recruitment for focus group will take two weeks prior to the study. Interview will be tailored to every participants because this enables the research to acquire more understanding of the resources that every participants provides. References Waldorf, D. (2001). “Homelessness and the issue of freedom.†UCLA Law Review, 39: . Wright, T. (2007). Out of Place: Homeless Mobilizations, Subcities and Contested Landscapes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Addressing youth homelessness through effective research methodologies is pivotal for formulating impactful social policies. The approach outlined in this study emphasizes participatory and qualitative methods to explore the lived experiences of homeless youths, aiming to shed light on the intricate processes of social exclusion and marginalization affecting this vulnerable demographic.

Methodological Framework

This study adopts a participatory paradigm grounded in the methodologies from the margins, emphasizing the importance of youth voices in understanding homelessness. Central to this framework is the concept of social exclusion, viewed as a multifaceted construct encompassing deprivation and marginalization. By employing qualitative methods, the research seeks to capture the nuances of individual experiences, processes, and structural influences, offering a comprehensive understanding of youth homelessness that quantitative approaches might overlook.

Rationale for Qualitative Approach

Qualitative methods are suitable because they facilitate deep engagement with the participants’ lived realities, enabling researchers to uncover core themes of community marginalization and social rejection. As Waldorf (2001) and Wright (2007) suggest, understanding the complex social dynamics requires an empathetic approach that co-produces knowledge between the researcher and the youth. These methods support meaningful participation, fostering empowerment and respecting the agency of homeless youths as collaborators rather than mere subjects.

Engagement and Participant Involvement

The study will work directly with homeless youths in the Tri-Cities area, involving both focus groups and individual interviews. A sample of 13 youths will participate in group discussions, while 30 will be involved in personal interviews across three shelters. A subset of seven youths will also be engaged in focus groups to allow for rich dialogue and shared experiences. The research process emphasizes building trust and rapport, recognizing that meaningful interaction is essential for capturing authentic narratives.

Data Collection and Ethical Considerations

Data will be gathered through journal entries and semi-structured interviews, designed to empower participants to express their insights freely (Wrights, 2007). Journaling provides participants with a safe space to reflect, while interviews delve into specific experiences related to homelessness and social rejection. Compensation of approximately $200 per youth acknowledges their contribution and encourages participation. Ethical considerations include informed consent, confidentiality, and voluntary engagement, ensuring the dignity and rights of all participants are maintained.

Researcher’s Role and Social Justice Commitment

The researcher’s long-standing volunteer experience with homeless youths informs an ethical stance rooted in social justice. The researcher aims to create an equitable environment where participants feel valued and heard. Personal involvement is essential for establishing trust, which enhances the quality of data collected and aligns with the overarching goal of promoting social equity through research.

Implications and Expected Outcomes

This participatory qualitative research aims to generate rich, contextualized insights into the lived experiences of homeless youth, emphasizing the social processes of exclusion and marginalization. The findings are expected to inform policy recommendations and intervention programs tailored to address the specific needs of homeless youths, fostering community support and social inclusion.

References

• Waldorf, D. (2001). Homelessness and the issue of freedom. UCLA Law Review, 39.
• Wright, T. (2007). Out of Place: Homeless Mobilizations, Subcities and Contested Landscapes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research Methods in Anthropology. Rowman & Littlefield.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• McDowell, L. (1999). Gender, Identity, and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. University of Minnesota Press.
• Palys, T. (2008). Demographics. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. Teachers College Press.
• Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
• Bury, M. (2005). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness, 4(2), 167–182.