Metropolitan Memorial Is Seeking To Expand Its Services ✓ Solved

Scenariometropolitan Memorial Is Seeking To Expand Its Service Offerin

Scenario Metropolitan Memorial is seeking to expand its service offerings into underserved rural communities. The Board of Directors has expressed concerns given the emergence of new payment models, low reimbursement from Medicare and Medicaid, and uncertainty in terms of provider incentives offered through the Affordable Care Act. The Board of Directors has requested an executive summary outlining the organization’s financial viability given the challenges facing health organizations, particularly those operating in rural communities.

The CEO has asked you to prepare an executive summary to present to the Board of Trustees, discussing the following information: identify the different types of healthcare payment models that could be utilized by Metropolitan Memorial; focus on rural hospitals. Research the Triple Aim and discuss ways the organization can achieve its goals—improving the experience of care, improving population health, and reducing per capita costs. Use the official website of the organization that developed the Triple Aim for your research. Discuss three examples for each of the three Triple Aim topics, totaling nine examples.

Analyze how the payer mix may impact hospital revenue, referencing scholarly resources and attached materials. Explain how value-based healthcare delivery could be utilized to save money, providing at least three examples. The entire executive summary should be between three to five pages, formatted according to the provided notes and adhering to APA 7th Edition standards.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Expansion into underserved rural communities presents strategic opportunities and significant financial challenges for healthcare organizations like Metropolitan Memorial. As the healthcare landscape evolves with new payment models, organizations must adapt their approaches to ensure sustainability and quality of care. This paper explores various healthcare payment models suitable for rural hospitals, examines how the Triple Aim can be achieved, analyzes the impact of payer mix on revenue, and discusses value-based healthcare strategies to reduce costs and improve outcomes.

Healthcare Payment Models for Rural Hospitals

Rural hospitals like Metropolitan Memorial need to navigate a complex hedging of payment models to sustain operations and enhance patient care. Three prominent payment models include fee-for-service (FFS), capitation, and value-based payments.

Fee-for-Service (FFS)

Traditional FFS compensates providers based on individual services rendered, encouraging volume. However, this model can lead to unnecessary procedures and increased healthcare costs (Kelley et al., 2018). Rural hospitals often rely heavily on FFS, which presents challenges given the low reimbursement rates from Medicare and Medicaid for certain services.

Capitation

Capitation involves a fixed prepayment per patient regardless of service volume, incentivizing cost containment and efficient care delivery (Shi & Singh, 2020). For rural hospitals, capitated payments can provide financial stability if paired with appropriate risk management strategies, especially for managing chronic disease populations.

Value-Based Payments

Value-based care models reward providers for quality outcomes and cost efficiency. These models include Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and bundled payments (Macias et al., 2019). Transitioning to value-based models may help rural hospitals improve care quality while controlling costs, aligning incentives with patient health outcomes.

The Triple Aim and Strategies for Achievement

The Triple Aim, developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, calls for simultaneously improving the patient experience, improving population health, and reducing per capita healthcare costs (Berwick et al., 2008). Each goal can be pursued through specific strategies.

Improving the Experience of Care

1. Implementing patient-centered care models that focus on culturally competent services, especially vital in rural settings (Schoenfeld et al., 2021).
2. Utilizing telehealth to expand access and provide timely services (Dorsey & Topol, 2016).
3. Enhancing continuity of care through integrated care coordination and community engagement programs (Chung et al., 2018).

Improving Population Health

1. Expanding preventive and primary care programs to address social determinants of health (Williams et al., 2019).
2. Partnering with local organizations for health education and community outreach (Jones et al., 2020).
3. Implementing chronic disease management programs tailored for rural populations (Bennett et al., 2017).

Reducing Per Capita Costs

1. Adopting care models that promote efficient resource utilization, such as bundled payments (Macias et al., 2019).
2. Using health IT to reduce redundant testing and improve care coordination (Menachemi & Collum, 2019).
3. Engaging patients in self-management to reduce hospital readmissions and emergency visits (Bishop et al., 2020).

Impact of Payer Mix on Hospital Revenue

Payer mix significantly influences hospital financial performance, especially in rural settings where Medicaid and Medicare constitute substantial proportions of payer sources (Jones & Ho, 2018). A higher proportion of Medicare and Medicaid reduces revenue due to lower reimbursement rates compared to private insurers. Hospitals serving primarily Medicaid patients face financial strain, necessitating strategic payer negotiations and alternative revenue sources such as grants and community-based funding (Buchanan et al., 2019). Additionally, payer mix affects the ability to invest in technology and workforce development, impacting long-term sustainability (Ornstein et al., 2020).

Value-Based Healthcare Delivery to Reduce Costs

Implementing value-based healthcare delivery models can effectively reduce hospital costs while improving quality. Three strategies include:

1. Participation in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs): ACOs promote coordinated care and shared savings programs, incentivizing providers to reduce unnecessary services (McWilliams et al., 2018).
2. Utilization of Care Pathways and Standardized Protocols: Evidence-based pathways minimize variation and improve efficiency (Gandhi et al., 2021).
3. Health IT Integration for Data Analytics: Advanced analytics can identify waste, streamline workflows, and support decision-making (Menachemi & Collum, 2019).

Conclusion

As Metropolitan Memorial seeks to expand into rural communities, understanding adaptable payment models, leveraging the principles of the Triple Aim, and implementing value-based care are vital steps towards sustainability. Balancing these strategies against the realities of payer mix and reimbursement challenges requires strategic planning and innovative approaches to ensure financial viability while delivering high-quality, patient-centered care.

References

• Bennett, K. J., et al. (2017). Chronic disease management in rural populations. Rural Health Journal, 21(3), 45-53.
• Bishop, L., et al. (2020). Engaging patients in self-management to reduce hospital readmissions. Health Affairs, 39(1), 123-130.
• Buchanan, P. J., et al. (2019). Financial challenges in rural hospitals. American Journal of Managed Care, 25(8), e239-e245.
• Chung, J., et al. (2018). Care coordination strategies in rural health. Journal of Rural Health, 34(2), 157-164.
• Dorsey, E. R., & Topol, E. J. (2016). Telemedicine and rural health. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375(15), 1395-1397.
• Gandhi, T. K., et al. (2021). Evidence-based clinical pathways to improve efficiency. Medical Practice Management, 37(2), 50-58.
• Jones, S., & Ho, K. (2018). Impact of payer mix on rural hospital finances. Healthcare Financial Management, 72(4), 48-54.
• McWilliams, J. M., et al. (2018). Shared savings in Medicare ACOs. JAMA, 319(10), 995-996.
• Macias, C., et al. (2019). Transitioning to value-based care: Opportunities and challenges. Health Affairs, 38(4), 615-622.
• Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2019). Benefits and drawbacks of health information technology. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 12, 47–54.