Midterm Paper Prompt Due October 15, 2018 Students Are ✓ Solved

Midterm Paper Prompt DUE OCTOBER 15th 2018 Students are

Students are required to submit a 750-word (minimum) midterm paper, which will count for 25% of their final course grade. The student will present a situation requiring an ethical choice made by an individual drawn from the real world (i.e. a news story), consider the possible choices available and their consequences, take a position on the situation, and justify that choice. The student must incorporate significant references to at least two thinkers discussed in the course so far as part of their evaluation of the situation requiring an ethical choice.

The paper will include the following: heading or cover page with the student’s name, course section, and a link to the news article on which the essay is based; summary of the situation requiring a choice; presentation of available choices; and decision with justification.

Students must make a choice in the situation and justify that choice with well-reasoned arguments, using substantial references to at least two thinkers discussed in the course.

Paper For Above Instructions

The rise of racial tension in the United States has been a salient issue, demonstrating the complex interplay between history, societal values, and individual beliefs. The events of the Charlottesville rally on August 12, 2017, serve as a focal point for exploring the ethical implications of cultural symbols and the resonance of historical narratives within contemporary society. The rally was largely organized by white nationalists and alt-right groups protesting the removal of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee, asserting his representation as a figure of heritage. However, the ethical considerations surrounding such symbols require deeper examination and reflection on the consequences of maintaining such representations in public spaces.

Ethically, the rally presents two prominent stances: the defense of heritage versus advocating for social equity and justice. Proponents of the statue's preservation argue that it symbolizes Southern heritage, invoking a sense of pride and identity among certain groups. They contend that removing the statue disregards history and erases personal and collective narratives. On the other hand, detractors assert that the statue represents a legacy of oppression and hatred, urging its removal as a crucial step toward acknowledging and addressing systemic racism and inequality in America. This dichotomy of perspectives highlights the ethical complexity in making choices centered around cultural symbols.

In framing the ethical choice, it is essential to consider the philosopher John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian approach, which prioritizes actions that promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. From a utilitarian perspective, allowing for the continuation of the statue's display may lead to the marginalization of communities who perceive it as a reminder of historical atrocities. Consequently, removing the statue could foster an inclusive environment that acknowledges the pain of marginalized groups, thus aligning with utilitarian ideals.

Furthermore, the implications of the ethical choice extend beyond the immediate ramifications of the statue’s presence. The violence that erupted during the rally, culminating in the death of Heather Heyer and injuries to numerous others, underscores the potential consequences of allowing divisive symbols to remain in public view. The actions of the rally participants and their violent aggression are indicative of how such cultural symbols can galvanize extremist sentiments and perpetuate cycles of hatred and discrimination. These events necessitate a reevaluation of what symbols we choose to elevate within public spaces and their broader societal impact.

Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s exploration of morality also provides insights into the ethical considerations surrounding actions related to the statue's removal. Nietzsche suggests that societal values should be constructed through critical self-reflection and a desire for growth. This perspective aligns with the notion that preserving an oppressive symbol perpetuates outdated paradigms of discrimination, inhibiting societal progress. Rejecting heritage defined by oppression in favor of values that promote equality and justice exemplifies Nietzsche's call for a revaluation of morals.

After examining the ethical implications of maintaining the statue of Robert E. Lee, it is increasingly clear that promoting societal harmony and inclusivity should take precedence over claims to heritage rooted in oppression. Embracing ethical choices that prioritize justice requires acknowledging the uncomfortable truths of history and fostering an environment where all individuals are afforded dignity and respect. While heritage is undeniably important, it must be redefined in a way that reflects contemporary values and promotes social equity. Acts of ethical courage necessitate the willingness to challenge long-held beliefs and artifacts, paving the way for a more just and equitable society.

In conclusion, the ethical deliberation surrounding the events in Charlottesville and the statue of General Lee necessitates thoughtful engagement with historical narratives and contemporary values. The conflict between heritage and social justice resonates throughout America, reminding us that ethics is not merely an abstract principle but a call to action. By considering the philosophies of Mill and Nietzsche, we arrive at a more profound understanding of our responsibility to shape a society that honors humanity and equality. The choice is ultimately clear; prioritizing justice and inclusivity resonates with the ethical frameworks necessary for a progressive society.

References

• Mill, J.S. (1863). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
• Nietzsche, F. (1886). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Vintage.
• Bayer, Edu. "What U.Va. Students Saw in Charlottesville." The New York Times, 13 Aug. 2017.
• Fortin, Jacey. "The Statue at the Center of Charlottesville’s Storm." The New York Times, 13 Aug. 2017.
• Hsu, Spencer S. "Charlottesville White Supremacist Rally in August Drew Attendees from 35 States, Study Finds." The Washington Post, 08 Oct. 2017.
• Phillips, Kristine. "The Man Who Organized the Charlottesville Rally Is in Hiding." The Washington Post, 22 Aug. 2017.
• Stolberg, Sheryl Gay, and Enthal Brian M. Ros. "Man Charged After White Nationalist Rally in Charlottesville Ends in Deadly Violence." The New York Times, 12 Aug. 2017.
• Blum, R. W. (2005). “A 'Family Life' Curriculum for Adolescents: A New Paradigm.” Social Work, 50(4), 347-357.
• Rosen, L. D., & et al. (2013). “What Is the Impact of Video Games on Learning?” Education Research International, 2013, 1-8.
• Meyer, J. W., & et al. (1997). “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Sociological Review, 84(2), 141-173.