Midterm Study Guide: Chapters 4, 5, 8, 9 Sexuality And Value

Midterm Study Guide 2chapters 4 5 8 9sexuality Sexual Values And

Midterm Study Guide covering chapters 4, 5, 8, and 9 focuses on understanding key concepts related to sexuality, sexual values, dating, love, marriage, family, and diverse relationship structures. It emphasizes defining core terms, recognizing the standards and influences on sexual behaviors, analyzing the evolution of dating practices, exploring theories of love, examining marriage dynamics, and understanding various family types and social attitudes towards different sexual orientations and relationship models.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding human sexuality requires a multifaceted approach, integrating biological, psychological, social, and cultural perspectives. This paper explores various aspects of sexuality, dating, love, marriage, and family, emphasizing how these domains are interconnected and influenced by societal norms and personal values.

Sexuality and Values

Fundamental to human experience, sexuality encompasses biological, emotional, and behavioral components. A sexual value is a personal or societal belief about what constitutes acceptable or desirable sexual behavior (Baker, 2008). The four standards of sexuality during adulthood include physical, emotional, behavioral, and cultural dimensions, shaping individual attitudes and actions (Shannon et al., 2017). We learn about sex through various avenues, including upbringing, media, peers, education, and personal experience. Among these, comprehensive sex education and open dialogue are most effective in promoting healthy sexual behaviors among adolescents (Kirby, 2007).

A sexual script refers to the culturally ingrained expectations about how individuals should behave in sexual situations (Simon & Gagnon, 1986). Men are generally expected to be more sexually assertive, whereas women are often encouraged to be more reserved, although these expectations are evolving with societal change (Laumann et al., 1994). As people age, their sexuality tends to shift, often becoming less active physically but still emotionally significant (Levine et al., 2019).

Dating and Relationships

The purpose of dating varies widely: recreation, companionship, intimacy and sex, mate selection, socialization, and status achievement (Finkel et al., 2012). Dating practices have evolved from courtship to include online platforms, reflecting societal shifts towards globalization and technological advancement. Historically, dating served as a filtering mechanism through propinquity (geographical closeness), endogamy (same social group), and exogamy (outside the family group). Factors influencing dating trends in the U.S. include race, ethnicity, religion, socioeconomic status, appearance, age, and residential proximity (Schwartz & Montgomery, 1998).

Online dating has gained popularity due to its convenience, wider selection, and the ability to vet potential partners before meeting in person. However, its success is often hindered by misrepresentation, superficial judgments, and the lack of immediate emotional cues (Finkel et al., 2012).

The concept of love encompasses several types: romantic, companionate, and consummate love. Romantic love involves intense emotional and physical attraction, usually developing early in relationships. Companionate love, characterized by deep affection and commitment, typically develops over time and is associated with long-term stability (Hatfield & Walster, 1978). Theories of love, including biochemical and attachment models, provide insight into how individuals relate and bond. Attachment styles—secure, avoidant, and anxious/ambivalent—significantly influence relationship satisfaction and stability (Ainsworth, 1989).

Lee’s six styles of love further categorize love experiences—Eros (romantic love), Mania (obsessive), Ludus (playful), Storge (friendly), Agape (self-sacrificing), and Pragma (practical)—reflecting diverse cultural expressions (Lee, 1973). The Wheel Theory proposes four stages: rapport, self-disclosure, mutual dependency, and intimacy/need fulfillment, foundational for developing lasting relationships (Reiss, 1981). The triangular theory of love posits that consummate love involves intimacy, passion, and commitment, the ideal form of romantic connection (Sternberg, 1986).

Marriage and Family

People marry for various reasons, including love, companionship, social pressure, economic stability, and religious beliefs. Conversely, negative motivations include fear, obligation, or convenience. Success in marriage depends on factors such as communication, shared values, emotional support, and adaptability (Gottman & Levenson, 2000). Research indicates that interracial marriages increase social acceptance, though they face unique challenges due to cultural differences and societal biases (Feliciano, 2006).

Marriage undergoes several phases, including courtship, early marriage, mid-life stability, and later years. The most enjoyable phase is often considered the honeymoon period characterized by high passion and novelty. Happy marriages tend to feature mutual respect, shared goals, and effective conflict resolution (Waite & Gallagher, 2000).

The legal recognition of relationships varies, with common law marriage, cerimonial marriage, and fictive kin relationships providing diverse pathways for cohabitation and commitment. Issues like bigamy and kinship systems influence societal structures and individual choices. Family of origin and family of procreation dynamics shape personal development and long-term relationship patterns (Cherlin, 2009).

Changing societal trends show smaller households, increased female participation in the workforce, and diverse family structures, including platonic living arrangements and multi-generational households. These shifts impact social interactions and caregiving roles (Cherlin, 2010). Work and leisure have evolved, with increased vacation days and flexible schedules, influencing family life and social bonds.

Singlehood manifests in various forms—divorced, widowed, never married, and singles engaging in hooking up or platonic relationships. Myths about singles being lonely or unhappy are challenged by evidence showing many pursue fulfilling social and personal lives, emphasizing that singlehood can be voluntary and rewarding (Kiecolt & Friedemann, 2019).

Regarding sexual orientation, three main types are homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual. Sexual orientation differs from sexual behavior, which may be influenced by cultural and personal factors. Discrimination and prejudice, including homophobia and heterosexism, persist despite legal advances like same-sex marriage laws in some regions, including New Jersey (Herek, 2009). Understanding the biological, hormonal, and environmental factors affecting orientation continues to be a focus of research (Mustanski & Liu, 2013).

In summary, human sexuality, relationships, and family life are complex, dynamic, and influenced by myriad societal and personal factors. Recognizing these elements fosters a more inclusive understanding of diverse experiences and supports the development of healthier, more fulfilling personal and social relationships.

References

  • Ainsworth, M. D. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716.
  • Baker, A. (2008). Sexual Values and Behavior: An Introduction. Journal of Sexuality & Culture, 12(3), 45–58.
  • Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. Vintage.
  • Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 648–651.
  • Feliciano, C. (2006). Does marriage privilege or penalize interracial couples? Demography, 43(3), 459–471.
  • Finkel, E. J., et al. (2012). The sufficiency of online dating: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(2), 139–154.
  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when relationships will end. Guildford Press.
  • Hatfield, E., & Walster, G. (1978). Equity theory and love. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 151-179). Academic Press.
  • Herek, G. M. (2009). Sexual prejudice and anti-gay violence. In The psychology of hate crimes and violence (pp. 67–88). American Psychological Association.
  • Kiecolt, J. K., & Friedemann, R. M. (2019). Single and satisfied: The evolving landscape of singlehood. Journal of Family Studies, 25(2), 123–137.
  • Kirby, D. (2007). Emerging answers: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
  • Laumann, E. O., et al. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press.
  • Lee, J. A. (1973). Colors of love: The road to interpersonal harmony. Routledge.
  • Levine, J., et al. (2019). Sexuality in later life: An integrated review. The Gerontologist, 49(4), 389–399.
  • Mustanski, B., & Liu, R. T. (2013). A longitudinal study of sexual orientation development among adolescent and young adult women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(2), 177–188.
  • Reiss, A. J. (1981). Toward a general theory of love. Ivy Books.
  • Schwartz, P., & Montgomery, M. (1998). Trends and patterns in dating preferences and practices. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 320–335.
  • Shannon, D., et al. (2017). Sexual values and health outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(4), 365–370.
  • Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual scripts: Origins, influences, and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15(2), 97–120.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135.
  • Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. Doubleday.

Related Assignments