Milestone Four Data Analysis Was Conducted Using Sta

Milestone Four Data Analysisanalysis Was Conducted Using Statcrunch T

Analysis was conducted using StatCrunch to determine to what extent does gender influence the length of hospital stays for MI patients. The two variables utilized for analysis were; los (length of stay) and gender which represents the participant’s gender where 0 = females and 1 = males. Histograms were determined to explain the distribution of los and gender. Figure 1 shows the histogram for los. Analysis showed that the distributed is skewed to the right and most participants (55) had a los between 5 and 10.

Figure 2 shows a bar graph for los and gender. According to the graph, females (gender = 0) had the highest los compared to males (gender = 1). A bar graph suits the description of the distribution since the interest of the study was to determine the difference in length of stay between males and females for MI patients. Females seemed to stay longer compared to males. A two-samples t-test was conducted to check whether the differences in average los between male and female patients, were statistically significant.

Independent samples t-test can be used in a case where the dependent variable is quantitative and the independent variable is categorical with 2 groups. Table 1 shows the results of the analysis; Analysis showed that the difference in average los between males ( N =35, M = 7.8, SD = 8.92) and females ( N =65, M = 6.32, SD = 3.34) was not statistically significant where t (98) = -1.19, p = 0.24. Since the p-value was greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the difference is not different from zero. Based on analysis, the average length of stay for males ( M = 7.8) was slightly higher compared to females’ average los ( M = 6.32). The differences however, were not statistically significant which implies that the recovery speed was almost equal between males and females.

Paper For Above instruction

The analysis of the influence of gender on the length of hospital stays for patients suffering from myocardial infarction (MI) provides important insights into the dynamics of healthcare service utilization. Using statistical analysis through StatCrunch, the study examined whether there are significant differences in the duration of hospital stays based on gender, which is essential for informing healthcare policy, resource allocation, and personalized patient care.

The primary descriptive statistics involved calculating the mean and standard deviation of the length of stay (LOS) for males and females. The means indicated that on average, males had a slightly longer hospital stay (7.8 days) compared to females (6.32 days). The standard deviations, 8.92 for males and 3.34 for females, reflect greater variability in the LOS among males. These statistics help summarize the central tendency and dispersion within each gender group and form the basis for the inferential statistical test.

To explore whether the observed differences in LOS between genders are statistically significant, an independent samples t-test was employed. This test is appropriate because it compares the means of a continuous dependent variable (LOS) across two independent categorical groups (gender: male and female). The t-test evaluates whether any difference in the average LOS observed in the sample is likely to reflect a true difference in the population, or if it could be attributed to random variation. The formula for the t-test involves calculating the difference between the two sample means, divided by the standard error of the difference, which accounts for variability within each group and the sample sizes.

Visualizations such as histograms and bar graphs were used to better understand and communicate the data. The histogram for LOS revealed a right-skewed distribution, indicating that most patients had shorter stays, but some stayed significantly longer. The bar graph for LOS and gender vividly illustrated that females tend to stay longer than males, aligning with the descriptive statistics. These graphical representations are valuable for detecting data patterns and communicating findings effectively.

Results from the t-test indicated a t-value of -1.19 with 98 degrees of freedom and a p-value of 0.24. Since this p-value exceeds the conventional significance level of 0.05, the null hypothesis — that there is no difference in LOS between males and females — cannot be rejected. Therefore, statistically, gender does not influence the length of hospital stay among MI patients in this dataset. The slight difference observed in average LOS suggests that other factors not examined in this analysis may play a more substantial role in determining hospitalization duration.

Despite the non-significant results, the analysis contributes to the broader understanding of gender-related healthcare disparities. Recognizing that gender alone does not significantly affect LOS highlights the importance of investigating other potential determinants such as age, severity of MI, comorbidities, treatment protocols, and socioeconomic factors. Future research could employ multivariate analyses to accommodate these additional variables and establish more nuanced insights into patient recovery trajectories and healthcare resource needs.

In conclusion, the statistical analysis confirms that gender does not significantly impact the length of hospital stays for MI patients in the sampled population. These findings underline the importance of considering multiple factors in healthcare research and practice, and they support the ongoing need to personalize patient care beyond gender-based assumptions. Better understanding and targeted interventions can improve overall healthcare quality and patient outcomes by addressing the myriad factors influencing recovery times.

References

• Gerstman, B. B. (2015). Basic biostatistics: Statistics for public health practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & May, S. (2008). Applied survival analysis: Regression modeling of time to event data (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Pearson Education. (2014). StatCrunch (Version June 2016 update) [Computer software]. Pearson.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Laerd Statistics. (2017). Independent samples t-test. https://statistics.laerd.com/statistical-guides/independent-samples-t-test-statistical-guide.php
• Urdan, T., & Gamoran, A. (Eds.). (2016). Statistics in society: The politics of interpretation and choice. Routledge.
• Moore, D. S., McCabe, G. P., & Craig, B. A. (2012). Introduction to the practice of statistics (8th ed.). W. H. Freeman.
• Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768.