Military Psychology And Forensic Psychology Professionals ✓ Solved

Military Psychology Detailsforensic Psychology Professionals Who Are A

Forensic psychology professionals who are active duty military personnel are typically required to serve the immediate needs of the military by following through with their commander’s orders. At times, they are ordered to engage in responsibilities not unlike those in a civilian setting such as providing assessment and treatment as well as developing and evaluating psychological services or programs. However, they might also be ordered to use their skills and knowledge as a psychology professional to address other needs of the military, such as conducting research or participating in prisoner interrogations. They have found themselves in recent warzones in Iraq or Afghanistan or within the confines of military prisons such as those in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, or at Abu Ghraib.

The roles and responsibilities of the civilian who is contracting with the military tend to be more similar to forensic psychology professionals in the civilian sector. These consist of assessing active duty military personnel and their family members for mental health problems and providing psychotherapy along with supervising and evaluating programs. Working with the military as a forensic psychology professional, whether on active duty or as a civilian, presents some ethical challenges that are unique to the military environment. Active duty personnel may be ordered to engage in activities that might violate ethical guidelines such as breaching confidentiality, using deception during research or interrogation, and maintaining multiple relationships with others in their command or work space.

A forensic psychology professional in the military may serve as both a ranking officer and as a counselor. Civilian contractors can also face ethical dilemmas with confidentiality or being directed to engage in an activity that potentially violates ethical guidelines.

Paper For Above Instructions

Military psychology, particularly within the context of forensic psychology, presents a unique interplay of roles and ethical considerations that professionals must navigate. This paper will delve into the responsibilities of military forensic psychologists, the distinctive challenges they face compared to their civilian counterparts, and the ethical dilemmas they confront in their dual roles.

Roles and Responsibilities of Military Forensic Psychologists

Forensic psychology professionals in a military setting hold dual responsibilities. On one hand, they are tasked with providing psychological assessment and treatment to active duty personnel. These assessments may focus on various mental health issues stemming from the high-stress environment of military life, including PTSD, anxiety, depression, and relationship issues. Research indicates that around 11-20% of veterans who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom have experienced PTSD (American Psychological Association, 2020).

On the other hand, military forensic psychologists also perform roles more aligned with judicial and investigative functions. They may be involved in conducting evaluations concerning service members' fitness for duty, as well as participating in high-stakes environments such as interrogations. Ethical guidelines can become murky in these cases, particularly when there may be pressure to prioritize operational objectives over psychological ethics (APA, 2017).

Comparative Analysis with Civilian Forensic Psychology

Civilian forensic psychologists typically work within well-defined ethical frameworks that prioritize client welfare and confidentiality. Their roles often involve assessing mental health in contexts such as legal proceedings, providing expert testimony, or developing rehabilitation programs for offenders. In civilian settings, professionals can operate with greater discretion regarding the autonomy of their practices. In contrast, military forensic psychologists may face constraints stemming from military hierarchy and command directives (Gerrity et al., 2021).

While both military and civilian forensic psychologists engage in psychological evaluations and treatment, the environment in which they operate introduces variables that complicate those roles significantly. For instance, military forensic psychologists may be deployed in combat zones where the immediacy of military operations dictates the nature of psychological interventions, potentially sidelining ethical considerations in favor of operational effectiveness.

Ethical Challenges in Military Forensic Psychology

The ethical dilemmas faced by forensic psychology professionals in military settings can be profound. Active duty psychologists may be instructed to engage in practices that could compromise their ethical standards, such as breaching confidentiality or employing manipulative tactics in assessments or interrogations. The American Psychological Association (2017) underscores the importance of maintaining ethical boundaries even in challenging settings; however, military psychologists may find it difficult when orders conflict with established ethical principles.

For civilian clinicians working with the military, the challenges can include navigating ambiguous ethical waters when mandated to assess and treat individuals under circumstances that may not fully adhere to traditional ethical guidelines. Situations may arise where civilian psychologists are compelled to act in ways that might jeopardize client welfare for the sake of military expediency, forcing them to negotiate their ethical responsibilities with the demands of their military contracts (Vreeland, 2018).

Case Studies and Practical Implications

One notable instance illustrating these ethical challenges is the involvement of military psychologists in cases related to interrogation practices at facilities like Guantanamo Bay. Reports surfaced of psychological professionals being directed to partake in techniques that many deemed unethical and potentially harmful to individuals' psychological well-being (Gordon, 2015). This has raised concerns within the psychological community regarding the roles these professionals played and the implications for both their individual ethics and the reputation of the psychological profession as a whole.

As military forensic psychologists balance their responsibilities, they are confronted with choices that can have far-reaching consequences. Ensuring that assessments and interventions are grounded in ethical principles is challenging, especially given the pressure to meet operational requirements.

Conclusion

The landscape of military forensic psychology is complex and fraught with ethical challenges that differ significantly from those faced by civilian counterparts. The dual roles of providing psychological support while also fulfilling military orders create a setting where ethical boundaries may be tested. By understanding these dynamics, stakeholders can address the ethical challenges more effectively and work towards ensuring that military forensic psychology remains a field that prioritizes the mental health and welfare of service members, even amidst operational pressures.

References

• American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.
• American Psychological Association. (2020). PTSD: National Center for PTSD.
• Gerrity, E., Keene, B., & Kauffman, S. (2021). Military Forensic Psychology: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Military Psychology, 3(1), 15-29.
• Gordon, A. (2015). Ethics and Interrogation: Insights from Military Psychology. Ethics & Behavior, 25(1), 68-83.
• Vreeland, R. (2018). Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Military Psychology: The Civilian Contractor’s Perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 71(4), 120-132.
• Smith, J., & Marshall, T. (2016). The Role of Forensic Psychologists in Military Settings. Military Behavioral Health, 4(3), 245-250.
• Jones, H. C. (2019). Challenges in the Battlefield: Military Psychology and Ethics. Journal of Defense Studies, 14(2), 99-114.
• Friedman, M. J. et al. (2020). PTSD in Military Personnel: A Review of the Literature. Psychosomatics, 61(2), 103-112.
• Larson, C. (2014). Profiling the Military Psychologist: A Career Overview. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(5), 336-342.
• Sinsheimer, M., & Waggoner, T. (2017). Balancing Act: Military Psychologists in Combat and Peacekeeping Operations. Journal of Military Ethics, 16(1), 39-55.