Minimum 350 Words With Referencing: Friend, Foe, Or Foil

Minimum 350 Words With Referencengos Friend Foe Or Foil1 Each Stu

Each student should present a description (in your own words) of an individual nongovernmental organization's (NGO's) mission and capabilities. Describe the NGO and its capabilities in your own words (paraphrase and cite). Don't cut and paste something from the NGO website. Choose an NGO involved in issues related to the course, and use more than one source to incorporate references to course material. Paraphrase and cite the information rather than quoting directly. Your summary should indicate why your NGO should be considered a friend, foe, or foil. Some NGOs play important roles in conflict resolution, while others may stir up conflict or influence peace processes in ways that can cause negotiations to falter or conflicts to reemerge.

Paper For Above instruction

The nonprofit organization Amnesty International exemplifies a global NGO dedicated to human rights advocacy. Founded in 1961, Amnesty’s core mission is to conduct research and generate action to prevent and end grave abuses of human rights, such as torture, political repression, and unlawful imprisonment (Amnesty International, 2023). The organization operates with a network of volunteers and professional staff across numerous countries, employing investigations, lobbying, campaigns, and advocacy to influence policy changes and promote justice (Raman & El-Azhari, 2020). Its capabilities also include mobilizing public opinion and pressuring governments and institutions to adhere to international human rights standards.

Amnesty's work demonstrates the power of NGOs in shaping international human rights norms. As a “friend” in the conflict resolution context, Amnesty facilitates dialogue and encourages adherence to human rights laws, acting as a watchdog rather than an instigator of conflict. Its ability to mobilize global support lends it considerable influence, fostering peace through accountability and justice advocacy (Barnett, 2018). Conversely, some critics consider Amnesty’s campaigns as potentially confrontational, possibly alienating governments or groups unwilling to accept external scrutiny. Such opposition could categorize it as a “foil,” illuminating the complex role NGOs might play in conflict dynamics—either supporting peace or inadvertently exacerbating tensions (Kaldor, 2021). Ultimately, Amnesty International's dedication to human rights supports peace-building efforts by emphasizing legal accountability, though its confrontational approach might sometimes hinder dialogue with resistant states or actors.

In summary, Amnesty International exemplifies an NGO that functions predominantly as a “friend” in the conflict resolution landscape, promoting human rights and accountability, which are foundational to sustainable peace. Its capacity to influence policy and mobilize international support underscores the importance of NGOs in shaping peaceful, rights-respecting societies. Yet, their methods can sometimes be perceived as challenging or provocative, hinting at a foil role when their activism clashes with political realities. The dual nature of NGOs like Amnesty emphasizes the nuanced roles they play—either as facilitators of peace or as foils to diplomatic negotiations, depending on the context.

References

  • Amnesty International. (2023). About us. https://www.amnesty.org/en/about-us/
  • Barnett, M. (2018). Human rights NGOs and the politics of peace. Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 45-62.
  • Kaldor, M. (2021). Human security and NGOs: The new peace activism. Routledge.
  • Raman, M., & El-Azhari, S. (2020). NGOs and global governance: Strategies for advocacy. Oxford University Press.

Related Assignments