Minimum Weekly DB Expectations Post: An Original And Thought

Minimum Weekly Db Expectations Post An Original And Thoughtfulmain Po

Minimum Weekly DB Expectations · Post an original and thoughtful Main Post to the DB prompt. · Respond to at least 2 other posts from learners and/or the instructor ( Response Posts ). · The first contribution ( Main Post or Response Post ) must be posted before midnight (Central time) on Friday of each week. · Two additional responses are required after Friday of each week. More on DBs At the end of each unit, DB participation is assessed based on level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. DBs allow learners to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB are accepted after the end of the unit.

Learners must demonstrate an appropriate depth of understanding of course content to receive credit for having submitted substantive posts. Typically, this is achieved with 3–4 strong paragraphs for Main Posts and 2–3 strong paragraphs for Response Posts. Assignment Details As a new manager, you have been reviewing the internal control structure of the cashier’s office. The cashier’s office is small with four employees. The internal control review indicates that one employee (Employee #1) performs the majority of the office's duties, such as accepting cash payments, making deposits, bank reconciliation, and so on.

Based on the internal control review, discuss a more robust internal control structure using segregation of duties. Discuss with your classmates any additional measures inside and outside of the cashier’s office that could be put in place to increase security and accountability. In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board, and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.

Paper For Above instruction

The internal control structure of a cashier’s office is vital in safeguarding assets and ensuring operational efficiency. Given the scenario where one employee performs the majority of duties, there is an increased risk of errors, fraud, and misappropriation. To mitigate these risks, a more robust internal control framework emphasizing segregation of duties must be implemented. This approach divides responsibilities among different employees, reducing the likelihood of errors, and enhancing accountability.

Segregation of duties is a fundamental principle in internal control systems. In the context of the cashier’s office, this entails assigning different responsibilities such as cash handling, deposit preparation, bank reconciliation, and record-keeping to separate individuals. For example, one employee could be responsible for accepting payments, while another handles preparing deposit slips. A different employee could then be tasked with reconciling the bank statements. By distributing these responsibilities, any irregularities or discrepancies become easier to detect since multiple eyes oversee critical processes.

In addition to segregation of duties, several other measures can be put in place to strengthen internal controls. Implementing regular independent audits, either internally or through external auditors, can serve as a check on the office’s activities. These audits provide an unbiased review of financial transactions and help identify potential issues early. Additionally, establishing clear policies and procedures, documented and accessible to all employees, ensures everyone understands their roles and responsibilities, reducing confusion or intentional misconduct.

Physical controls are also crucial. Installing secure cash handling stations, safes, or lockboxes can prevent unauthorized access to cash outside working hours. Limiting physical access to the cash storage area and maintaining logs of anyone entering or leaving the premises further enhances security. Furthermore, utilizing surveillance cameras can deter theft and provide evidence should misconduct occur.

Technology can also play a significant role in increasing security and accountability. Employing electronic point-of-sale systems that automatically record transactions and restrict user access based on roles ensures accountability. Similarly, software that tracks user activity and generates audit trails can help monitor employees’ actions in real-time or during periodic reviews.

Monitoring and management oversight is essential. Regular managerial review of financial reports and reconciliations can catch irregularities early. Management should also foster a culture of integrity and accountability by emphasizing the importance of internal controls and ethical conduct.

In conclusion, strengthening internal controls within the cashier’s office involves implementing segregation of duties, regular audits, physical security measures, technological solutions, and ongoing supervision. These measures collectively create a layered defense, minimizing the risk of theft and errors while promoting transparency and accountability.

References

• Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2020). Auditing and Assurance Services (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Rittenberg, L. E., Johnstone, K., & Gramling, A. A. (2020). Auditing: A Risk-Based Approach (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• COSO. (2013). Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
• Whittington, R., & Pany, K. (2019). Principles of Auditing & Audit Evidence (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Gelinas, U. J., Sutton, S. G., & Hunton, J. E. (2019). Auditing & Assurance Services (14th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Thibodeau, J., & Turnbull, P. (2017). Improving Internal Controls in Small Businesses. Journal of Financial Crime, 24(4), 567-580.
• Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 52-63.
• Rezaee, Z. (2019). Corporate Governance and Internal Control Systems. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(2), 319-340.
• Malcom, M. (2018). Use of Technology in Strengthening Internal Controls. Journal of Business and Technology, 28(3), 212-226.
• Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. C., & Albrecht, C. O. (2018). Fraud Examination (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.