Mobile Application Development To Be Able To Accomplish This

1mobile Application Developmentto Be Able To Accomplish This Project

To successfully develop a mobile application, it is essential to plan and execute various stages of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Two widely used SDLC models are the waterfall model and the agile model, each offering different approaches, advantages, and challenges. A project manager should understand these models thoroughly to select the most appropriate framework for the project at hand.

Waterfall Model Outline

The waterfall model is a linear and sequential approach that divides the development process into six distinct phases: requirements, design, implementation, testing, maintenance, and installation. First, the requirements phase involves gathering information about the application's needed functionalities, performance metrics, interfaces, and behaviors. Methods such as questionnaires, interviews, observation, and sampling are employed to gather these requirements, typically taking around 21 days. Next, the design phase creates data structures, software architecture, interface storyboards, and algorithms, estimated to take approximately 14 days.

The implementation phase involves actual coding and unit testing, usually completed within one week. Following this, system testing occurs over roughly two weeks, ensuring the application functions as intended across various scenarios. Deployment entails installation and distribution, which can take about one week, with ongoing maintenance to address bugs, updates, and user feedback occurring continually.

A Gantt chart depicting the waterfall process schedules activities from May 25 to July 22, including requirement analysis, design, implementation, testing, and deployment. The detailed schedule ensures clear milestones and deadlines for each development stage.

Agile Model Outline

The agile development approach is suited for projects where time is critical and requirements may evolve during development. Unlike the waterfall model, agile emphasizes iterative cycles, or sprints, typically lasting seven days, focusing on high-level planning, analysis, design, development, testing, and delivery. Methodologies such as Scrum, Crystal Clear, and Extreme Programming (XP) exemplify agile practices, with each emphasizing collaboration, flexibility, and rapid delivery.

For instance, when employing XP, each iteration involves analyzing user requirements, designing solutions, coding, and testing, with prototypes released at the end of each cycle. This iterative process allows continuous feedback from users, enabling modifications based on their needs and preferences, which leads to more flexible and user-centered development.

The agile Gantt chart spans from May 25 to July 10, dividing activities into high-level planning, iterative cycles, and final product release. Agile's incremental approach allows the project team to adapt to changing requirements efficiently and deliver functional components early, providing value to users throughout the development process.

Differences Between Waterfall and Agile Models

Fundamentally, the waterfall model organizes the development process into fixed, sequential phases, which can be rigid and less accommodating to change once a phase is completed. Conversely, agile promotes flexibility by dividing the project into sprints, encouraging continuous improvement and stakeholder involvement. The waterfall model is typically internal and documentation-heavy, with minimal client interaction during development, whereas agile emphasizes ongoing collaboration with customers to ensure that the final product aligns closely with user needs.

While waterllow is suitable for projects with well-defined requirements and minimal expected change, agile is better suited for dynamic environments where requirements evolve and rapid delivery is essential. Agile’s iterative nature makes it particularly effective at addressing uncertainties related to customer needs and changing market conditions, focusing on delivering usable increments of the product at each stage.

Addressing Complexity and Uncertainty in Agile

Agile primarily tackles uncertainty through continuous stakeholder involvement and iterative development cycles. By involving users throughout the process, it reduces the risk of developing a product that does not meet expectations, enabling adjustments early and often. Empirical observation, frequent testing, and feedback loops allow the development team to adapt to emerging requirements or unforeseen complications efficiently.

However, while agile excels at managing uncertainties related to requirements and stakeholder needs, it does less to directly address complexity inherent in technical or architectural challenges. Complex technical problems often require additional planning and design strategies beyond the scope of agile practices, such as incorporating architecture reviews or technical spike prototypes.

In conclusion, choosing between the waterfall and agile SDLC models depends heavily on project-specific factors such as requirements stability, time constraints, stakeholder involvement, and the nature of the development environment. Agile offers significant advantages in environments characterized by uncertainty and evolving requirements, fostering adaptability and collaboration, whereas waterfall can be a reliable approach for projects with clear, unchanging specifications.

By understanding these models' strengths and limitations, project managers can better tailor their development strategies to ensure successful mobile application delivery that meets user expectations and adapts to the dynamic technological landscape.

References

• Boehm, B. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer, 21(5), 61-72.
• Highsmith, J. (2002). agile software development ecosystems. Addison-Wesley.
• Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Business.
• Sharma, A., & Singh, M. (2020). Comparing Waterfall and Agile Software Development Methodologies. International Journal of Computer Applications, 175(20), 17-24.
• Scrum Alliance. (2020). Scrum Guide. Retrieved from https://scrumguides.org
• Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Sommerville, I. (2016). Software Engineering (10th Edition). Pearson.
• Beck, K. (2000). Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley.
• Basili, V. R., & Rombach, H. D. (1988). The TAME project: Towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(6), 758-773.
• Leffingwell, D. (2011). Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley.