Mod 1 Due 7/7/2017 Using The Criteria In The Prospectus Temp

Mod 1 Due 7 7 2017using The Criteria In The Prospectus Template How W

Using the criteria in the prospectus template, how would you evaluate your work to date if you were using the assessment criteria to complete the assignment rubric and grade this assignment? Why?

The "Dissertation Milestone Guide" indicates that Chapter 2 (Literature Review) and Chapter 3 (Methodology) of the proposal will be developed prior to Chapter 1. Explain why it is important to complete Chapter 2 before completing Chapter 1 and Chapter 3 in the proposal. What additional questions do you have on the step-by-step dissertation process and deliverables outlined in the "Dissertation Milestone Guide?"

Paper For Above instruction

The evaluation of my progress to date, based on the criteria outlined in the prospectus template, involves a critical reflection on the quality, comprehensiveness, and alignment of my work with the expectations set forth in the assessment rubric. Typically, the rubric assesses various dimensions such as clarity of research problem, review of literature, theoretical framework, methodology, and overall coherence of the proposal. Given the current status of my work, I would consider myself to be in the intermediate stage, having established a foundational understanding of my research topic, completed preliminary literature review, and drafted initial research questions and objectives.

Specifically, my work demonstrates adherence to the guidelines regarding clarity of purpose and scope. The literature review, although ongoing, has identified pertinent sources and themes that underpin my research. The methodology section has been outlined, with initial considerations of research design, data collection methods, and analysis strategies. However, there remain areas requiring further refinement—including in-depth analysis of the literature, articulation of hypotheses or research questions, and detailed methodological procedures. Using the assessment criteria, I would evaluate my current work as progressing but not yet fully meeting all expectations for a comprehensive proposal, highlighting areas for improvement such as more robust literature synthesis and clearer articulation of methodology.

The reason for this evaluative approach stems from the understanding that reflective assessment enables identification of strengths and gaps, thereby guiding subsequent work to meet academic standards. Engaging critically with the assessment criteria ensures alignment with the expectations of scholarly research, fostering a systematic approach to refining the proposal for higher quality outcomes.

Regarding the "Dissertation Milestone Guide," it emphasizes that Chapters 2 (Literature Review) and 3 (Methodology) should be developed prior to Chapter 1 (Introduction). This sequencing might seem counterintuitive, but it is grounded in the strategic logic of dissertation development. Building the literature review and methodology first ensures that the researcher has a solid grounding in the existing scholarly context and the appropriate research design before finalizing the introduction. By understanding the scope and depth of existing research (Chapter 2) and the methods for investigating the research questions (Chapter 3), the researcher can define a more precise and feasible research problem in Chapter 1 that aligns with the established scholarly context and methodological framework.

Furthermore, developing Chapters 2 and 3 early allows for iterative refinement of the research focus and methods, preventing the need for significant revisions after the introduction is drafted. It also facilitates the identification of potential gaps, ethical considerations, and resource implications earlier in the process, leading to a more coherent and well-structured research proposal.

Additional questions I have regarding the step-by-step dissertation process include clarifying the specific sequence of revisions from initial drafts to final submission, understanding how to effectively integrate feedback from advisors at each stage, and knowing the best practices for aligning each chapter to ensure logical flow and coherence. I am also interested in detailed timelines for each milestone and guidance on managing potential overlaps or delays in completing the subsequent chapters, especially in balancing literature review depth with methodological rigor.

In sum, completing Chapters 2 and 3 prior to Chapter 1 provides a practical framework for developing a focused, feasible, and academically sound research proposal. It ensures that each chapter supports the others and that the dissertation as a whole is coherent and methodologically robust, ultimately enhancing the credibility and scholarly contribution of the research.

References

• Bell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-Time Researchers. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• JJ, O., & Smith, L. (2015). The Dissertation Journey: A Practical and Comprehensive Guide to Planning, Writing, and Defending Your Dissertation. Sage Publications.
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International.
• Liamputtong, P. (2013). Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Schindler, S. (2017). Developing a Research Proposal. Journal of Academic Research, 5(2), 123-139.
• Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Wiley.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.