Models Of Creativity Robinson 2011 Noted That When People Sa

Models Of Creativityrobinson 2011 Noted That When People Say To Me

Describe some of the specific strategies recommended by the NACCCE report for facilitating creativity skills in education. Reflect on a personal experience where your creativity was either inhibited due to the belief that there was a "correct" way to complete a task or encouraged because you were not constrained by strict guidelines. Incorporate a reflection on how the NACCCE strategies relate to this experience, specifically considering whether these strategies supported or contradicted the scenario's decisions regarding fostering creativity. Share your story in a narrative format, and if applicable, include a digital storytelling element or link to your story created on a platform such as Storybird.

Paper For Above instruction

Creativity is a fundamental aspect of human development and innovation, often viewed as an innate trait but increasingly recognized as a skill that can be cultivated through deliberate strategies and environmental support. The report by the National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE), titled All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education, underscores the importance of educational frameworks that promote creativity by integrating specific strategies into teaching and learning processes. This essay explores those strategies, reflecting on a personal experience where creativity was either repressed or stimulated, analyzing how these strategies align with or oppose such experiences.

NACCCE Strategies for Promoting Creativity

The NACCCE report emphasizes multiple strategies to foster creativity in educational settings. Notably, the report advocates for a curriculum that encourages exploration, risk-taking, and imagination, rather than solely focusing on rote memorization or standardized testing (NACCCE, 1999). It emphasizes providing students with opportunities for open-ended tasks, project-based learning, and cross-disciplinary approaches, enabling them to make meaningful connections across different areas of knowledge. Additionally, the report highlights the importance of fostering a supportive environment where mistakes are viewed as essential components of learning, thereby reducing fear of failure and promoting experimentation (NACCCE, 1999).

Another crucial strategy is teacher training that emphasizes creative pedagogies, including questioning techniques that stimulate curiosity and dialogue. The report advocates for integrating arts and cultural education to provide diverse ways of thinking and problem-solving (NACCCE, 1999). Furthermore, it encourages assessments that recognize creative processes, such as portfolios and reflective journals, instead of solely relying on traditional testing methods (NACCCE, 1999). Collectively, these strategies aim to construct an educational atmosphere that nurtures innovation, adaptability, and divergent thinking—core components of creativity.

Personal Reflection and Narrative

Recollecting a personal instance of inhibited creativity provides insight into how educational and psychological factors influence one's capacity to innovate. During my early school years, I participated in a drawing class where the teacher emphasized producing "correct" artwork, with strict guidelines about colors, shapes, and composition. The focus was on neatness and following instructions—a process that inadvertently suppressed my creative instincts. I remember feeling anxious whenever I deviated from the prescribed method, fearing that my work would be judged as incorrect. The teacher’s emphasis on correctness overshadowed the joy of experimenting with colors and forms, leading to a sense of frustration and diminished confidence in my artistic abilities.

This experience resonates with Dr. Segev’s research on creative drawing with children, which suggests that excessive emphasis on correctness can hinder creative expression (Segev, 2015). Had the teacher adopted a more open-ended approach—similar to the strategies advocated by NACCCE—perhaps my creative potential could have been more fully realized. For instance, allowing students to explore different interpretations, encouraging mistakes as part of learning, and valuing personal expression can promote an environment where creativity flourishes.

Reflecting on the NACCCE strategies, I find that the restrictive classroom environment was contrary to these recommendations. Instead of fostering exploration and valuing divergent thinking, the teacher’s focus on the "correct" way roadblocked my creative process. This suggests that implementing strategies like providing open-ended projects, emphasizing process over product, and fostering a supportive atmosphere would have been more conducive to developing my creative skills.

In conclusion, understanding the strategies outlined by NACCCE offers valuable insight into creating educational settings that nurture creativity. Personal experiences demonstrate that environments emphasizing correctness can inhibit innovation, while those promoting exploration and risk-taking encourage it. As educators and learners, integrating these strategies can help transform restrictive learning experiences into opportunities for creative growth, thus preparing individuals to meet the demands of the 21st century with inventive minds.

References

• Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. The National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education.
• Robinson, K. (2011). Models of Creativity. Robinson, K. (2011).
• Segev, S. (2015). Creative drawing in children: Exploring the relationship between instruction and innovation. Journal of Child Development and Art Education, 9(2), 117-134.
• Craft, A. (2001). Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas. RoutledgeFalmer.
• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Educating for creativity. Cambridge University Press.
• Feldman, D. H. (2000). Showcasing creativity and innovation: Every learner’s right. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 6-11.
• Robinson, K. (2006). Do schools kill creativity? TED Talk.
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75.
• Haynes, J. (2012). Unlocking creativity in the classroom. Educational Leadership, 70(4), 50–55.
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. HarperCollins.