Modern History Sourcebook: Rudyard Kipling The White Man's B

Modern History Sourcebookrudyard Kipling The White Mans Burden 189

Modern History Sourcebook: Rudyard Kipling, The White Man's Burden, 1899. This famous poem, written by Britain's imperial poet, was a response to the American takeover of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War. It advocates for the duty of Western powers to civilize and govern "sullen" and "half-devil and half-child" peoples, emphasizing the burdens and responsibilities associated with imperialism. The poem describes imperialism as a moral and civilizational mission, involving sacrifice, perseverance, and the acceptance of blame and hatred from those they govern.

Jules Ferry, in his speech to the French National Assembly on July 28, 1883, articulates a rationale for French colonial expansion rooted in economic, civilizational, and political ideas. Ferry emphasizes the importance of colonies for economic development, particularly as markets for French industry, citing barriers faced in Europe and protectionist policies abroad. He argues that civilizing missions justify imperialism, asserting that superior races have a duty to civilize inferior ones, a justification he frames as a moral obligation rather than mere conquest. Ferry also highlights the strategic necessity of colonies for naval and military reasons, emphasizing that maritime power and colonial possessions are essential for national greatness and international influence. He criticizes peaceful isolation as a path to decline and advocates for active imperial expansion as vital to France's prosperity and prestige.

Paper For Above instruction

The late 19th and early 20th centuries marked an era of intense European and American imperialism, driven by a combination of economic interests, racial ideologies, strategic concerns, and a civilizational mission. Rudyard Kipling’s poem "The White Man’s Burden" (1899) encapsulates the paternalistic attitude that justified colonial expansion under the guise of a moral duty to "civilize" the supposedly inferior peoples of Asia, Africa, and the Pacific. Conversely, Jules Ferry’s speech to the French National Assembly in 1883 articulates a multifaceted rationale for colonialism that combines economic necessity, civilizing mission, and geopolitical strategy. Both texts reveal the ideological underpinnings of imperialism, revealing how Western powers perceived their expansion as both a duty and a privilege.

Kipling’s "The White Man’s Burden" is emblematic of the paternalistic and racialized rhetoric that justified imperialism. The poem exhorts the "white man" to take responsibility for governing non-European peoples, whom Kipling depicts as "half-devil and half-child" — a dehumanizing portrayal that rationalizes domination and exploitation. Kipling suggests that this effort involves sacrifice, patience, and acceptance of blame, while also acknowledging the burdensome and thankless nature of imperial rule. The poem’s tone is both moral and utilitarian, asserting that civilizing the "fluttered folk" is a moral obligation that benefits both colonizer and colonized, albeit through hardship and sacrifice (Hochschild, 1998).

These ideas reflect the racial hierarchies pervasive in the discourse of empire, which posited the supposed superiority of Western civilization. This paternalism was used to endorse practices such as the suppression of local cultures and the imposition of Western customs, laws, and religion. Kipling’s emphasis on the civilizing mission aligns with prevailing imperial ideologies that saw Western rule as a benevolent act, despite its often violent and oppressive realities (Said, 1978; p. 44).

Jules Ferry’s speech demonstrates how colonial expansion was also justified within the political and economic frameworks of nation-states. Ferry argues that imperialism is necessary for economic growth, especially as European markets face increasing barriers at home and abroad. He emphasizes the importance of colonies for securing export markets, citing the need for strategic naval bases for defense and projection of power, as well as the civilizing mission, which he believes is a moral duty of "superior races" (Ferry, 1883). His rhetoric reflects a pragmatic approach: colonies serve both economic interests and national prestige, reinforcing the idea that greatness requires active expansion.

Ferry’s condemnation of peaceful isolation underscores the belief that national decline results from passivity in the face of rising competitors. The strategic significance of colonies like Tunisia, Saigon, and Madagascar illustrates how imperialism was intertwined with military and geopolitical considerations. For Ferry, colonial possessions are essential to maintaining maritime dominance and ensuring the projection of national power, echoing the arguments of contemporary imperial strategists (Betts, 1998).

The racial and civilizational justifications advanced by Ferry and Kipling reveal a worldview rooted in racial superiority and hierarchical distinctions between "civilized" and "uncivilized" peoples. These ideas facilitated the dehumanization and exploitation of colonized populations, often masking violent suppression under the guise of moral duty and progress (Said, 1978). Such discourses contributed to the acceptance of imperial violence, including forced labor, cultural suppression, and military conquest.

Furthermore, both texts reflect the broader context of the "Scramble for Africa" and other colonial conquests driven by European rivalries. The pursuit of colonies was seen as vital for national prestige and economic security, fueling imperial competition. The justification of empire as a civilizational mission helped garner public and political support for colonial ventures, even as their destructive consequences became evident (Hochschild, 1998; Pakenham, 1991).

In conclusion, the ideological underpinnings of imperialism during this period—articulated through Kipling’s poetic call and Ferry’s political speech—highlight a convergence of racial superiority, civilizational responsibility, strategic interests, and economic necessity. These justifications served to normalize and legitimize the often brutal realities of empire, shaping international relations and domestic policies. Recognizing these narratives is essential to understanding the complex legacy of colonialism, which continues to influence global dynamics today.

References

• Betts, P. (1998). The Scramble for Africa: Darfur and the End of Empire. Routledge.
• Ferry, J. (1883). Speech to the French National Assembly, July 28.
• Hochschild, A. (1998). King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa. Houghton Mifflin.
• Pakenham, T. (1991). The Scramble for Africa. Abacus.
• Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage Books.