Module 3 Live Discussion Questions: What Stood Out Most To Y

Module 3 Live Discussion Questionswhat Stood Out Most To You Fromtrau

What stood out most to you from: Trauma podcast with Resmaa Menakem? Introduction to Cultural Safety course? What do you want to learn more about? What are the implications of the level of trust on the quality of care a patient receives? What can we do to engender patient trust?

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion prompts from Module 3 highlight critical aspects of understanding trauma, cultural safety, and trust within healthcare settings. The podcast featuring Resmaa Menakem sheds light on the profound impact of racialized trauma and the importance of addressing embodied trauma in healing practices. Menakem emphasizes that trauma is not only psychological but also physiological, stored within the body, and influenced by historical and racial contexts, which profoundly affects patient and provider interactions. This understanding underscores the necessity for healthcare professionals to develop cultural humility and trauma-informed care approaches that recognize these deep-seated experiences.

The introduction to the Cultural Safety course further expands on these ideas, emphasizing that cultural safety goes beyond cultural competence. It involves creating an environment where patients feel respected, valued, and safe, regardless of their cultural background. Cultural safety requires health providers to reflect critically on power imbalances and their own biases, as well as to foster an environment of mutual respect. This approach aims to reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes by ensuring that care is person-centered and culturally affirming.

Learning more about the physiological effects of trauma and how cultural safety practices can mitigate these impacts is vital. Gaining knowledge about effective communication strategies, community engagement, and policy development will enhance clinicians' ability to provide compassionate and equitable care. Additionally, exploring the role of systemic inequities in health disparities can illuminate pathways for advocacy and structural change.

The level of trust between healthcare providers and patients is paramount in determining the quality of care. Trust influences patient engagement, adherence to treatment, and willingness to share sensitive information. When patients trust their providers, they are more likely to follow medical advice, disclose important health information, and feel satisfied with their care experience. Conversely, mistrust rooted in historical injustices, systemic racism, or previous negative encounters can lead to delayed care, non-compliance, and poorer health outcomes. Therefore, trust acts as a foundational component for effective therapeutic relationships and health equity.

Building and maintaining patient trust involves multiple strategies. Healthcare professionals can demonstrate empathy, actively listen, and communicate transparently. Acknowledging historical and cultural context, especially concerning marginalized communities, helps validate patients' experiences and fosters trust. Consistently providing respectful, non-judgmental care and involving patients in decision-making processes also reinforce trust. Moreover, organizational initiatives such as cultural safety training, community partnerships, and policies that address bias can create systemic change that promotes trust at a broader level.

In conclusion, understanding trauma and cultural safety enriches healthcare providers' capacity to deliver equitable and compassionate care. Enhancing trust through culturally sensitive practices and trauma-informed approaches is essential for improving health outcomes and reducing disparities. As healthcare continues to evolve, integrating these principles into practice will be crucial for fostering a healthcare environment where all patients feel safe, respected, and valued.

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
• Dutta, M. J. (2011). Communicating health: Charting a course for health communication to the future. Health Communication, 26(4), 267-269.
• Freeman, M. (2010). Defining cultural safety and cultural competence. Medical Education, 44(11), 1058-1059.
• Ginsburg, D. (2020). Trauma and understanding trauma-informed care. Journal of Health Psychology, 25(10), 1395-1398.
• Hook, J. N., Davis, D. E., Owen, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2013). Rapport in multicultural counseling relationships: An integrated review. Journal of Counseling & Development, 91(4), 439-449.
• Resmaa Menakem. (2017). My Grandmother's Hands: Racialized Trauma and the Pathway to Mending Our Hearts and Bodies. Central Recovery Press.
• Truong, M., Paradies, Y., & Priest, N. (2014). Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: A systematic review. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 38(3), 237-245.
• WHO. (2016). Framework for culturally safe health care. World Health Organization.
• Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 20-47.
• Zerubavel, E. (1981). The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 7(4), 387-402.