Module 4: Role Of Allied Professionals And References
Module 4 Slprole Of Allied Professionalreferences At Least Two Refe
Identify and discuss the duties and responsibilities of a pharmacist toward a patient. Based upon your research and assessment of the case, did Robert Courtney perform the required duties and uphold patient rights? What is the impact of Robert Courtney's actions on the patient and community? What precautions can be taken to ensure these types of incidents by allied professionals don’t happen to others? Should there be more regulations in place?
Paper For Above instruction
The role of allied health professionals, particularly pharmacists, is critical in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and rights of patients within the healthcare system. Pharmacists are entrusted with a fundamental duty to provide safe medication management, accurate information, and ethical care. Their responsibilities extend beyond dispensing medications to include patient education, medication therapy management, and safeguarding patient rights. Such duties are underpinned by professional ethics, legal standards, and the overarching goal of promoting public health.
In the context of the Robert Courtney case, these responsibilities were severely compromised. Robert Courtney, a licensed pharmacist, was convicted of diluting chemotherapy drugs, which led to patient harm and a breach of trust. Pharmacists, as part of their duty of care, are expected to ensure the quality and safety of the medications they dispense. According to the American Pharmacists Association (2019), pharmacists have an ethical obligation to prioritize patient safety, ensure medication accuracy, and adhere strictly to legal regulations. Courtney’s actions, which involved adulterating chemotherapy drugs, directly violated these responsibilities, resulting in compromised patient health, loss of confidence in healthcare providers, and widespread community concern.
The impact of Courtney’s misconduct was profound. Patients not only suffered physical harm due to sub-therapeutic doses but also experienced emotional distress and a loss of trust in healthcare professionals. The community was deeply affected, as the case cast a shadow over the pharmacy profession, prompting questions about regulation, oversight, and professional accountability. Such incidents underscore the potential dangers when healthcare professionals abdicate their ethical duties and engage in criminal activities.
To prevent similar incidents, several precautions can be implemented. First, rigorous regulatory oversight must be maintained by licensing authorities. Regular audits and inspections can detect irregularities early. Pharmacists should participate in ongoing professional development that emphasizes ethics, legal responsibilities, and patient safety. The implementation of advanced tracking systems for medication dispensing can further reduce the risk of adulteration or tampering. Additionally, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability within pharmacy settings can encourage reporting of unethical practices before harm occurs.
There is also an ongoing debate about the need for enhanced regulations. Advocates argue that stricter licensing requirements, mandatory reporting of medication errors or irregularities, and harsher penalties for violations could deter misconduct. The Courtney case revealed vulnerabilities within existing systems, prompting calls for more comprehensive regulation and oversight measures. Increased regulatory oversight not only protects patients but also bolsters public confidence in the healthcare system. However, some argue that excessive regulation might inhibit professional autonomy and innovation, suggesting a balanced approach is essential.
In conclusion, pharmacists and allied health professionals have a vital duty to uphold high standards of ethical and professional conduct. The Robert Courtney case highlights the devastating consequences when these duties are neglected. Strengthening regulatory frameworks, fostering ethical cultures within organizations, and implementing preventative safeguards are essential steps to protect patients and communities. Ensuring these professionals act with integrity and accountability is fundamental to maintaining trust and safety in healthcare delivery.
References
- American Pharmacists Association. (2019). Code of Ethics for Pharmacists. Retrieved from https://www.pharmacist.com
- GINSBURG, L. (2014). Ethical issues in pharmacy practice. Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 27(4), 350-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190014529403
- McDonough, R. P., & Doucette, W. R. (2001). Perspectives of community pharmacy practitioners on their role in pharmaceutical care. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 35(10), 1333-1339.
- American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. (2020). Standard of Practice for Pharmacists. ASHP.
- Leape, L. L., & Berwick, D. M. (2005). Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(19), 2384-2390.
- Furuno, J. P., & Pimentel, L. (2012). Ethical issues in pharmacy medication management. Pharmacy Practice, 10(4), 241-249.
- Mattingly, T. J., & Mckee, R. (2017). Improving pharmacy safety through regulation and policy. Healthcare Policy Review, 13(2), 78-85.
- Varkey, P., & Tickle, P. (2021). Enhancing pharmaceutical regulation to prevent drug adulteration. The Journal of Healthcare Regulation, 25(3), 157-165.
- WHO Expert Committee. (2014). Ethical principles for health-related research involving humans. WHO.
- Hoffman, K., & Orlando, N. (2018). Strengthening regulation of pharmacy practices: Strategies for improving patient safety. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 26(2), 123-130.