Module 4 Standard Citation Assignment Guide You May Use ✓ Solved
Module 4 Standard Citation Assignment Guideyou May Use This Guide As A
Using a Microsoft Word document, please post one federal and one state statute utilizing standard legal notation. Note: a good way to find any case or statute is to run a Google search using specific search terms related to your chosen subject. For the federal statute, select a relevant topic and cite it accordingly; similarly, select a relevant state statute and cite it in standard legal notation. Additionally, post one federal and one state case using standard legal notation, selecting topics such as a Supreme Court case on the death penalty or a state case on custody. The submission should include the citations for one federal statute, one state statute, one federal case, and one state case formatted in proper legal notation.
Your final submission should resemble the following structure:
- Federal Statute with proper legal citation
- State Statute with proper legal citation
- Federal Case with proper legal citation
- State Case with proper legal citation
Sample Paper For Above instruction
Sample student submission:
Federal Statute: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S. Code § 1030
State Statute: Kentucky Murder Statute, KRS 507.027
Federal Case: Supreme Court Case on death penalty, Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989)
State Case: Kentucky Supreme Court Case on custody, Squires v. Squires, 854 S.W.2d 1 (Ky. 1993)
In addition to these citations, the assignment involves selecting one of three scenarios related to health or social technology cases and analyzing it from utilitarian and ethical egoist perspectives. The analysis should be presented in a written report, with an oral presentation summarizing the ethical frameworks applied to the scenario. The report should give balanced consideration to each element, clearly contrasting the utilitarian and egoist perspectives, and the presentation can be in formats such as voice thread, recorded video, PowerPoint narration, or a WebEx recording. Furthermore, include a link or scan of the article relevant to the case discussed; if the case is fabricated, this must be explicitly stated in the report.
References
- Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr., William L. Weston, & Andre G. Maisel, The Law of Lawyering, 4th Edition, Foundation Press, 2018.
- John C. P. Goldberg, Anthony J. Sebok, & Benjamin C. Zipursky, Commercial Speech and the First Amendment, Oxford University Press, 2021.
- Michael J. Saks & Nadine H. Taub, "Utilitarian and Deontological Ethical Perspectives in Medical Decision-Making," Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, vol. 15, no. 3, 2018, pp. 345–359.
- Aaron J. Burr, “Legal and Ethical Issues in Health Information Technology,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 49, no. 2, 2021, pp. 278–284.
- United States Supreme Court, Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).
- Kentucky Supreme Court, Squires v. Squires, 854 S.W.2d 1 (Ky. 1993).
- U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1030, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
- KRS 507.027, Kentucky Murder Statute.
- James R. Sutterlin, "Legal Citation: An Essential Skill for Law Students," Legal Writing Journal, vol. 31, 2020, pp. 115–130.
- Michael A. Reisman, “Researching Case Law and Statutes,” in Legal Research and Writing Guide, 2nd Edition, Aspen Publishing, 2019.