Module 6 DQ 1, 8, 10, 17 Using The Criteria Shown

Module 6 Dq 1 8 10 17using The Criteria Shown For Each Of The Sections

Module 6 DQ Using the criteria shown for each of the sections of your Proposal in the Dissertation Proposal Template, how would you evaluate your work to date if you were completing the Proposal Rubric on yourself? Why? Module 6 DQ The focus for the next couple of weeks needs to be completing a revised draft of your Proposal. Post an update of your progress on your dissertation proposal. How will you work with your chair to help complete this revised draft? What do you need to do to complete this draft? What challenges have you encountered while working on your proposal this week?

Paper For Above instruction

The process of developing a comprehensive dissertation proposal is a critical step in the doctoral journey, requiring careful self-assessment and strategic planning. Reflecting on the progress made to date using the provided criteria for each section of the proposal offers valuable insight into the strengths and areas for improvement, facilitating targeted revisions that enhance the overall quality of the work.

Evaluating my work to date against the proposal rubric involves examining key components such as the clarity of the research problem, the alignment and justification of the research questions, the depth and appropriateness of the literature review, and the methodological rigor. For the problem statement, I believe I have articulated a clear and compelling rationale that highlights the significance of the study. Regarding the literature review, I have summarized relevant sources and identified gaps that justify the research focus. However, I recognize the need to deepen the synthesis of existing research to more convincingly demonstrate the study's contribution.

In terms of methodology, I have outlined a suitable research design, but I need to refine details about data collection and analysis procedures to ensure feasibility and adherence to best practices. Overall, I would rate my proposal as progressing well, but with notable areas for enhancement, particularly in integrating literature more cohesively and elaborating on methodological specifics. These reflections inform my revision strategy, aiming to strengthen weak areas and clarify key aspects of the proposal.

As I move forward in the next few weeks, my primary focus is on completing a revised draft of the proposal. To accomplish this, I plan to collaborate closely with my dissertation chair by scheduling regular consultations to seek feedback, clarify expectations, and troubleshoot challenges. Open communication will be vital for refining each section, especially the problem statement, literature review, and methodology.

Working with my chair involves sharing drafts for review, discussing suggested revisions, and aligning on the scope and depth of each section. I intend to develop a clear timeline for revisions, setting specific goals for each upcoming meeting to ensure steady progress. Using their expertise and guidance will help me identify gaps, avoid common pitfalls, and improve the overall coherence of the proposal.

To complete this draft, I need to finish further literature synthesis, specify data collection methods, and tighten the articulation of my research questions. I also need to ensure proper formatting and adherence to the university’s guidelines. Challenges during this process include time management, balancing multiple academic responsibilities, and addressing feedback effectively. Additionally, I have encountered difficulties in refining the scope of my research to ensure it is both manageable and impactful.

Overcoming these challenges will involve prioritizing tasks based on deadlines, seeking timely feedback, and possibly revising my research scope to align better with available resources and timeline constraints. I recognize that revision is an iterative process, and patience, along with diligent effort, will be essential for producing a comprehensive and compelling dissertation proposal.

References

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.
• Palinkas, L. A., et al. (2015). Mixed method designs in implementation research. Implementation Science, 10(1), 1-14.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
• Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The Craft of Research. University of Chicago Press.
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods. Pearson.
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
• Schutt, R. K. (2012). Investigating the Social World: The Process and Practice of Research. SAGE Publications.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. SAGE Publications.