Module 61 In Module 4: We Considered Mary's Interest In Doin

Module 61in Module 4 We Considered Marys Interest In Doing A Study

In this context, Mary is interested in investigating how background noise levels affect the learning outcomes of 6th-grade students during a math lesson. Initially, she considered using two noise conditions and analyzing the results with a t-test for independent groups, which compares the means of two separate groups. However, to better understand the effects of multiple noise levels and to explore differences among more than two conditions, she might consider using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for independent groups.

The independent variable in Mary's study is the background noise level. Specifically, it would involve varying the environmental noise conditions under which students learn the math lesson. For example, Mary could create three or more different noise conditions such as: (1) no background noise (quiet environment), (2) moderate background noise, and (3) high background noise. In this setup, each group of students would be exposed to only one noise level, making the groups independent, and the ANOVA would compare the mean learning scores across these different conditions to ascertain if noise level significantly impacts learning outcomes.

To implement this study, classes of 6th graders could be randomly assigned to each noise condition to prevent selection bias. The conditions could include a silent environment, a room with low-level ambient noise, and a setting with loud, distracting noise. The use of multiple conditions allows for examining whether increasing noise levels correlate with decreasing learning performance, and ANOVA is statistically suited for analyzing differences across three or more independent groups.

The dependent variable (DV) in Mary's study is the measure of learning outcomes after the math lesson. To quantify this variable on a continuous scale, Mary could administer a standardized test or assessment that yields a numerical score for each student. For example, a multiple-choice test with multiple questions can produce a total score ranging from 0 to the maximum number of questions answered correctly. This scoring method provides a continuous measurement scale, as scores can vary incrementally and are not limited to categorical values. This facilitates precise statistical analysis, such as calculating means and variances, which are essential components of ANOVA.

Ensuring that the test is reliable and valid is critical. The test should be designed to reflect the key learning objectives of the lesson, and scoring should be standardized so that each participant's score reliably measures their understanding of the math content. By obtaining a single, continuous numerical score per participant, Mary can accurately compare the average learning outcomes across the different noise conditions, enabling her to determine if background noise significantly influences learning.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Repeated Measures Design

Considering a repeated measures design, where the same group of students experiences all different noise conditions, has both advantages and disadvantages. One major advantage is increased statistical power because each participant acts as their own control. This reduces variability caused by individual differences in learning ability or background knowledge, making it easier to detect true effects of noise levels. Moreover, fewer participants are required because each person completes multiple conditions, which can be more practical and cost-effective.

However, there are notable disadvantages. Carryover effects pose a significant concern; exposure to one noise condition could influence a student's performance in subsequent conditions. For instance, if a student learns better in a quiet environment, their performance might decline in noisier settings not solely due to the noise but because of fatigue or diminished motivation over time. Additionally, practice effects could improve scores in later conditions due to familiarity with the test format, confounding the results. To mitigate these issues, counterbalancing the order of conditions and incorporating rest periods may be necessary, but these strategies increase the complexity of the study design.

Ultimately, the choice between a between-subjects (independent groups) design and a repeated measures design depends on practical considerations and the specific research question. For Mary's study, if she aims to eliminate the risk of carryover effects and isolate the impact of noise level, a between-subjects ANOVA might be preferable. Conversely, if she has logistical constraints and wants to maximize power with fewer participants, a repeated measures design could be advantageous, provided she carefully controls for potential order effects.

References

• Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE Publications.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2016). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Cengage Learning.
• Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Harcourt College Publishers.
• Leary, M. R. (2012). Introduction to Behavioral Research Methods. Pearson Higher Ed.
• Newton, R. R., & Rudestam, K. E. (2014). Your Research Project: A Step-by-Step Guide for the First-Time Researcher. SAGE Publications.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
• McLeod, S. (2019). Types of Experimental Designs. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge.
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs. Houghton Mifflin.
• Loftus, G., & Loftus, E. (2014). Human Memory: The Processing of Information. Routledge.