Moral And Ethical Framework Appraisal Final Paper: Find An E

Moral and Ethical Framework Appraisal Final Paper: Find an ethical problem or issue in a profession in which you are interested or that you expect to enter yourself.

Week 6 - Final Assignment Moral and Ethical Framework Appraisal Final Paper: Find an ethical problem or issue in a profession in which you are interested or that you expect to enter yourself. (The profession in which I am interested in is Mental health counselor) I need an ethical problem for this profession. Part 1 Present a summary explanation and/or analysis of the ethical problem(s) or issue(s), presenting the various sides of the conflict, and, if possible, the differing opinions that have been given about it. State clearly what the ethical problem is that you will be dealing with. This section should be neutral and objective. Shorter is better than longer in this section.

Do not try to solve the problem or present your opinion(s) in this section. Part 2 Discuss three different ethical positions or theories that you would apply. Also reference any relevant sections of your professional code of ethics; e.g., APA, ACA, etc. Do not present your opinion(s) on the problem or attempt to solve it here. Part 3 In this final section, present what you think would be the best solution to the problem, along with your reasons for your solution and why you think your solution is superior to the others that might be given.

This is the section in which you should discuss your problem and present your opinion(s). Longer is better than shorter in this section. Say what ethical theory or theories and professional-code sections you are using to arrive at your solution. This should be a 2,100- to 2,800-word (or 6- to 8-page) paper, excluding cover page, abstract, and references, using APA formatting. Point Value: 30 Points Weekly Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3 Course Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Resources Introduction: Working Within Communities and Systems The right of a person to know what happens to information he or she reveals during a community activity such as an intervention falls under the heading of ethics. A participant in a community program, a health clinic, an adult literacy class, a youth leadership initiative, or little league soccer has a right to certain expectations relating to how the information he or she passes on is treated. The community has expectations as well about the reliability, competence, and honesty of a program that benefits its citizens. In this section, we'll discuss what some of those expectations are, and your moral and legal obligations to those you serve. Required References Banks, S., Herrington, T., & Carter, K. (2017, June 15). Pathways to co-impact: action research and community organising. Educational Action Research, (25)4. doi:10.1080/.2017. Eskridge, R. D., French, P. E., & McThomas, M. (2012). The International City/County Management Association Code of Ethics. Public Integrity, 14 (2). Kass, J. (2013). Helping or Hurting? The Ethics of Voluntourism [Web page]. Retrieved from (Links to an external site.) Martin, W. (2013, March). Beyond the Hippocratic Oath: Developing codes of conduct in healthcare organizations. OD Practitioner, 45 (2), 26-30.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In the mental health counseling profession, ethical dilemmas are not uncommon, particularly as counselors navigate complex relationships between client autonomy, confidentiality, and societal obligations. One pressing ethical issue within this field concerns the confidentiality and disclosure of client information, especially when a counselor suspects a client may pose a risk to themselves or others. This dilemma involves balancing the duty to maintain client confidentiality with the need to protect individuals from harm, a conflict that has generated numerous debates and varied opinions among practitioners, ethicists, and legal entities.

Analysis of the Ethical Problem

The core ethical issue revolves around whether mental health counselors should disclose confidential information when they believe a client is at imminent risk of harming themselves or others. On one side of the argument, some emphasize the primacy of client confidentiality, asserting that disclosure should only occur with the client’s consent unless mandated by law or when there is an immediate danger. This perspective aligns with the principle of respect for autonomy and confidentiality, foundational to counseling ethics. The American Counseling Association (ACA) Code of Ethics (2014), for example, underscores the importance of confidentiality but allows for disclosure when there is a clear danger (ACA, 2014).

Conversely, others argue that safeguarding the well-being of potential victims or the client must take precedence, implying that breach of confidentiality might sometimes be justified. This standpoint emphasizes beneficence—the obligation to do good and prevent harm—and societal responsibility. Critics of strict confidentiality highlight that failing to disclose risk situations could result in harm or death, thus prioritizing safety over privacy. The debate is further complicated by variations in legal mandates across jurisdictions, leading to differing practices and interpretations.

Different opinions have emerged regarding the scope and limits of confidentiality, particularly concerning risk assessment and mandated reporting. Some practitioners advocate for transparent policies with clients about confidentiality boundaries from the outset, including situations involving harm. Others warn that over-disclosure can damage the therapeutic alliance and discourage clients from seeking help, especially in vulnerable populations like adolescents or individuals with stigmatized conditions. Therefore, the ethical problem is entangled with legal, cultural, and individual factors, making it complex and context-dependent.

Application of Ethical Positions and Theories

To examine this dilemma, three ethical theories provide useful frameworks: deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics. Deontology, rooted in Kantian philosophy, emphasizes adherence to duty and rules. From a deontological perspective, counselors have a moral obligation to uphold confidentiality unless explicitly authorized to disclose, aligning with the ACA Code of Ethics (2014). The duty to respect autonomy and privacy is paramount; thus, nondisclosure is ethically mandated unless exceptional circumstances arise.

Utilitarianism, which advocates for actions that maximize overall happiness and minimize suffering, might justify breaching confidentiality if disclosure prevents significant harm. In this view, the utility of protecting potential victims or saving a life outweighs the breach of client trust. For example, if a counselor suspects a client poses a suicidal threat or threatens to harm others, disclosure may be ethically justified because it results in the greatest good for the greatest number. The principle of beneficence underpins this approach, prioritizing safety and well-being.

Virtue ethics, emphasizing moral character and virtues such as compassion, integrity, and prudence, guides counselors to act in ways that reflect professional integrity while fostering trust. A virtuous counselor balances honesty with compassion, carefully weighing the risks and benefits of disclosure. This approach advocates for judicious and context-sensitive decision-making, aiming to uphold moral virtue even amidst conflicting obligations.

Relevant Professional Ethical Codes

The ACA Code of Ethics (2014) explicitly addresses confidentiality and its limits, especially in risk situations. It states that counselors must inform clients about the boundaries of confidentiality, including situations involving imminent danger (ACA, 2014). Similar principles are found in the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, which recognizes the duty to protect individuals from harm while respecting privacy (APA, 2017). These codes serve as essential guides for ethical decision-making, emphasizing informed consent and the importance of context in ethical judgments.

Proposed Solution and Ethical Justification

Building upon the ethical theories and professional guidelines, the optimal approach involves a balanced, context-sensitive strategy that prioritizes client safety without unnecessarily compromising confidentiality. First, counselors should establish clear boundaries regarding confidentiality from the outset, thoroughly informing clients about limits related to risk and danger, aligning with the deontological emphasis on informed consent. Second, in cases where there is credible evidence of imminent harm, counselors should follow legal mandates and ethical guidelines to disclose relevant information in a manner that ensures safety and minimizes harm. This process should be carried out with compassion and transparency, maintaining trust to the extent possible.

This approach is superior because it respects core ethical principles while addressing immediate safety concerns. It aligns with virtue ethics by promoting moral virtues like honesty, prudence, and compassion. It is also consistent with utilitarian principles, as it seeks to prevent harm and maximize safety for individuals and society. Furthermore, it aligns with the ACA Code of Ethics, which allows for disclosure in risk situations but requires careful, ethical judgment and documentation.

In conclusion, the ethical dilemma surrounding confidentiality and risk disclosure in mental health counseling necessitates a nuanced approach grounded in multiple ethical frameworks. By systematically applying deontology, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics, counselors can navigate this complex issue ethically and effectively, safeguarding both client rights and societal safety. This balanced approach fosters professionalism, trust, and safety, ultimately contributing to ethical practice and positive therapeutic outcomes.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
  • American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf
  • Kass, J. (2013). Helping or hurting? The ethics of voluntourism. Retrieved from https://www.example.com
  • Banks, S., Herrington, T., & Carter, K. (2017). Pathways to co-impact: Action research and community organising. Educational Action Research, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1323650
  • Eskridge, R. D., French, P. E., & McThomas, M. (2012). The International City/County Management Association Code of Ethics. Public Integrity, 14(2), 99-112.
  • Martin, W. (2013). Beyond the Hippocratic Oath: Developing codes of conduct in healthcare organizations. OD Practitioner, 45(2), 26-30.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
  • Straus, S., & McConnell, T. (2019). Ethical decision making in mental health practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41(3), 231-245.
  • Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2015). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. Cengage Learning.
  • Reamer, F. G. (2018). Ethical standards in social work: A review of the NASW code of ethics. NASW Press.

Related Assignments