Most Companies And Organizations Have A Written Code Of Cond ✓ Solved

Most Companies And Organizations Have A Written Code Of Conduct For Al

Most companies and organizations have a written code of conduct for all employees. These codes of conduct and codes of ethics establish standards for behavior—what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. These codes may also specify how to report violations and what might happen when an employee violates these codes. Some companies go even further and have a statement of values that is made known to their external customers and the public. Codes of conduct and ethics support six basic values: respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, trustworthiness, and citizenship (Ferrell, O., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L., 2011, p. 224). We often say that ethics and values start at home. This is very true! As students and faculty here at ECPI, we have very defined guidelines and rules for standards of behavior. These codes are found throughout our catalog and range from the student honor code to electronic policy and drug policy. You may have a printed ECPI Catalog, but here is a link to the most current ECPI Catalog: (Links to an external site.) Using the catalog, respond to the following: •Identify one rule or guideline for ethical behavior here at ECPI. •Explain how this rule sets a standard for behavior. •Identify how this rule or guideline addresses (or does not address) current ethical issues found in the workplace. •Ethical codes of conduct should be revisited every year. What change or addition would you make to the codes of conduct found in our catalog?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

In today's increasingly complex business environment, the importance of ethical behavior and adherence to a robust code of conduct cannot be overstated. At ECPI University, the established guidelines serve not only to uphold academic integrity but also to prepare students for ethical challenges in the professional world. One prominent rule within ECPI's code of conduct concerns honesty in academic work and interactions. This guideline mandates that students complete their assignments independently unless collaboration is explicitly authorized, and it prohibits plagiarism and falsification of information. By setting such standards, ECPI emphasizes the value of integrity, accountability, and respect for intellectual property. These principles foster an environment where trust among students and faculty is maintained, which is essential for effective learning and professional development.

This rule directly addresses contemporary ethical issues such as academic dishonesty, which parallels challenges faced in the workplace such as fraud, misrepresentation, and intellectual theft. Upholding honesty prepares students to face ethical dilemmas in their careers, including issues related to transparency, accountability, and ethical decision-making. For instance, in professional settings, falsifying data or engaging in deceptive practices can lead to severe legal and reputational consequences. ECPI’s emphasis on integrity guides students to develop habits that prevent such misconduct, reinforcing the importance of ethical standards in both academic and professional contexts.

In the rapidly evolving business landscape, ethical lapses can have serious repercussions. Therefore, it is crucial that the codes of conduct are regularly reviewed and updated to reflect emerging issues. One suggested addition to ECPI’s code of conduct is the incorporation of specific guidelines on digital ethics, such as responsible use of social media and digital communication. Given the pervasive nature of technology and online presence, students must understand the ethical implications of their digital footprint. For example, inappropriate online posts can damage reputations, violate privacy, or lead to conflicts. Including clear policies on digital conduct would enhance the existing code by addressing current challenges related to cyber ethics.

Furthermore, instilling a comprehensive understanding of cultural sensitivity and respect for diversity could strengthen ECPI's ethical framework. As workplaces become more globalized, ethical issues related to discrimination, harassment, and cultural insensitivity become more prominent. By explicitly addressing these topics within the code of conduct, ECPI can better prepare students to navigate multicultural environments ethically and responsibly. An explicit emphasis on fostering inclusive attitudes and respecting differences would also align with the core values of fairness and citizenship.

To conclude, the integrity rules at ECPI set a standard for honest and responsible behavior that prepares students for real-world ethical challenges. Regular revisits and updates to the code of conduct are vital for ensuring relevance amidst changing societal norms and technological advancements. By enhancing the code with guidelines on digital ethics and cultural sensitivity, ECPI can further promote an environment of ethical awareness and integrity, thereby equipping students to act ethically in all areas of life and work.

References

• Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases. South-Western Cengage Learning.
• ECPI University Catalog. (2024). https://www.ecpi.edu/catalog
• Schwartz, M. S. (2017). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision-Making and Cases. Cengage Learning.
• Laczniak, G. R., & Murphy, P. E. (2006). Moral branding: Aligning brand and moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 265-276.
• Kiessling, T., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Ethical issues in digital marketing: Previous research and future research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(3), 511-527.
• Kaptein, M. (2015). The effectiveness of ethics programs: The role of scope, individual differences, and local factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 415-431.
• Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. J. (1986). Consumer ethical beliefs and shopping values. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 3(2), 43-54.
• Johnson, C. E. (2018). Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership. Sage Publications.
• Valentine, S., & Fleischman, G. (2008). Ethics programs, perceived company effectiveness, and employee attitude: A cross-national field study. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 153-172.
• Kidder, R. M. (2005). How Good People Make Tough Choices. Harvard Business Review Press.