Movies Are Distributed In A Variety Of Forms Not Just

Movies Are Distributed In A Variety Of Forms Not Just

Movies are distributed through multiple channels beyond the traditional first-run theatrical releases. Other common methods include home video sales and rentals (DVDs and Blu-ray discs), streaming services (such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime), pay-per-view and cable television broadcasts, syndication, and international distribution. Each distribution channel offers different price points, allowing companies to target diverse consumer segments based on willingness to pay, convenience, and access. For example, movie tickets at theaters typically command higher prices due to the immersive experience, whereas streaming subscriptions are priced lower to attract a broader base of viewers.

Pricing varies across these channels. The box office often involves dynamic pricing, with peak times costing more. Home video sales are usually a one-time purchase priced between $10-$30, while rentals tend to be around $3-$6. Streaming services typically operate on a subscription basis, ranging from $8 to $15 per month, providing unlimited access. Pay-per-view might charge $5-$20 per movie, depending on the exclusivity. International and digital distribution also involve licensing fees, contributing to varied price points.

In a market where a distributor practices price discrimination but not perfect price discrimination, the firm segments consumers based on their willingness to pay, charging different prices to maximize revenue. Below is a fully labeled graph illustrating this scenario, with the marginal revenue (MR), demand (D), and marginal cost (MC) curves, along with the price discrimination markup.

The graph shows the demand curve sloping downward, the marginal cost curve as horizontal (assuming constant marginal cost), and the marginal revenue curve derived from the demand. The firm sets different prices along the demand curve for distinct consumer segments, capturing consumer surplus and increasing profits.

Game Theory Analysis of Collusive Behavior Between Banks

Consider a one-shot game where PNC Bank and Citizens Bank decide whether to collude on interest rates or defect by keeping rates uncoordinated. The payoff matrix is as follows:

• Both collude: (900, 800)
• PNC colludes, Citizens defects: (1100, 400)
• PNC defects, Citizens colludes: (400, 1100)
• Both defect: (1100, 400)

In this context, PNC’s dominant strategy is to defect because defecting yields a higher payoff regardless of Citizens' decision—either 1100 if Citizens colludes or it defaults to 1100 if Citizens defects, indicating a dominant strategy of defect. Similarly, Citizens' dominant strategy is also to defect because it maximizes its profit in both scenarios. This situation exemplifies the Prisoner’s Dilemma, where both players’ dominant strategies lead to a suboptimal equilibrium—both defecting, resulting in (1100, 400).

When considering an infinitely repeated game, the outcome can change. The possibility of future punishment or reward strategies (such as tit-for-tat or grim trigger) can sustain cooperation, changing the equilibrium. Since players value future profits, they might foster collusion to maintain higher payoffs that would otherwise be unattainable in a single-play game. The Folk Theorem, a key concept in repeated game theory, states that a range of cooperative outcomes become viable as equilibrium if players are sufficiently patient, i.e., value the future enough.

Profit Maximization of a Monopolist

To determine the profit-maximizing output, we find where marginal cost (MC) equals marginal revenue (MR). Given the curves are not provided explicitly, typically this involves identifying the intersection of MR and MC, assuming the MR curve is downward sloping and intersects with MC at a certain quantity. The corresponding price is found on the demand curve at that quantity. The markup over cost is the difference between the price and the marginal cost, usually expressed as a percentage of cost. Monopoly prices tend to be higher than competitive prices due to market power and the markup resulting from the downward-sloping demand curve.

For example, if MR and MC intersect at a quantity of Q, and the demand curve indicates a price P at this quantity, then the monopolist sets output at Q and price at P. The markup over cost is (P* - MC)/MC. This higher price will not fall because monopolists maximize profits where MR = MC; reducing output would decrease total revenue more than the reduction in costs, thus the set price remains stable unless external factors change market conditions.

The Cheese Market and Impact of Tariffs

The US cheese market, when depicted with domestic supply and demand curves, intersects with the world price at a certain equilibrium. The world price is typically below the domestic equilibrium if the US is a net importer, prompting importation to meet excess demand. At this price, the quantity imported is the difference between domestic demand and domestic supply at the world price.

Introducing a tariff on cheese raises the domestic price paid by consumers. This increase diminishes consumer surplus and raises producer surplus temporarily, as domestic producers are incentivized to produce more while consumers buy less. The overall market value decreases because the higher prices and reduced consumption lead to a welfare loss—a deadweight loss. This change is visible on the graph as an upward shift of the domestic price line, resulting in a reduced quantity imported and a higher equilibrium price. The tariff distorts the market equilibrium, favoring domestic producers at the expense of consumers and efficiency.

Thus, government intervention through tariffs leads to higher consumer prices and decreased overall welfare, illustrating the trade-offs inherent in trade policies. The net effect is a transfer of surplus from consumers to domestic producers and government revenues, along with an efficiency loss due to the market distortion.

References

• Krugman, P. R., Melitz, M. J., & Obstfeld, M. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson.
• Perloff, J. M. (2019). Microeconomics (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (9th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
• Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. MIT Press.
• Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (2015). Microeconomics: Principles and Policy. Cengage Learning.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Dixit, A. K., & Londregan, J. (1996). The theory of entry deterrence. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(2), 317-332.
• Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game Theory. MIT Press.
• Nordhaus, W. (2002). The Economics of Climate Change. Yale University Press.
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.