Mrs. Smith Was A 73-Year-Old Widow Who Lived Alone 506378

Mrs Smith Was A 73 Year Old Widow Who Lived Alone With No Significant

Mrs. Smith was a 73-year-old widow who lived alone with no significant social support. She had been suffering from emphysema for several years and had frequent hospitalizations for respiratory problems. On her last admission, her pneumonia rapidly progressed to organ failure, and she appeared to be near death. She was alone in her hospital room, experiencing fluctuating consciousness. The medical-surgical nursing staff and the nurse manager prioritized making her end-of-life period as comfortable as possible, opting against transferring her to the palliative care unit despite possible cost considerations, because of her signs of imminent death and the need for compassionate care. The nursing staff drew on the concept of human caring as the "language of nursing practice," aiming to provide authentic presence and comfort during her final hours.

The nurse manager reorganized patient assignments to ensure continuous, compassionate care. A clinical nurse leader (CNL), working across both medical and surgical units, was tasked with providing direct nursing care and coordination. The CNL and a volunteer nurse attended to Mrs. Smith, providing personal care, turning and bathing her, and suctioning to ease her breathing. The CNL inquired about any close friends who might be present, discovering a friend who could say her final goodbye. The team created a peaceful environment by speaking softly, praying, and singing hymns, reflecting deep compassion and caring for Mrs. Smith. Her death was witnessed by caring persons, offering comfort to the staff and reinforcing the importance of compassionate presence at end-of-life.

Caring in nursing is acknowledged as a complex art rooted in authentic, spiritual, and ethical relationships. Davidson, Ray, and Turkel (2011) emphasize that caring creates an aesthetic experience that illuminates the nurse-patient bond, allowing for authentic ethical choices that promote healing, health, well-being, and peaceful death. The teams' actions fostered a healing environment that impacted not only Mrs. Smith but also the emotional milieu of the unit, supporting the well-being of other patients and staff alike. The caring actions demonstrated the profound moral and spiritual dimensions of nursing practice, underpinning the importance of human connection during terminal care.

The hospital’s bureaucratic healthcare system — characterized by its hierarchy, policies, and management structures — played a crucial role in this scenario. Leadership through the nurse manager, the clinical nurse leader, and the vice president for nursing shaped the delivery of compassionate care. These leadership roles convey authority, responsibility, and ethical values that influence practice behaviors and prioritization. The care provided reflected underlying values about respecting the dignity of patients and fostering a caring community amidst a formal institutional framework. The staff’s decisions exemplify how a bureaucratic structure can support a caring model that integrates questions of ethics, spirituality, social-cultural sensitivity, and economic considerations at end-of-life.

Regarding end-of-life issues within the context of the theory of bureaucratic caring, essential considerations include respecting patient autonomy, ensuring dignity, and providing holistic comfort. Ethical dilemmas such as balancing resource allocation with individual needs, cultural sensitivity in spiritual rituals, and legal obligations regarding advanced directives and consent are integral. The nurses’ focus on maintaining Mrs. Smith’s comfort and spiritual needs illustrates how caring practices transcend purely physical interventions, emphasizing a holistic approach rooted in human dignity. These concerns are addressed by the leadership’s support, policies that promote compassionate care, and the staff’s moral commitment to honoring the patient’s final wishes.

The nurse manager’s decisions balanced these various issues by emphasizing patient-centered care rooted in compassion and dignity. She recognized the importance of emotional and spiritual expression, considering Mrs. Smith’s preferences and the presence of her friend. By reorganizing staff roles and enabling the clinical nurse leader to coordinate direct care, the manager facilitated a caring environment that honored ethical and spiritual values while maintaining organizational procedures. The decision-making process incorporated considerations of emotional comfort, spiritual needs, and the logistical reality of hospital resources, demonstrating a nuanced approach rooted in ethical sensitivity and leadership wisdom.

The role of the clinical nurse leader (CNL) in this context is vital for implementing caring practice within complex hospital environments. The CNL is positioned to coordinate care, advocate for patient needs, and lead the development of a caring culture. While the nurse manager typically oversees operational and administrative functions, the CNL bridges the clinical and leadership domains, operationalizing caring principles proactively and directly at the bedside. This distinction reflects their complementary roles in fostering a holistic, patient-centered approach. Integrating the CNL into the theory of bureaucratic caring involves emphasizing their role in advocating for compassionate, personalized care within the organizational structure, ensuring that caring is embedded in daily practice amidst bureaucratic constraints.

Various interrelationships are evident among those involved. The vice president for nursing provided strategic support and upheld organizational values emphasizing compassionate care. The nurse manager orchestrated the operational aspect and fostered the caring environment through leadership decisions. The clinical nurse leader facilitated direct, hands-on caring for Mrs. Smith, bridging organizational policies with person-centered practice. The staff nurses supported these efforts through their dedicated care, and Mrs. Smith’s friend played a pivotal role in ensuring her final moments were filled with human connection and spiritual comfort. This interconnected web of relationships underscores the collaborative team effort rooted in shared values and ethical commitments to profound caring at the end of life.

Compared to the traditional nursing process — which involves assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and evaluation — Turkel, Ray, and Kornblatt’s (2012) language of caring emphasizes an ontological and expressive framework centered on authentic human engagement. Their model prioritizes presence, compassion, and ethical action as integral to nursing. In contrast to the linear and task-oriented traditional process, the caring language fosters relational understanding and moral integrity. It encourages nurses to move beyond technical interventions to embrace a holistic, spiritual, and authentic connection that facilitates healing, peace, and dignity. This approach aligns closely with the principles of the theory of bureaucratic caring by integrating organizational structure with moral-practical engagement, ensuring that caring is both a moral stance and a practical action within complex healthcare environments.

Paper For Above instruction

The case of Mrs. Smith exemplifies the profound impact of caring behaviors in terminal care within a bureaucratic healthcare setting. The decision of the nurse manager to assign the clinical nurse leader (CNL) to provide direct, personalized care was driven by a recognition of the importance of authentic human connection at the end of life. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2004), the CNL role encompasses leadership in care coordination, advocating for patient-centered practices, and fostering a healing environment. The CNL operates as a clinical leader who ensures that care delivery aligns with holistic, compassionate principles, emphasizing the art of caring, ethical decision-making, and fostering meaningful relationships with patients and families.

In the context of Mrs. Smith’s end-of-life care, several issues influence decision-making within the framework of bureaucratic caring. Ethical concerns revolve around respecting Mrs. Smith’s dignity, autonomy, and wishes; spiritual considerations involve providing a peaceful environment conducive to spiritual reflection; legal factors include compliance with advanced directives and informed consent; social-cultural sensitivities acknowledge her cultural background and possible spiritual rituals; economic factors influence resource allocation, and physical issues pertain to comfort and symptom management. These interconnected issues necessitate a nuanced approach, balancing organizational policies with the moral obligation to provide humane, individualized care.

The nurse manager’s balancing act involved prioritizing Mrs. Smith’s comfort, respecting her spiritual needs, and facilitating a peaceful death while adhering to hospital policies. The manager’s leadership facilitated a shift in staffing roles, enabling the CNL to coordinate direct care, thus fostering a caring practice rooted in compassion. This approach exemplifies how leadership can uphold ethical and caring standards amidst bureaucratic constraints, with the goal of ensuring that patients die with dignity and surrounded by compassion.

The role of the clinical nurse leader is distinct yet complementary to that of the nurse manager. While the nurse manager oversees operational and administrative aspects of the unit, the CNL engages directly with patients, advocating for their holistic needs and leading care practices that embody caring and ethical principles. The CNL’s emphasis on relational care and ethical advocacy aligns with the caring science perspective articulated by Davidson, Ray, and Turkel (2011), where authentic presence and moral integrity are central to healing. Embedding the CNL into the bureaucratic caring framework ensures that organizational structures support caregivers’ moral commitments and promote compassionate care as an integral part of clinical practice.

Interpersonal relationships among the varied stakeholders—vice president for nursing, nurse manager, CNL, staff nurses, Mrs. Smith, and her friend—are crucial for delivering compassionate end-of-life care. The organizational hierarchy supports mutual respect and shared values, fostering a team approach grounded in empathy and moral responsibility. The CNL acts as a bridge between organizational policies and patient-centered care, facilitating effective communication and ethical practice. Mrs. Smith’s friend’s participation reflects the importance of human connection beyond healthcare professionals, emphasizing the spiritual and emotional dimensions of caring.

In comparing traditional nursing processes with Turkel, Ray, and Kornblatt’s (2012) language of caring, the latter emphasizes relational authenticity, moral presence, and compassionate engagement over transactional tasks. This approach aligns with the principles of the theory of bureaucratic caring by integrating organizational structure with the moral and emotional aspects of care. It underscores that caring is not merely a set of actions but a moral attitude that influences clinical decisions and interactions, ultimately fostering a healing environment that honors the full personhood of patients like Mrs. Smith.

References

• American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2004). Position Statement: The Clinical Nurse Leader. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20(6), 335-336.
• Davidson, P., Ray, M., & Turkel, M. (2011). Caring the art of nursing practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
• Turkel, M. C., Ray, M. A., & Kornblatt, T. (2012). The language of caring: A model for holistic nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 25(2), 136-142.
• Sherman, R. O. (2012). The clinical nurse leader: Changing the landscape of healthcare. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(7-8), 355-358.
• Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. Jossey-Bass.
• McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2014). Critical thinking, clinical judgment, and clinical reasoning. Elsevier.
• Institute of Medicine. (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. The National Academies Press.
• Hoffert, M. I., & Johnson, K. (2016). Ethical considerations in end-of-life care: Nursing perspectives. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 18(4), 329-334.
• Alligood, M. R. (2014). Cultural care nursing: Diversity and universality. Elsevier.
• Watson, J. (2008). Nursing: The philosophy and science of caring (Revised edition). University Press of Colorado.