Must Be 400 Words With 4 Citations APA Format The Juvenile J

Must Be 400 Words With 4 Citataions Apa Formatthe Juvenile Justice Sys

The juvenile justice system faces numerous challenges in addressing the complex needs of a diverse juvenile population. Traditionally, it has aimed to differentiate juvenile offenders from adults, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment (Snyder & Sickmund, 2019). However, recent trends suggest a movement toward 'adultification' of juvenile offenders, driven by concerns over serious crimes and public safety. This shift complicates efforts to tailor interventions appropriately, as it may overlook developmental differences and fail to consider the unique circumstances of youth (Scott & Steinberg, 2020).

One significant challenge is the increasing prevalence of juvenile involvement in gangs, substance abuse, and cyber-related crimes such as cyberbullying and cyber-stalking (Finkelhor et al., 2020). These issues require specialized responses that account for mental health, family dynamics, and social influences. However, the criminal justice system's tendency to treat offenders as adults often results in harsher punishments, which may exacerbate underlying issues rather than address root causes (Miller, 2018). This approach risks stigmatizing youth, reducing their chances for successful rehabilitation.

Furthermore, the legal framework has struggled to keep pace with technological advances and social developments, such as sexual-oriented texting and school violence. These phenomena pose new challenges, demanding updated policies and resources to manage juvenile offenders effectively (Barbaree & Marshall, 2021). The adultification trend often disregards developmental differences, such as impulse control and emotional regulation, which are vital in designing age-appropriate interventions (Steinberg & Scott, 2020).

From a Judeo-Christian perspective, the treatment of juvenile offenders as adults raises ethical and moral concerns. Many Judeo-Christian teachings emphasize compassion, forgiveness, and the potential for redemption, suggesting that youth should be given opportunities for rehabilitation rather than harsh punishment (McNeill, 2020). Such viewpoints advocate for a justice system that recognizes the intrinsic worth and potential for growth in every individual, aligning with the principles of restorative justice (Stuart et al., 2021). Thus, integrating these values into juvenile justice policies could promote more humane and effective responses to youth crime, emphasizing healing over retribution.

Paper For Above instruction

The juvenile justice system is tasked with managing a variety of youth offenders, including delinquent, undisciplined, dependent, neglected, abused, and status offenders. As societal issues evolve, so too does the nature of juvenile offending, with increased involvement in gangs, substance abuse, cybercrimes, and school violence (Snyder & Sickmund, 2019). This diversification demands flexible and thoughtful responses from the system, which is increasingly pressured to 'adultify' juvenile offenders due to public safety concerns (Scott & Steinberg, 2020). Such adultification typically involves treating juvenile offenders as adults, often leading to harsher sanctions and reduced consideration of developmental factors.

The challenge lies in balancing public safety with the developmental needs of youth. Many juveniles involved in serious crimes are influenced by environmental and social factors that differ significantly from adult offenders. Treating them as adults may neglect these factors and overlook their potential for rehabilitation. For example, adolescents have still maturing brains, particularly in areas related to impulse control and decision-making, which suggests they can change given appropriate interventions (Miller, 2018). Overly punitive measures risk entrenching criminal behavior and increasing recidivism, especially when mental health issues or family problems are present (Finkelhor et al., 2020).

The integration of technology has further complicated juvenile justice, as cybercrimes like cyberbullying and sexting require nuanced responses that respect juveniles’ rights and developmental stages. Traditional justice models may not be suitable for these new challenges, highlighting a need for specialized programs and policies (Barbaree & Marshall, 2021). The adultification trend is problematic, as it often disregards the developmental and psychological differences between juveniles and adults, leading to unfair treatment and less effective outcomes (Steinberg & Scott, 2020).

From a moral standpoint rooted in Judeo-Christian principles, treating juvenile offenders as adults conflicts with teachings of compassion, forgiveness, and redemption. These religious values advocate for a justice approach that emphasizes rehabilitation and personal growth, recognizing the potential for change in every individual (McNeill, 2020). Restorative justice models inspired by these principles focus on healing the community and the offender, fostering a more humane approach to juvenile offending (Stuart et al., 2021). Incorporating these values could help reform the juvenile justice system into one that prioritizes moral development and societal reintegration over punishment alone.

References

• Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2021). The juvenile justice system: Responding to adolescent sexual offending. Springer.
• Finkelhor, D., Shattuck, M., Turner, H., & Hamby, S. (2020). Violence, abuse, and cyberbullying: The relevance of new harms for juvenile justice. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 37(2), 131-143.
• Miller, J. (2018). The adolescent brain and juvenile justice: Implications for policy. Youth & Society, 50(6), 674-701.
• McNeill, T. (2020). Theology and justice: The moral foundations of restorative justice. Journal of Religious Ethics, 48(3), 483-507.
• Snyder, H. N., & Sickmund, M. (2019). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2019 national report. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
• Stuart, H., et al. (2021). Restorative justice and juvenile offenders: Perspectives and practices from religious traditions. Faith & Justice Journal, 15(2), 122-138.
• Scott, E., & Steinberg, L. (2020). Rethinking juvenile justice: The developmental perspective. American Psychologist, 75(7), 887-899.