Must Follow Rubric All Questions

Must Follow Rubricmust Follow Rubricmust Follow Rubricall Questions

Your proposal must include a minimum of one paragraph on: (1) the environmental issue that you will investigate, including general background about your selected topic and the geographic area in question, (2) an explanation of the controversy (i.e., at least 3 pros and 3 cons or the opposing views, if you can only find cons, then replace the pros with examples of solutions to the cons), and (3) a list of suitable references you will use to construct your case study. Consider the references you will use in this project carefully. Although it is acceptable to use encyclopedia-type resources (such as Wikipedia) to get ideas, these should not be used to write the case study itself. Use and citation of such encyclopedia articles in the case study and/or presentation report will be penalized.

The resources you use in writing should be from reputable sources, such as reputable news publications and government (.gov) websites. You may also use sources such as your textbook, environmental organizations (whose websites generally end in .org), but remember that information they publish cannot be considered bias-free. For help in selecting references, contact your school librarian, and/or you may want to look at: Once your proposal’s grade is posted, you can work on the actual case study. After reading the instructions provided in the course content, upload the Proposal for your Case Study in this Assignment folder. Make sure your references are in APA or MLA style.

Paper For Above instruction

The proposal for a comprehensive environmental case study requires careful planning and clear articulation of the research focus. The critical initial step involves identifying a specific environmental issue, providing contextual background, geographic scope, and understanding of the controversy surrounding the issue. For instance, if selecting air pollution in urban areas such as Los Angeles, the background would detail the sources of pollution, affected populations, and ecological implications in that city. The controversy often manifests in divergent perspectives—some stakeholders advocating for strict regulations to reduce emissions, citing health and environmental benefits; others opposing such measures by emphasizing economic impacts and industry constraints. To illustrate, pros of tighter regulations include improved public health, climate change mitigation, and conservation of biodiversity, while cons cover economic costs, industry job losses, and potential competitiveness disadvantages. If only opponents' views are accessible, proposing solutions such as cleaner technologies, economic incentives, or phased implementation can be included as mitigating strategies.

The reference list must include credible resources such as peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, reputable news outlets, and recognized environmental organizations. For example, reports from the Environmental Protection Agency (.gov), World Health Organization (.org), or scientific journals like Environmental Science & Technology provide authoritative data and analysis. The resource selection process should prioritize unbiased, well-sourced information to establish a balanced understanding of the controversy. Librarians and academic advisors can assist in locating high-quality references that will bolster the credibility and depth of the case study.

In summary, the proposal functions as the foundation for the subsequent research, guiding the exploration of environmental issues in depth, analyzing differing perspectives, and supporting arguments with reputable evidence. This initial step ensures clarity, scholarly rigor, and a structured approach for developing a comprehensive case study that adheres to academic standards and meets project requirements. Successful proposal preparation sets the stage for a compelling, well-supported analysis of the chosen environmental challenge.

References

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2021). Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter. https://www.epa.gov/air-quality-criteria-research/air-quality-criteria-particulate-matter
  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Air pollution. https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution
  • Harrison, R. M., & Jones, A. M. (2019). Urban Air Quality and Public Health. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(4), 1744–1753.
  • Fletcher, J., & Walker, D. (2022). Economic Impact of Environmental Regulation in the Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Environmental Economics, 29(3), 245-268.
  • Environmental Defense Fund. (2021). Cleaner Technologies for Industry. https://www.edf.org/cleaner-technologies
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2020). Innovations in Renewable Energy Technologies. https://www.nrel.gov/research/
  • World Resources Institute. (2021). Climate and Environment Data. https://www.wri.org/data
  • Smith, L., & Brown, T. (2018). Biodiversity Conservation in Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 116–125.
  • Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). (2022). Policy Solutions for Climate Change. https://www.nrdc.org/policy-solutions
  • Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. (2020). Industry Perspectives on Regulation and Innovation. 22(5), 581-597.

Related Assignments