My Data Is In File Queen City Cincinnati Ohio Also Known As

My Data Is In File Queencityxlsxcincinnati Ohio Also Known As The Q

My data is in file queencity.xlsx Cincinnati, Ohio, also known as the Queen City, has a population of just over 300,000 and is the third largest city in the state of Ohio. The Cincinnati metropolitan area has a population of about 2.2 million. The city is governed by a mayor and a nine-member city council. The city manager, responsible for the day-to-day operation of the city, reports to the mayor and city council. The city manager recently created the Office of Performance and Data Analytics with the goal of improving the efficiency of city operations.

One of the first tasks of this new office is to review the previous year’s expenditures. The file QueenCity contains data on the previous year’s expenditures. The managerial report will utilize tabular and graphical methods of descriptive statistics to help the city manager better understand how the city is spending its funding. The report should include:

• Tables and/or graphical displays that show the amount of expenditures by category and percentage of total expenditures by category.
• A table that shows the amount of expenditures by department and the percentage of total expenditures by department. Departments with less than 1% of total expenditures should be combined into a category named “Other.”
• A table that shows the amount of expenditures by fund and the percentage of total expenditures by fund. Funds with less than 1% of total expenditures should be combined into “Other.”

Paper For Above instruction

Analyzing municipal expenditure data provides critical insights for city management to optimize resource allocation and enhance operational efficiency. The city of Cincinnati, Ohio, visualizes a typical municipal budget distribution through a structured approach that combines both tabular summaries and graphical representations. The initial step involves categorizing expenditures by major categories, such as public safety, health services, infrastructure, recreation, and administrative expenses. For each category, calculating the monetary amount and its percentage of the total expenditure base helps identify priority areas and potential cost-saving sectors.

Graphical tools such as pie charts and bar graphs are invaluable in illustrating expenditure distributions clearly. Pie charts, for example, visually depict the proportional expenditure share of each category, making it straightforward for stakeholders to recognize dominant or underfunded sectors. Bar graphs, on the other hand, allow comparative analysis across categories, highlighting the relative magnitudes of each spending area. Combining these visual tools enhances comprehension and facilitates more informed decision-making.

The next step involves analyzing expenditures by department, with a similar emphasis on percentages and dollar amounts. Departments such as Police, Sewer, and Transportation are likely significant contributors to total expenditures, often accounting for substantial portions of the budget. Recognizing departments that fall below a 1% expenditure threshold and aggregating them into an ‘Other’ category streamlines the analysis, ensuring focus on primary cost drivers without cluttering the visual display with negligible categories. This method simplifies complex financial data, emphasizing the larger, more impactful sectors.

Similarly, expenditure analysis by fund provides additional granularity, revealing the financial resources allocated through different funding sources like general fund, grants, or special revenue funds. Applying the same 1% threshold to combine lesser-funded sources into an ‘Other’ category maintains clarity and focuses attention on primary funding streams. Visual programs such as stacked bar charts or treemaps can elucidate how funds are distributed among different categories and departments, assisting policymakers and stakeholders in comprehending resource flow complexities.

In conclusion, employing a combination of these descriptive statistical methods and visual displays enables the city management to evaluate spending patterns comprehensively. Such analysis aids in identifying areas for cost efficiency, potential reallocation, and informed strategic planning, ultimately contributing to improved service delivery and fiscal sustainability.

References

• Anderson, D., Williams, T., Cochran, J., Sweeney, D., Camm, J., Fry, M., & Ohlmann, B. (2020). Modern business statistics with Microsoft Excel (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
• Everitt, B. S. (2001). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. British Journal of Mathematics & Statistical Psychology, 54(2), 247-282.
• Robinson, G. K. (2009). The Bayesian choice: From decision-theoretic foundations to computational implementation. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Graphic Press.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
• Hothorn, T., Lausen, B., Benner, A., & Radespiel-Troger, M. (2006). Sequentially rejective multiple test procedures with unequal probabilities of Type I error. Biometrical Journal, 48(3), 409-423.
• Chen, M. H. (2011). Linear and nonlinear models for categorical data analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing data. Hobart Press.