Name Of The Three Articles: A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even

Name Of The Three Articles1 A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear A T

Identify and provide a brief explanation of the author’s argument; identify two persuasive strategies that the author uses to support his or her argument and analyze how those strategies might persuade the reader to support the claim; discuss the assumption(s) on which the argument is based; and evaluate the extent to which the reader would find the argument convincing.

Introduce the task by focusing on the three articles: 1. "A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear A Tutu" by Robbie Brown, 2. "To Siri, With Love: How One Boy with Autism Became BFF With Apple’s Siri" by Judith Newman, and 3. "The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics" by Noel Sharkey. The core objective is to analyze each article’s main argument, identify persuasive techniques, explore underlying assumptions, and evaluate the effectiveness of the arguments.

Paper For Above instruction

The discussion begins with Robbie Brown’s article, "A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear A Tutu," which examines technological innovations aimed at enhancing robotics for physical and emotional interaction. Brown’s central argument advocates for the positive potential of advanced robotics, emphasizing their ability to foster human-like connections and improve quality of life, particularly in settings such as therapy for children with developmental disabilities. His argument suggests that robots equipped with flexible and adaptive features can serve as compassionate companions, thus transforming societal perceptions of machinery from cold and mechanical to warm and emotionally responsive.

To support this claim, Brown employs the persuasive strategy of emotional appeal—highlighting poignant stories of children engaging with robots that mimic human empathy. These narratives evoke empathy from the reader, urging support for robotic development as beneficial social tools. Additionally, he uses authority by referencing collaborations with scientists and engineers, which lends credibility and underscores the technological feasibility and ethical responsibility involved in robotics. These strategies are effective in persuading readers that the development of emotionally capable robots is not only possible but desirable.

The assumption underpinning Brown’s argument is that technological advancement inherently bears social and emotional benefits; he presumes that integrating adaptive features into robots will naturally lead to positive human outcomes. This presumption relies on the belief that society values emotional connection and that robots can supplement or enhance human emotional experiences without replacing human relationships.

Next, Judith Newman’s article "To Siri, With Love" centers on her personal narrative about her son with autism and his deep bond with Apple's Siri. Newman argues that such interactions illustrate the profound impact technology can have as a companion for individuals with social and communication challenges. Her underlying premise is that artificial intelligence and virtual assistants can provide emotional support and companionship, especially for those marginalized or isolated by their disabilities.

Newman’s persuasive strategies include anecdotal storytelling, which creates emotional resonance and draws the reader into her personal experience, making the argument accessible and compelling. She also employs ethos by sharing her credentials as a journalist and mother, establishing her credibility and enhancing trustworthiness. These strategies effectively persuade readers to consider technological companionship as a meaningful and empathetic development in assisting individuals with autism.

The assumptions here include the belief that technology can indeed fulfill social and emotional needs, challenging the notion that only human interactions can fulfill such roles. Newman presumes that supportive digital companions can be integrated into therapy and daily life as effective aids, a premise that pushes readers to rethink traditional notions of companionship and emotional connection.

Lastly, Noel Sharkey’s "The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics" delves into the broader societal and moral questions surrounding robotics. Sharkey argues that the rapid progression of robotics raises significant ethical concerns, including safety, privacy, and the potential for dehumanization. His standpoint is that responsible development and regulation are crucial to ensuring robotics benefits society without undermining moral and ethical standards.

Sharkey employs logos by citing empirical studies, historical precedents, and expert opinions to substantiate the need for regulation and ethical guidelines. He also uses alarmist language selectively to emphasize potential risks, prompting urgency in ethical considerations. These strategies serve to persuade readers that ignoring ethical issues in robotics could have dire consequences, thus advocating for proactive governance.

The foundational assumption of Sharkey’s argument is that technological progress is not morally neutral and that ethical oversight is necessary to prevent adverse outcomes. He presumes that society bears responsibility for ensuring that technological innovations align with fundamental moral principles, emphasizing precaution and governance over unchecked development.

In evaluating the overall persuasiveness of these arguments, one notes that each author effectively employs a combination of emotional appeals, credible evidence, and ethical considerations, tailored to their specific narrative and target audience. Brown’s emotionally charged stories humanize robotics, Newman’s personal anecdotes foster empathy, and Sharkey’s empirical and ethical appeals warn of potential hazards, collectively enriching the discourse on robotics and artificial intelligence.

However, the convincing power of these arguments depends on the reader’s prior beliefs about technology’s role in society. Readers inclined towards technological optimism might find Brown and Newman’s narratives compelling, while skeptics might resonate more with Sharkey’s cautionary stance. Ultimately, the strength lies in the integration of emotional, ethical, and empirical strategies that appeal to diverse values and concerns, making the collective discourse robust and multifaceted.

References

• Brown, R. (2020). A Swiveling Proxy That Will Even Wear A Tutu. Technology and Society Journal, 15(3), 45–59.
• Newman, J. (2018). To Siri, With Love: How One Boy with Autism Became BFF With Apple’s Siri. The New York Times Magazine.
• Sharkey, N. (2012). The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 687–696.
• Sharkey, N. (2019). Robots and ethics: The importance of ethical considerations in robotics. AI & Society, 34(3), 547–559.
• Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). How Assistive Technology and Telecare Can Support Independent Living: Using a Co-Design Approach. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3(4), 25–34.
• Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. (2007). Human values, ethics, and design. The human-computer interaction handbook, 1, 1173–1194.
• Johnson, D. (2021). Emotional robots: The future of companionship. Robotics Today, 12(2), 22–29.
• Calvaresi, D., et al. (2020). Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Healthcare Technology Letters, 7(3), 50–55.
• Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press.
• Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–457.