Namenurs 6053 Module 04 Week 07 Discussion Rubric

Namenurs 6053 Module04 Week07 Discussion Rubricgrid Viewlist Viewex

Namenurs 6053 Module04 Week07 Discussion Rubricgrid Viewlist Viewex

Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week07_Discussion_Rubric · Grid View · List View

Evaluate and analyze the discussion rubric criteria, including main posting quality, timeliness, responses, participation, and weekly discussion expectations. Focus on the level of critical analysis, synthesis of knowledge, clarity, professionalism, APA adherence, and engagement over the week.

Paper For Above instruction

The assignment involves analyzing the provided rubric and example discussion criteria for a nursing course module. The goal is to critically assess how students are expected to engage with the discussion prompts, demonstrating depth of understanding, critical thinking skills, timely participation, and professional communication. The rubric emphasizes the importance of reflection supported by credible sources, adherence to APA style, and active participation across multiple days.

The criteria specify that high-quality main posts should comprehensively answer all parts of the discussion, incorporating reflection, synthesis, and current credible sources—at least three for exemplary work. Writing must be clear, concise, free of grammatical errors, and follow APA guidelines fully. Slightly lower performance levels show decreasing depth, fewer sources, and some writing errors. Failing to meet these expectations results in inadequate responses that lack depth, citation, and professionalism.

In addition, the rubric assesses the timeliness of posts, with early submission (by day 3) earning full points. Response posts to classmates and faculty should demonstrate critical thinking, application to practice, professionalism, appropriate supporting sources, and clear, respectful communication. The percentage of responses showing synthesis and understanding correlates with the quality points assigned.

The participation criterion underscores the importance of consistent engagement by posting on at least three different days during the week, fostering ongoing dialogue and collaboration.

This rubric framework guides students to develop comprehensive, well-supported, and timely discussion contributions—crucial for their success in the course's collaborative learning environment.

Elevator Pitch for CovClinic App for HCA Healthcare

HCA Healthcare is a profit-generating healthcare organization headquartered in Tennessee, United States. The proposed CovClinic application aims to enhance the company's healthcare services, especially amid ongoing pandemic challenges, by leveraging remote healthcare technologies to improve efficiency and patient access. The app will allow patients to access medical information, consult healthcare providers remotely, and receive referrals for critical symptoms, thus reducing hospital overcrowding and minimizing the risk of infection transmission.

The application's role aligns with HCA's commitment to quality care and improving human life. It facilitates easier access to healthcare services, especially for individuals residing far from facilities or hesitant to visit hospitals due to infection fears. Patients will create accounts, access relevant medical publications, and connect with physicians for virtual consultations. Physicians will evaluate patient symptoms remotely and advise provisions for urgent care where necessary.

This innovative solution fits the organizational mission to improve healthcare quality and foster healthier communities. It also complements existing services and provides continuous, post-pandemic access to medical information and support, thereby reinforcing HCA's dedication to patient-centered care (Englebright & Executive, 2018).

References

  • Englebright, J., & Executive, C. N. (2018). Evidence-based clinical documentation: HCA healthcare. National Academy of Medicine.
  • Safonov, Y. M., & Borshch, V. I. (2019). Strategic model of managing healthcare facilities.
  • Clarke, C. (2019). Strategic planning in healthcare. In Textbook of Medical Administration and Leadership (pp. 31-46). Springer.
  • Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). Springer.
  • Clark, C. M., et al. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330.
  • Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE
  • Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23.
  • Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542.
  • Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing. Springer.
  • Additional credible sources relevant to healthcare technology and organizational behavior.

Related Assignments