Narrative Or Informational Text Strategy Your Name Arkansas

Narrative or Informational Text Strategy Your Name Arkansas State University

Gather background information to build the student's profile by interviewing the parent and student. Next, develop a comprehension strategy that can help the targeted student who could benefit from instruction. Select either a Narrative or Informational text comprehension strategy. Use the Backward Design Lesson Plan to implement your strategy, perform the instruction with your student, and then write a two-page reflection on the implementation and its effects on student learning.

Paper For Above instruction

The assessment and enhancement of reading comprehension, especially for students classified as exceptional learners, demand a multifaceted understanding of individual profiles and tailored instructional strategies. This paper explores the systematic process of developing and implementing an effective narrative or informational text comprehension strategy, emphasizing personalized assessment, strategic planning, execution, and reflection.

Beginning with the collection of comprehensive background information through interviews with both parents and students, educators can develop a detailed profile that informs instructional decisions. These interviews should elucidate the student’s reading experiences, interests, challenges, and environmental factors that influence learning. For example, understanding a student's attitude towards reading, familial reading habits, or access to technology can shape the choice of strategy and content focus.

Once background data is collated, the next step involves selecting an effective comprehension strategy rooted in research-based practices. For narrative texts, strategies like making predictions, constructing mental images, or understanding story structure are powerful tools. For informational texts, techniques such as text coding, main-idea analysis, or question-answer relationships are often suitable. The selection must align with identified student needs—for instance, choosing mental imagery for a student who struggles with visualizing story elements or content mapping for a student overwhelmed by informational content.

The Backward Design Lesson Plan serves as a scaffold for implementing the chosen strategy. It begins with identifying clear learning outcomes directly tied to developmental and educational standards, considering the student's unique needs. Assessment evidence must be specified—what does mastery look like? Rubrics, checklists, or performance criteria delineate expectations, such as correctly answering comprehension questions or successfully identifying main ideas.

In planning the lesson activities, the focus lies in crafting sequential, action-oriented steps that guide the student through the strategy. For example, if using story structure comprehension, activities may include discussing key elements of a story, guided visualization exercises, and collaborative story mapping. Differentiation strategies are critical—these include providing visuals, adjusting complexity, offering additional supports, or integrating technology—ensuring accessibility and engagement for diverse learners.

Implementation of the strategy involves direct interaction with the student, monitoring engagement, and making real-time adjustments as needed. During this phase, noting the student’s response, participation, and comprehension is essential. The practical application enables educators to observe how the strategy influences understanding and engagement, and whether it realigns student confidence and interest toward reading tasks.

Post-instruction, a comprehensive reflection evaluates the process's effectiveness. This reflection considers whether the student demonstrated understanding, the impact on their reading skills, and observations of engagement or difficulty. For example, did the student successfully identify main ideas? Did visualizations enhance their comprehension? The reflection also discusses potential modifications for future lessons, such as incorporating more visuals for visual learners or breaking tasks into smaller steps for students needing additional support.

Furthermore, this reflective exercise deepens understanding of how targeted strategies influence reading development, particularly among exceptional learners. It reinforces the importance of personalized instruction, ongoing assessment, and flexibility in teaching approaches. Lessons learned can inform future practices, emphasizing the need for continuous adaptation aligned with student progress and feedback.

Ultimately, this process underscores that effective reading comprehension instruction for exceptional students requires a balance of thorough assessment, strategic planning, hands-on implementation, and reflective analysis. Such an approach fosters meaningful engagement, supports skill development, and promotes confidence in reading, laying a foundation for lifelong literacy.

References

• Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2010). Teaching students with dyslexia and reading difficulties: A review of evidence-based practices. Topics in Language Disorders, 30(4), 338–355.
• Craft, M. (2003). Strategies that promote comprehension: An overview. Reading Rockets. Retrieved from https://www.readingrockets.org
• Gambrell, L. B., Morrow, L. M., & Pressley, M. (2011). Best practices in literacy instruction. Guilford Publications.
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the National Reading Panel, NIH Publication No. 00-4769.
• Okma, B. (2017). Differentiated instruction strategies for diverse learners. The Journal of Special Education, 51(2), 75–85.
• Ruddell, R. B., & Unrau, N. J. (2004). Teaching reading comprehension processes. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 786–795.
• Snow, C. E., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2003). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. National Academies Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Wilkinson, I. A., & Webb, N. (2010). Differentiated instruction: A research-based approach. Educational Leadership, 68(6), 52–57.