National Infrastructure Protection And Cybersecurity Challen
National Infrastructure Protection and Cybersecurity Challenges
In this compilation of scholarly articles, the focus centers on the pivotal role of technology and strategic measures in safeguarding national infrastructure against evolving threats. The articles examine the importance of cybersecurity, interdependence of critical systems, and the collaborative efforts between public and private sectors to enhance national security.
The first article by Karabacak, Yildirim, and Baykal (2016) emphasizes the integration of technology in protecting critical infrastructure. It highlights the challenges related to confidentiality, responsibility, and the need for strategic goal setting within administrative frameworks. The authors stress that technological advancements can both enhance security and pose vulnerabilities, particularly in protecting sensitive commercial and governmental information.
Baggett and Simpkins (2018) explore homeland security strategies, pointing out the significant reliance on private ownership of infrastructure—around 85% in the US—and the inadequacy of current defense strategies. The article underscores the crucial role of cybersecurity in protecting infrastructure, noting both its potential and vulnerabilities. They advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes technological, communal, and commercial interdependencies to bolster security efforts.
Laugé, Hernantes, and Sarriegi (2015) delve into the dependencies among critical infrastructures, emphasizing a holistic, dynamic, and quantitative approach to understanding and mitigating security threats. They discuss past incidents affecting water treatment plants and public transportation, illustrating how technological exploitations can lead to chaos. Their research underscores the importance of continual technological improvement to prevent future vulnerabilities.
Lewis (2014) offers a scientific perspective on critical infrastructure protection, concentrating on information communication systems. The author discusses cyber threats posed by malicious actors leveraging confidential data and emphasizes the importance of identifying and prioritizing infrastructure vulnerabilities. The article proposes strategic resource allocation as a way to enhance protective measures, benefitting government, military, and corporate sectors.
Alcaraz and Zeadally (2015) examine the current measures for infrastructure protection, highlighting gaps and proposing enhancements. They emphasize the necessity of preparedness, timely response, and the integration of public and private security sectors. Their work advocates for improved collaborative frameworks, idea sharing, and holistic security strategies to withstand terrorist acts and natural disasters effectively.
Lastly, Clark and Hakim (2017) focus on cyber-physical security at state, provincial, and local levels. They stress the importance of preparedness, interoperability between sectors, and the integration of technological solutions for resilience. The authors divide the roles of public and private sectors, emphasizing that coordinated efforts can significantly reduce vulnerabilities caused by cyber threats.
Overall, the collection of these scholarly articles underscores the complexity and importance of integrating technological, strategic, and collaborative measures to safeguard national infrastructure. The dynamic nature of threats requires continuous innovation, coordination, and resource allocation among various stakeholders to ensure resilience and security of critical systems. As technological advancements continue, so too must the strategies evolve to address emerging vulnerabilities and threats effectively, emphasizing a proactive rather than reactive stance in national security planning.
References
- Karabacak, B., Yildirim, S. O., & Baykal, N. (2016). A vulnerability-driven cyber security maturity model for measuring national critical infrastructure protection. Retrieved from [source]
- Baggett, R. K., & Simpkins, B. K. (2018). Homeland security and critical infrastructure protection. ABC-CLIO.
- Laugé, A., Hernantes, J., & Sarriegi, J. M. (2015). Critical infrastructure dependencies: A holistic, dynamic and quantitative approach. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 8, 16-23.
- Lewis, T. G. (2014). Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: defending a networked nation. John Wiley & Sons.
- Alcaraz, C., & Zeadally, S. (2015). Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century. International journal of critical infrastructure protection, 8, 53-66.
- Clark, R. M., & Hakim, S. (2017). Protecting critical infrastructure at the state, provincial, and local levels: Issues in cyber-physical security. In Cyber-Physical Security (pp. 1-17). Springer, Cham.