Navigating The Keiser Library Databases Log In Username Stud

Navigating The Keiser Library Databaseslog Inusername Student Id P

Navigate the Keiser Library databases by logging in with your username (student ID) and password (first name). Access the database links and select the Gale Database Platform. Within Gale, find and select "Opposing Viewpoints in Context." Scroll down to select a featured topic for your assignment; any of the topics available are acceptable.

Paper For Above instruction

The global economic model significantly influences students' career prospects, higher education practices, and institutional policies. As recent discussions and research illuminate, the current economic framework creates considerable challenges for recent graduates, especially within a globalized and multicultural context. This paper explores how economic structures impact higher education, graduate employment, and diversity, as well as potential solutions to mitigate these issues.

In recent years, the global economy has experienced stagnation and sluggish recovery, profoundly affecting the higher education landscape. According to Grummon (2010), thousands of college graduates are leaving university with substantial student debt and limited employment opportunities, contradicting the traditional belief that a university degree guarantees a lucrative job. Radermacher et al. (2014) highlight that even those with degrees in fields such as accounting and nursing face difficult job prospects, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among employed graduates. This phenomenon underscores a fundamental flaw in the current economic system and its influence on higher education.

The prevailing economic model, primarily driven by capitalism, concentrates power and resources within large corporations that control employment opportunities and economic growth. Consequently, these entities determine who gains employment, often disregarding the skills acquired through higher education. This creates a disconnect between academic training and labor market requirements, leading to underemployment and unemployment among graduates. Furthermore, the economic framework discourages institutions from fostering strong ties with their alumni or promoting community engagement, as future financial contributions from graduates diminish when employment prospects are bleak. These dynamics threaten the sustainability of higher education institutions and influence legislative policies that further entrench these disparities.

Beyond the domestic implications, the economic model's impact is felt globally. Many students, especially from minority and marginalized communities, pursue higher education with the hope of social mobility. However, the flooded job market and limited opportunities further marginalize these groups. Trevena (2013) discusses how highly skilled immigrants in fields such as medicine, accounting, and nursing often face obstacles in securing employment in host countries like the United States. Similarly, a study by the Resolution Foundation (2017) reveals that graduates from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic backgrounds are less likely to find suitable employment than their white counterparts, perpetuating systemic inequalities in the labor force.

This systemic problem necessitates comprehensive solutions. Firstly, the emphasis on academic performance as the primary measure of success should be reevaluated. Encouraging the pursuit of diverse interests, including arts, sports, and vocational training, can foster a more holistic development approach that aligns better with various employment opportunities. Secondly, governments worldwide should implement transition programs that support recent graduates in entering the workforce. These programs should focus on skill development tailored to evolving labor market demands, such as digital literacy and soft skills enhancement. Creating more job opportunities and fostering collaborations between educational institutions and industries can bridge the gap between education and employment.

Furthermore, reforming higher education funding and support systems can help mitigate disparities. Implementing policies that promote inclusivity and equity, especially for minority groups, is essential in addressing systemic biases. Initiatives such as targeted scholarships, mentorship programs, and apprenticeship schemes can enhance the employability of marginalized students. Additionally, policymakers should advocate for economic reforms that reduce income inequality and promote sustainable growth, thus creating an environment where higher education can serve as an effective pathway to economic and social mobility.

In conclusion, the current global economic model significantly impacts higher education and graduate employment, especially affecting minority communities. To create a resilient and inclusive higher education system, stakeholders must reconsider the primary indicators of success, diversify pathways for students, and implement policies that foster equitable economic opportunities. Addressing these systemic issues requires coordinated efforts from governments, educational institutions, and industries to realign economic incentives with social well-being and sustainable growth.

References

• Grummon, P. (2010). Trends: In Higher Education. Planning for Higher Education, 38(3), 51–59.
• Jones, J., & Schmitt, J. (2014). A college degree is no guarantee. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
• Radermacher, R., et al. (2014). Investigating the skill gap between graduating students and industry expectations. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, ACM.
• Trevena, P. (2013). Why do highly educated migrants go for low-skilled jobs? Mobility in Transition, 169.
• Resolution Foundation. (2017). The labour market and graduate employment outcomes. London: Resolution Foundation.
• Williams, X. (2018). The impacts of economic policies on higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 33(2), 147–165.
• Smith, A. & Lee, D. (2019). Diversity and inclusion in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Development, 67, 9–17.
• Kim, S. & Nguyen, P. (2020). Structural inequalities in graduate employment: A comparative analysis. Sociology of Education, 93(1), 50–66.
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2021). Education as a driver of sustainable development. UNESCO Reports.
• World Bank. (2022). The global employment crisis and policy responses. World Bank Publications.