Need 100 Authentic Work, No Plagiarism, Can Use Websites For

Need 100 Authentic Work No Plagiarism Can Use Websites For Referenc

Answer ALL the following questions: 1. “He realized the value of thinking like one’s opponent – seeing things as they do.” Explain what this means and give some examples to illustrate this view.

2. “The Chinese insisted that custom required the visitor—Glazer—to make the first presentation. This he did, even though he was accustomed to allowing his opponents to speak first.” What are the advantages and drawbacks of making the first offer?

3. “Glazer could hardly believe that he had lowered his price twenty per-cent that week.” What does this tell you about Glazer’s ZOPA?

4. What can we ‘assume’ about the way Glazer did his due diligence? Evaluate the approach.

5. Name three tactics the Chinese used in the second meeting. Evaluate briefly how Glazer dealt with them.

6. “Glazer remembered the tight deadlines he had faced on previous trips to China; now positions had been reversed, with the Chinese facing the pressures and deadlines.” What does this tell you about Glazer’s preparation strategy for the negotiation?

7. “For the first time, the Chinese made a counter offer. Auger-Aiso accepted, and agreement was reached.” Why do you think Auger-Aiso agreed at this point?

8. “He believed that Auger-Aiso had been awarded the contract because it had been the preferred supplier right from the start.” How does this belief relate to understanding the difference between distributive and integrative bargaining?

Paper For Above instruction

Negotiation is a complex process that requires a deep understanding of both the opposing party's interests and the strategic use of tactics to reach mutually beneficial agreements. The case “Bargaining Price with the Chinese” offers rich insights into effective negotiation strategies, cultural considerations, and the importance of perspective-taking.

1. The Value of Thinking Like One’s Opponent

Understanding the importance of viewing negotiations from the opponent’s perspective is foundational to successful bargaining. As highlighted by the quote, “He realized the value of thinking like one’s opponent – seeing things as they do,” the negotiator gains vital insights into the other party’s motivations, priorities, and constraints (Shell, 2006). For example, in the case, Glazer recognized that the Chinese valued face-saving and indirect communication, which influenced his approach to negotiations. By appreciating that the Chinese preferred to keep negotiations subtle and strategic, Glazer adjusted his own tactics, allowing him to better anticipate their reactions and respond effectively. Reflecting on this, it becomes evident that perspective-taking fosters empathy and enables negotiators to craft proposals that align with the other’s cultural and strategic preferences, thereby increasing the likelihood of success (Lax & Sebenius, 1986).

2. Advantages and Drawbacks of Making the First Offer

The Chinese custom of insisting that the visitor make the first presentation can be viewed through the lens of strategic advantage. Making the first offer can set the anchor, influencing the negotiation's range and perception (Galinsky & Mussweiler, 2001). The advantage lies in controlling the initial parameters, signaling confidence, and framing the bargaining zone. However, a drawback is that the first offer might be too high or too low, giving the opponent an unfair advantage or forcing concessions. In Glazer’s case, he chose to present first, which allowed him to set a high initial figure, but he also prepared to accept flexibility, demonstrating an understanding of the importance of strategic ambiguity and cultural etiquette (Louden, 2008).

3. Glazer’s ZOPA and Price Reduction

Glazer’s remark about lowering his price by twenty percent reveals that his zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) was broader than he initially perceived. ZOPA refers to the range within which both parties can find a mutually acceptable agreement (Fisher, Ury, & Patton, 2011). The significant reduction indicates that he identified a real opportunity for value creation within the negotiations. This flexibility suggests that Glazer was willing to adjust his expectations and find common ground, highlighting the importance of understanding one's BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) to avoid unnecessary concessions and build leverage (Raiffa, 2002).

4. Due Diligence: Assumptions and Evaluation

It can be assumed that Glazer conducted detailed research about the Chinese market, their negotiating style, and the competitors involved. His recognition of the changing tactics implies prior preparation and an understanding of Chinese negotiation culture, which often involves patience, role-playing, and strategic misdirection (Yang, 2006). His approach appears to be comprehensive, involving cultural sensitivity, scenario planning, and strategic flexibility. Such due diligence is vital to adapt quickly to dynamic negotiation environments and maintain a competitive edge.

5. Chinese Tactics in the Second Meeting and Glazer’s Response

Three key tactics employed by the Chinese included: (a) role-playing outbursts to test reactions; (b) positioning different negotiators to exert pressure; and (c) orchestrating bid comparisons between vendors in adjacent rooms. Glazer addressed these tactics by remaining calm, recognizing them as strategic plays rather than genuine disputes, and maintaining focus on analytics and data rather than emotional responses (Pruitt & Rubin, 2005). His ability to interpret these behaviors as part of a strategic game allowed him to stay composed and adapt accordingly.

6. Glazer’s Preparation Strategy Amid Changed Pressures

Glazer’s reflection on the reversed pressures underscores the importance of flexibility and anticipatory planning. His prior experience with Chinese negotiation tactics informed his strategy, emphasizing patience, cultural awareness, and robust planning. Recognizing that Chinese negotiators faced deadlines and pressures himself, Glazer aligned his approach to leverage the Chinese’s urgency without seeming desperate, embodying principles of strategic patience and contingent planning (Thompson, 2009).

7. Why Did Auger-Aiso Agree at the Counter Offer?

Auger-Aiso likely agreed due to a combination of factors, including the perception of a long-term relationship, the strategic value of securing the contract despite a lower margin, and the Chinese tactics of prolonging negotiations to extract concessions. Their acceptance signifies the culmination of a strategic move where the vendor recognizes that further haggling might jeopardize the deal (Lax & Sebenius, 2006). Moreover, accepting the counteroffer may have been influenced by the understanding that the deal aligned with their broader Chinese market expansion strategy.

8. Belief in Preference for Auger-Aiso and Distributive vs. Integrative Bargaining

Glazer’s belief that Auger-Aiso was awarded the contract because it had been the preferred supplier reflects an assumption that the negotiations involved a more integrative bargaining approach, where mutual value and long-term relationships matter more than simple distributive gains (Thompson, 2009). Unlike distributive bargaining, which views negotiations as a zero-sum game focused on claiming value, integrative bargaining emphasizes expanding the pie and creating value for all parties. Glazer’s perspective indicates that his organization sought to build trust and reputation, aligning with strategies that prioritize relationship-building and partnership over mere price competition (Fisher, Ury, & Patton, 2011).

References

• Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). >Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin.
• Galinsky, A., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). “Always go to the Mind-Set: How the Anchoring Effect Can Be Managed.” Psychological Science, 12(4), 350-356.
• Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (1986). The Manager as Negotiator. Free Press.
• Lax, D. A., & Sebenius, J. K. (2006). 3D Negotiation: Healing Absence, Repairing Relationships, and Negotiating with Integrity. Harvard Business Review Press.
• Louden, J. (2008). Negotiation Ethics: The Role of Culture. International Journal of Business and Management, 3(9), 123-133.
• Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (2005). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. McGraw-Hill.
• Raiffa, H. (2002). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.
• Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin.
• Thompson, L. (2009). The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Pearson.
• Yang, J. (2006). Culture and Negotiation in China. Negotiation Journal, 22(3), 247-263.