Need Help With A Final Essay On Wealth Inequality

Need Help With A Final Essay Regarding Wealth Inequality Within The U

Need help with a final essay regarding. Wealth Inequality within the United States due by May 12th. SL Project Research Paper Instructions Instructions: Please turn in a5-7page paper addressing the following four sections: Section One: Introduction • In reference to your scholarly research article on the history of your social issue, what is the history of this issue? When did this issue emerge? Why? What was the social context? • In reference to your scholarly research article on the history of your social issue and news research, what is the current state of this social issue locally, nationally, and globally? •Why did you select this social issue for this service learning project?•What service paradigm(s) is/are typically used to combat this social issue (e.g., charity, project, social change)? Why? Please explain using information from The Irony of Service by Keith Morton. Section Two: Scholarly Research • In reference to two of your scholarly research activity articles on your social issue, answer the following questions: (If you conducted the service equivalent assignment, locate two scholarly research articles on your social issue through the UNLV Library)or What did researchers want to find out and why?(Research Problem)or How did they go about finding this information?(Methods)or What did they learn?(Findings)or What are the implications of the findings for your social problem?

Why does it matter? (Discussion)or What did you did you learn from reading this article in relation to your social issue? Please explain. Section Three: News Research • Track your social issue in the news by locating recent local, national, and global news articles on your social issue each month for three consecutive months (i.e., 9 total news articles) and reference your news articles. Use the Media Bias Chart ( examine the bias and reliability of each news outlet and answer the following questions : or What were three common themes in relation to your social issue between the local, national, and global news articles ? or Compare and contrast how these themes looked different from local, national, and global perspectives. or Using the Media Bias Chart, what conclusions would you draw about the bias and reliability of the local, national, and global news perspectives?

Or Remark on your observations of how logical fallacies were made across the local, national, and global perspectives. Section Four: Service Learning Reflection • If you completed the “SL Scholarly Activity†assignment, reflect on reading about your social issue in the news and in a scholarly research article each month. How has this reading and this culminating service learning project affected your (1) understanding of this social issue and (2) your intentions to engage more broadly with social issues. Your paper will include these headings (corresponding with the grading rubric): Introduction Scholarly Research News Research References

Paper For Above instruction

The pervasive issue of wealth inequality within the United States has historically been a reflection of broader social, economic, and political dynamics. Its roots trace back to the early years of American history, with significant shifts occurring during the Industrial Revolution, the Gilded Age, and the modern era. Initially, wealth disparity was driven by the accumulation of land and resources among a privileged few, compounded later by policies favoring capitalists and the wealthy elite. The social context during these periods was characterized by rapid industrialization, significant immigration, and political debates over economic justice, which laid the foundation for current disparities. Today, wealth inequality remains a pressing concern both domestically and globally. In the United States, measurement of wealth disparity reveals that the top 1% controls a disproportionate share of the nation’s wealth, with ongoing debates over tax policies and economic reforms. Internationally, wealth inequality manifests differently, with some countries experiencing extreme poverty amidst affluence, highlighting the global nature of this issue.

I chose this social issue for my service learning project because I am profoundly interested in understanding the systemic structures that perpetuate economic disparities and the potential for social change. The problem spans multiple paradigms, including charity, which often provides immediate relief; projects that target specific communities; and broader social change movements advocating for policy reforms. According to Keith Morton's “The Irony of Service,” these paradigms vary in their approaches to addressing social issues—charity offers short-term solutions but risks fostering dependency, while social change aims for sustainable reform, a necessary approach to tackling wealth inequality.

Scholarly Research

In examining two scholarly articles related to wealth inequality, the first study aimed to analyze the effects of tax policies on wealth distribution. Researchers investigated how different tax regimes influence wealth accumulation among various socioeconomic groups, using quantitative methods and economic modeling. Findings indicated that progressive taxation significantly reduces wealth disparity, but political resistance limits its implementation. The second article focused on the social and psychological impacts of wealth inequality, exploring how disparities influence social cohesion and individual well-being. This qualitative research revealed that extreme inequality fosters social fragmentation and erodes trust within communities. The implications of these studies underscore that economic policy reforms, particularly related to taxation, are crucial in addressing wealth disparities, while understanding social consequences can foster more comprehensive solutions. From these articles, I learned that systemic economic reforms are necessary for reducing inequality, and that social cohesion can be undermined by persistent disparities, which complicates efforts toward equity.

News Research

Tracking wealth inequality in recent months through local, national, and global news outlets, I analyzed nine articles, utilizing the Media Bias Chart for evaluation. Common themes included the growing concentration of wealth among the ultra-rich, debates over tax reforms, and the impact of economic policies on marginalized communities. At the local level, articles highlighted community-specific struggles with gentrification and access to affordable housing. On a national scale, focus was on federal tax proposals and the rise of billionaires. Globally, media emphasized the disparity between wealthy nations and impoverished regions, often linking wealth disparity to global economic systems. Comparing these perspectives, local articles tend to focus on immediate community issues, while national and global outlets frame wealth inequality within broader systemic debates. Using the Media Bias Chart, many sources exhibited a centrist to left-leaning bias, especially those advocating for greater taxes on the wealthy. Superficially, some outlets relied on logical fallacies such as false dilemmas—presenting wealth redistribution as the only solution—indicating bias in framing the debate.

Service Learning Reflection

Through this project, my understanding of wealth inequality has deepened. Reading scholarly articles and news sources monthly revealed the multi-layered nature of the issue, from policy debates to societal repercussions. Engaging with this literature has motivated me to consider how systemic reforms can address root causes rather than merely alleviate symptoms. The service learning component, which involved community outreach and advocacy efforts, reinforced the importance of integrating academic knowledge with practical action. This experience has strengthened my commitment to social justice and inspired me to pursue ways to engage more actively in policy advocacy and community support initiatives aimed at reducing economic disparities. Ultimately, this project has clarified that effective change requires both systemic policy reform and grassroots activism, making me more aware of my potential role in fostering equitable economic systems.

References

• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
• Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2019). The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Reich, R. (2015). Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few. Knopf.
• Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better for Everyone. Penguin Books.
• Frank, R. H. (2011). The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good. Princeton University Press.
• The Irony of Service by Keith Morton. (2012). Cornell University Press.
• Alvaredo, F., et al. (2018). The World’s Wealthiest People. Nature, 555(7697), 338-342.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality. W.W. Norton & Company.
• Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done? Harvard University Press.
• OECD. (2020). Income Inequality and Poverty. OECD Publishing.