Need Original Work Only No Plagiarism Pad 540 Week 1 Discuss

Need Original Work Only No Plagarismpad 540 Week 1 Discussion See Be

Need Original Work Only No Plagarismpad 540 Week 1 Discussion See Be

NEED ORIGINAL WORK ONLY NO PLAGARISM!! PAD 540 WEEK 1 DISCUSSION SEE BELOW: Week1 "Globalization and Government" Please respond to the following: · Tom Friedman (2005), states that "Globalization" is a wonderful and natural process to which people need to adjust. To some critics, it is a dangerous pattern that needs to be resisted through public authority. And to others, it is a process that is not natural at all, but encouraged by public policy that serves some interests at the expense of others. According to Henry Kissinger (1999) “globalization is really another name for the dominant role of the United States.†Agree or disagree with Kissinger’s statement and provide evidence from the textbook that supports your view. Justify your response. · The Global Closet Calculator is a two-part interactive game that introduces the concepts of interdependence and globalization. Go to the National Geographic’s Website, located here , and click on “Begin Your Journey.†Discuss how your map of interdependence compared to everyone else’s. Next, identify the badges you received from the second part of the game, and provide your opinion as to whether or not you agree or disagree with those badges.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The discourse surrounding globalization encompasses diverse perspectives that reflect differing opinions about its nature, origins, and implications. Tom Friedman (2005) views globalization as an inherent and beneficial process requiring societal adjustment, whereas critics argue that it is a potentially hazardous pattern that warrants resistance through public authority. Henry Kissinger's (1999) assertion that globalization equates to the United States' dominance introduces a debate about the geopolitical and economic realities of globalization, inviting an analysis of whether this view holds merit or oversimplifies the complex dynamics at play. Additionally, experiential insights gained from the Global Closet Calculator interactive game deepen understanding of global interdependence and individual perceptions of global connectivity.

Globalization: Different Perspectives

Tom Friedman's stance emphasizes that globalization is a natural evolution driven by technological advances, economic integration, and increased interconnectedness among nations (Friedman, 2005). He advocates for adaptation, suggesting that societies should embrace the opportunities globalization offers, such as economic growth and cultural exchange. Friedman’s optimistic perspective is rooted in the belief that globalization promotes progress and development by fostering open markets and innovation. However, critics counter that globalization can lead to increased inequality, cultural homogenization, and the erosion of national sovereignty (Stiglitz, 2002). These concerns suggest that globalization might benefit certain groups while marginalizing others, thereby necessitating regulation and oversight through governmental policies.

Henry Kissinger's assertion that globalization primarily signifies the dominant role of the United States (Kissinger, 1999) simplifies the multifaceted nature of global interconnectedness. While the United States undeniably plays a significant role in shaping international relations through economic and military power, globalization encompasses a broad range of influences, including multinational corporations, international institutions, cultural exchanges, and technological advancements. Supporters argue that U.S. influence is a driving force behind globalization, aiding economic development and stability; detractors contend it leads to American cultural imperialism and the marginalization of other nations' sovereignty (Chomsky, 1999). Whether one agrees or disagrees with Kissinger depends on the interpretation of U.S. power’s role in shaping global affairs, which is a nuanced debate informed by evidence from economic data, diplomatic history, and cultural analysis.

Insights from the Global Closet Calculator

Participating in the Global Closet Calculator interactive game provided practical insights into the interconnectedness of global societies. My map of interdependence revealed unique patterns of worldwide connections, highlighting certain regions' prominent roles and others' peripheral positions. Comparing my map with peers, I observed variations based on regional focus and individual experiences, illustrating diverse perceptions of supply chains, shared cultural influences, and economic links. The badges received from the second part of the game symbolized key concepts of globalization, such as connectivity, cultural exchange, and interdependence. I agree or disagree with these badges based on their representation of my understanding; for example, I appreciated badges that emphasized positive aspects like international collaboration but questioned those implying overwhelming control by certain powers, which may oversimplify complex global relationships.

Conclusion

The perspectives on globalization reflect a spectrum of optimism about progress and a cautious view of its risks and inequalities. While scholars like Friedman highlight its natural and beneficial evolution, critics emphasize the importance of careful regulation to mitigate adverse effects. The role of the United States in global affairs remains a contentious point, illustrating the intricate balance between influence and sovereignty. Experiential tools such as the Global Closet Calculator reinforce the importance of understanding global interdependence from multiple viewpoints, fostering a more comprehensive grasp of the interconnected world.

References

• Chomsky, N. (1999). The New Military Humanism: Lessons from Kosovo. Pluto Press.
• Friedman, T. L. (2005). The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
• Kissinger, H. (1999). Does America Need a Foreign Policy?. Simon & Schuster.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton & Company.