Need Within 20 Hours: Two Parts, 250 Words Or More Each Part

Need Within 20 Hours Two Parts 250 Words Or More For Each Partpart

PART 1: Case study: RJR formed a joint venture with Gallaher Group PLC in 2002 to produce and sell a limited variety of American-blend cigarette brands that will be marketed in France, Spain, Italy, and the Canary Islands. The company, known as R.J. Reynolds - Gallaher International Sarl, is based in Switzerland. RJR has a large global presence, with subsidiaries in 57 countries including Finland, Vietnam, Poland, and Tanzania. RJR now controls nearly 4 percent of the international cigarette market and has witnessed a 75 percent global sales increase since 1990. Global sales now account for 41 percent of the tobacco sales for RJR. RJR purchased a majority share of the Tanzanian Cigarette Company in 1995 for $55 million. This was the largest single investment in the country since it achieved independence in 1961. The Dar Es Salaam plant was quickly renovated and will soon produce 4 billion cigarettes per year, making it one of the largest producers in Africa. RJR’s facilities also operate in Turkey where they account for half of the country’s exports. (David, 2005, p.. Illustrate the difficulties of establishing and managing a subsidiary in terms of strategic ethical considerations – not only because of differences in corporate (organizational) cultures, but also in national cultures and laws. 2. Explain in your own words why RJR prefers to work with a local partner to establish a joint venture rather than simply acquiring a company in another country. Support your rationale, based not only on ethical considerations, but also on other external factors that you have learned throughout this course.

Paper For Above instruction

Establishing and managing subsidiaries in foreign countries presents various strategic and ethical challenges that companies like R.J. Reynolds (RJR) must navigate carefully. These difficulties are rooted in differences in corporate and national cultures, as well as diverse legal systems. When RJR formed subsidiaries or joint ventures in countries such as Tanzania, Turkey, and others, it encountered distinct organizational norms, cultural values, and legal frameworks that could influence operational effectiveness, ethical standards, and stakeholder relationships.

One of the primary challenges involves aligning corporate culture with local cultural norms. American corporate culture often emphasizes individualism, direct communication, and a focus on short-term profitability. Conversely, many countries, including those in Africa and Asia, tend to prioritize collectivism, hierarchical respect, and long-term relationship building. RJR’s clear corporate policies might conflict with local expectations or customs, creating misunderstandings and resistance among local employees and partners. For example, local employees may view transparency or direct criticism differently, and management might need to adapt their communication style to foster trust and cooperation. Failing to respect or understand these cultural differences can lead to mismanagement, low morale, or ethical breaches that tarnish the company's reputation.

Legal and regulatory disparities further compound these issues. Different countries have varying standards regarding advertising, labor laws, environmental regulations, and corporate governance. For instance, tobacco advertising is highly regulated in many European countries due to health concerns, while some developing nations might have less stringent policies. RJR must ensure compliance while maintaining its brand integrity, which can be challenging when local laws conflict with corporate policies or international standards. Ethical considerations like respecting local laws versus upholding global corporate ethics require sensitivity and adaptability to avoid accusations of cultural imperialism or exploitation.

Moreover, political stability and corruption levels differ significantly across countries. In nations prone to corruption, establishing a subsidiary might involve navigating unethical practices, which can threaten the company's ethical stance and social responsibility commitments. For example, in Tanzania, RJR's investment into the local tobacco industry required careful management to avoid ethical pitfalls and ensure compliance with both local and international anti-corruption standards.

RJR’s preference for joint ventures over outright acquisitions stems from multiple external factors beyond ethical considerations. Forming a joint venture with a local partner allows RJR to mitigate risks associated with unfamiliar legal environments, political instability, and cultural differences. Local partners bring mutual understanding of the local market, navigate legal systems more effectively, and foster relationships that can be crucial for market access and regulatory compliance. Additionally, joint ventures are viewed as socially responsible because they promote local economic development, employment, and technology transfer, aligning with corporate social responsibility principles. In contrast, acquisitions often face resistance from local communities and regulators, especially if perceived as neocolonial or exploitative, which could damage reputation and hinder long-term success.

Furthermore, collaborating with local firms provides insights into consumer preferences and behavior, facilitating tailored marketing strategies and product offerings. This collaborative approach aligns with the ethical principle of respecting local cultures and respecting stakeholders' interests. It also minimizes cultural clashes and enhances corporate legitimacy in host countries. External factors such as restrictive foreign investment policies, anti-monopoly laws, or nationalist sentiments may also discourage full acquisitions, making joint ventures a more feasible and ethically palatable route.

Paper For Above instruction

PART 2: Case study: A leading-edge U.S. computer firm announced from the headquarters in the United States that a new product would be available to its Japanese customers in October 1988. This official announcement was communicated through the corporate communication channel to the management at its Japanese subsidiary. This availability date was later postponed by 4 months and then postponed again several times. All the subsequent delays were communicated officially to the management at its Japanese subsidiary once any of the subsequent unexpected supply chain management disruptions were uncovered by the US headquarters. The employees at the Japanese subsidiary were furious about this chain of events and humiliated at having to inform their customers about these delays. Later, a key sales manager was so ashamed of his company’s behavior that he left the company. (Carroll & Gannon, 1997, p.. Assume that you are a member of the strategic planning committee that intends to design the ethical standards for the international human resource management of your company. 2. Interpret what you think have caused the reactions of the Japanese sales manager as mentioned in the Case Study. How are the personal ethics and corporate ethics interpreted differently (a) in the USA, and (b) in Japan?

Paper For Above instruction

The reactions of the Japanese sales manager in the case study can be attributed to several cultural and ethical differences between Japan and the United States. The primary cause appears to be the misalignment between corporate communication practices and the cultural expectations surrounding honesty, responsibility, and respect. In Japan, a collective society with a high value placed on harmony, loyalty, and face-saving, the repeated postponements and lack of transparent communication about delays significantly undermined trust and created feelings of humiliation and betrayal among employees, especially those responsible for customer interactions. Japanese employees tend to emphasize accountability that aligns with group harmony and seniority, so when their company failed to honor its commitments openly, it caused their sense of integrity to suffer.

In contrast, American corporate culture tends to prioritize transparency, individual accountability, and quick problem-solving. While the delays and communication issues would still be viewed as problematic, the emphasis would be on taking corrective actions and learning from mistakes rather than preserving face or avoiding shame. Personal ethics in the U.S. often tolerate admitting faults directly and openly, viewing honesty as essential to building trust and credibility. However, in Japan, such honesty must be balanced with considerations of harmony and face, which can influence how corporate missteps are perceived and managed.

The differences in interpreting ethics reflect the broader societal values. In the United States, personal ethics are often guided by individual responsibility, transparency, and legal accountability, which are reinforced by a legal system that emphasizes rights and responsibilities. Corporate ethics tend to focus on stakeholder trust, transparency, and compliance with laws. Conversely, in Japan, ethical behavior is deeply tied to social harmony, respect for seniority, and avoiding shame or loss of face. Japanese corporate ethics prioritize group cohesion, indirect communication, and maintaining reputation both internally and externally. As a result, the Japanese sales manager’s shame and resignation stem from a breach of these cultural values, exacerbated by the perceived failure of the company to act ethically according to local norms.

References

• Carroll, A. B., & Gannon, M. J. (1997). International Management: Culture, Strategy, and Behavior. South-Western College Pub.
• David, F. R. (2005). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Pearson Education.
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publications.
• Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1999). Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics. Harvard Business School Press.
• Yoshino, K., & Murakami, D. (2011). Ethical issues in international business: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of International Business Ethics.
• Meyer, E. (2014). The Culture Map: Breaking Through the Invisible Boundaries of Global Business. PublicAffairs.
• Rose, M. (2000). Business ethics in Japan: Societal and organizational perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics.
• Blodgett, J. G., & Caylor, M. J. (2002). Company Culture and Ethical Behavior: Cultural Influences on Managerial Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics.
• Schneider, S. C., & Barsoux, J.-L. (2003). Managing Across Cultures. Pearson Education.
• U.S. Department of Commerce. (1988). Ethics and International Business Practice Guidelines. Washington, D.C.