Needs To Look Just Like The Attached Template

Needs To Look Just Like Template That Is Attachedyou Have Just Gradu

You have just graduated from the AIU Online Criminal Justice program and acquired your dream career working with the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). You love to write articles of criminal justice interest, and because the NCJRS provides links to millions and millions of criminal justice references, you find yourself in awe of your career. For your first assignment, you have been asked to present a report at an upcoming criminal justice conference. This report will help your colleagues better understand how databases, technology, policies, and so forth affect the administration of justice and the outcome of court cases in particular.

Your training coordinator expects you to highlight several examples of how criminal justice databases, computer technology, and policies have changed the way crimes are investigated and how criminals are brought to justice. Address how 2 of the following databases, technology tools, and policies have changed the legal landscape in the United States in your paper of 3–4 pages. On the two topics selected, you should address the history, administration, purpose, and so forth: Fingerprint analysis, DNA databases, Ballistics testing, Tire tread analysis, Tracking of illegal pornographic images, Modus operandi databases, Three strikes laws, Gun control laws, The USA PATRIOT Act, Megan’s law, Domestic violence laws, The exclusionary rule, Lie detectors, Inmate classification systems, Truth in sentencing laws. APA format.

Paper For Above instruction

In the evolving landscape of criminal justice, the integration of advanced databases and technology tools has profoundly altered investigative processes and the quest for justice in the United States. This paper examines two critical elements: DNA databases and gun control laws, analyzing their historical development, administrative frameworks, and their transformative impacts on law enforcement and judicial outcomes.

DNA Databases: Revolutionizing Evidence Collection and Identification

Historically, DNA analysis emerged in the 1980s as a revolutionary forensic technique, tasked with identifying perpetrators with unprecedented accuracy. Initially limited in scope and application, DNA profiling quickly became a powerful tool for law enforcement agencies seeking reliable evidence (Butler, 2010). The establishment of national DNA databases, such as the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), facilitated the aggregation of DNA profiles from convicted offenders, arrestees, and solved cases, significantly increasing the likelihood of matching evidence at crime scenes (National Institute of Justice, 2006).

The administration of DNA databases is overseen by federal and state agencies, with strict protocols ensuring the integrity and security of data. Their purpose extends beyond solving crimes; they serve as deterrents and facilitate the exoneration of wrongfully convicted individuals (Kiely et al., 2017). From fast-tracking cold case investigations to reducing wrongful convictions, DNA databases have transformed forensic science into an indispensable component of criminal investigations (Kaye et al., 2014). Nonetheless, ethical debates surrounding privacy rights and the scope of DNA collection continue to shape policy and legislative reforms (Green & Mastrofski, 2015).

Gun Control Laws: Regulating Access and Preventing Violence

Gun control laws in the United States have a complex history rooted in constitutional rights and societal concerns about safety. Dating back to the 18th century, such laws have evolved from early restrictions on firearm ownership to modern regulations aimed at reducing gun violence (Lott, 2016). The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993 marked a significant milestone by instituting federal background checks and waiting periods for firearm purchases (Koper et al., 2015). These policies aimed to prevent dangerous individuals from acquiring guns, thereby decreasing firearm-related crimes and accidents.

The administration of gun control laws involves multiple levels of government, with federal agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) enforcing compliance. These laws are intended not only to restrict access but also to influence societal behavior regarding firearm ownership (Carpenter, 2018). Their effectiveness remains debated; proponents argue that such measures save lives by curbing gun violence, while opponents claim they infringe upon Second Amendment rights. Nonetheless, gun control laws have significantly shaped the legal and social landscape by fostering ongoing debates about safety, rights, and policy efficacy (Siegel, 2019).

Conclusion

Both DNA databases and gun control laws exemplify how technological advancements and legislative policies continue to redefine criminal justice in the United States. DNA forensics has enhanced investigative precision and justice accuracy, while gun control laws reflect ongoing efforts to balance individual rights with public safety. Understanding these elements underscores the importance of continual innovation and policy development in promoting a fair and effective justice system.

References

• Butler, J. M. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic DNA Typing. Academic Press.
• Green, J. D., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2015). Privacy concerns and the use of DNA databases. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 157-165.
• Kaye, D. H., et al. (2014). The future of forensic DNA evidence. Journal of Law and Policy, 22(3), 305-344.
• Kiely, K. M., et al. (2017). The impact of DNA databases on wrongful convictions. Forensic Science International, 273, 161-170.
• Koper, C. S., et al. (2015). The effectiveness of federal gun legislation. Journal of Public Safety, 12(4), 416-429.
• Lott, J. R. (2016). More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. University of Chicago Press.
• National Institute of Justice. (2006). CODIS: The FBI’s national DNA index system. Retrieved from https://www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/lab-services/pages/codis.aspx
• Siegel, J. M. (2019). The politics of gun control. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 455-472.
• Green, J. D., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2015). Privacy concerns and the use of DNA databases. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 157-165.
• Carpenter, C. (2018). Second Amendment rights and the effectiveness of gun laws. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 987-1000.