Neo Psychoanalytic And Behavioral Personality Theories Based

Neo Psychoanalytic And Behavioral Personality Theoriesbased On Your Re

Neo Psychoanalytic and Behavioral personality theories involve different approaches to understanding personality development, functioning, and change. The assignment requires accessing the Personality Theory Matrix to compare these two approaches, focusing on key ideas, differences, and similarities.

For the Neo-Psychoanalytic theory, a key idea is that personality is influenced by unconscious processes, early childhood experiences, and internal conflicts. This perspective emphasizes the importance of the subconscious mind, defense mechanisms, and unresolved psychodynamic conflicts in shaping an individual's behavior and personality. Notable theorists such as Freud, along with later neo-psychoanalytic thinkers like Karen Horney and Erik Erikson, expanded on the importance of internal drives and the influence of childhood relationships in personality development.

In contrast, the Behavioral theory focuses on observable behaviors and the external environment's role in shaping personality. It asserts that personality is learned through interactions with the environment via processes such as classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and observational learning. The core idea is that behaviors are reinforced or punished over time, leading to the development of consistent patterns. Psychologists such as B.F. Skinner and John Watson emphasized the importance of empirical observation and measurement in understanding personality without considering internal mental states.

Paper For Above instruction

One key idea from the neo-psychoanalytic orientation is that unconscious motives and early childhood experiences play a fundamental role in shaping personality. This approach suggests that many behaviors are driven by underlying conflicts or repressed impulses that individuals may not be consciously aware of. For example, Freud’s theory proposed that unresolved conflicts during psychosexual stages influence adult personality traits and behaviors (Cervone & Pervin, 2019). Neo-psychoanalytic theorists have expanded on Freud’s work, emphasizing the importance of internal drives, defense mechanisms, and the influence of early relationships on personality development (Schulz, 2006). The emphasis on internal psychological conflict highlights the depth and complexity of personality, with unconscious processes often operating outside of conscious awareness.

From a behavioral perspective, a key idea is that personality is primarily learned through interactions with the environment. Behaviorists argue that external stimuli and reinforcement histories shape personality traits and behaviors, rather than intra-psychic conflicts or unconscious motives. Classical conditioning explains how reflexive responses become associated with particular stimuli, while operant conditioning demonstrates how behaviors are strengthened through reinforcement or weakened through punishment (Watson & Rayner, 2000). Observational learning, as proposed by Bandura, emphasizes that individuals can acquire new behaviors by observing others, thus modeling external influences rather than internal drives (Phelps, 2015). The behavioral approach’s focus on observable behavior and environmental contingencies makes it highly empirical and measurable.

A main difference between these theories lies in their view of what influences personality. Neo-psychoanalytic theory emphasizes internal mental processes, unconscious motives, and early childhood experiences as the primary determinants. In contrast, behavioral theory concentrates on external environmental factors and learned behaviors without necessarily considering internal mental states or unconscious influences. Essentially, the former is introspective and internally focused, whereas the latter is outwardly observable and environment-focused.

Despite these differences, both theories recognize that behavior can be shaped, modified, or reinforced by external factors. They also acknowledge that personality is not static; with appropriate therapeutic intervention or environmental change, personality traits or behaviors can be altered. Both perspectives also understand the importance of development over time, though their mechanisms of change differ—psychodynamic conflict resolution versus behavioral modification techniques.

Personally, I align more closely with the behavioral theory because of its empirical basis and focus on observable behaviors that can be measured and modified through specific interventions. I appreciate its pragmatic approach to understanding and changing behavior, as well as its applicability to various settings like therapy and education. While I recognize the depth of the neo-psychoanalytic approach, I find its emphasis on unconscious processes and internal conflicts somewhat less accessible and more difficult to measure or observe directly.

References

• Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2019). Personality: Theory and research (14th ed.). Wiley.
• Schulz, C. G. (2006). Applying Sullivan’s theory of anxiety versus fear. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 69(2), 110-112.
• Watson, J. B., & Rayner, R. (2000). Conditioned emotional reactions. American Psychologist, 55(3), 313–317.
• Phelps, B. (2015). Behavioral perspectives on personality and self. The Psychological Record, 65(3), 557–565.
• Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2018). The case of Mrs. C. In Systems of Psychotherapy: A Transtheoretical Analysis (9th ed., pp. 15–17). Oxford University Press.
• Estey, A. J., Coolidge, F. L., Segal, D. L., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Empirical evidence for the heritability of Karen Horney’s three core neurotic trends. American Psychological Association.
• Bernstein, D. A., & Loftus, E. F. (2015). Psychology (4th ed.). Brooks/Cole.
• McLeod, S. (2018). Behaviorist theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/behaviorism.html
• Corey, G. (2013). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall.