Netflix And Their Increasing Fees Collapse Top Of Form The A

Netflix And Their Increasing Feescollapsetop Of Formthe Article By N

The article by Neya Thanikachalam titled "Netflix prices rise, but subscribers stay" discusses how Netflix periodically increases its prices gradually to maintain its subscriber base while increasing revenue. Despite these incremental price hikes, most consumers do not switch to substitutes like Hulu or Amazon Prime, which are perceived as inferior options. Thanikachalam suggests that this behavior aligns with the economic principle of price elasticity of demand; specifically, Netflix appears to be a relatively inelastic good because consumers perceive it as a necessity, making them less sensitive to price changes. The article notes that once consumers are engaged with Netflix, they find it challenging to unsubscribe, reinforcing its position as a necessary service rather than a luxury. Although substitutes exist, many, including myself, prefer Netflix because of its original content and user experience, which are difficult to match elsewhere.

The consumer loyalty to Netflix exemplifies the concept of inelastic demand, where despite repeated price increases, the quantity demanded remains relatively stable. This phenomenon underscores the company's strategic pricing approach and its ability to foster dependency. The importance of original content and consistent user engagement acts as a barrier to switching, illustrating brand loyalty's economic significance. From an ethical standpoint, the steady increase in subscription fees raises questions about affordability for lower-income consumers, but as long as the fees remain manageable, consumers may perceive the service's value as outweighing the cost. The Biblical reference to Job 8:7 in the article highlights the idea of growth over time, symbolizing how Netflix's incremental increases contribute to its long-term profit, much like how small beginnings can lead to substantial outcomes.

Paper For Above instruction

Netflix has transformed the entertainment industry by providing on-demand streaming content that appeals to a global audience. Its ability to increase prices gradually without significant loss of subscribers reflects critical economic principles, particularly the concept of price elasticity of demand. Elasticity measures how sensitive the quantity demanded of a good is to a change in its price. Netflix appears to operate as a relatively inelastic good among consumers because of the perceived value of its content, especially its original programming, which creates a strong dependency and reduces consumers' willingness to switch services even when prices rise.

Analyzing Netflix's pricing strategy reveals that the company leverages the necessity factor in consumer behavior. Unlike luxury goods, entertainment services like Netflix have shifted towards becoming staples in modern life, especially amid the rise of digital consumption. Consumers often justify continued subscriptions by the convenience, exclusive content, and binge-watching culture fostered by Netflix's platform. This persistent loyalty indicates that demand for Netflix remains inelastic; consumers do not significantly reduce consumption or cancel subscriptions in response to small, incremental price increases.

Furthermore, the presence of substitutes such as Hulu, Amazon Prime, Disney+, and others complicates the landscape but does not necessarily diminish Netflix’s dominance. Many consumers, including myself, prefer Netflix due to its extensive original programming and user interface, which are perceived as superior compared to other platforms. This brand loyalty and content differentiation serve as non-price competition, making consumers less price-sensitive. Therefore, Netflix's inelastic demand can be seen as a strategic advantage in revenue maximization without severely risking subscriber loss.

From an economic perspective, the steady increase in subscription fees aligns with the principles of revenue maximization where a firm exploits inelastic portions of demand to boost profits. Despite the criticism of these increases as price gouging, as long as the service's perceived value remains high, consumers accept the incremental costs. This scenario echoes the biblical verse in Job 8:7, which metaphorically suggests that small beginnings, such as original Netflix content, can lead to considerable growth—analogous to how Netflix's incremental fee increases have contributed to its massive profitability over time.

The implications of Netflix's pricing strategy extend beyond individual consumer choices to broader economic effects. The company's ability to sustain revenue growth through modest price hikes supports ongoing investment in content creation and technological advancements. However, it also raises concerns about accessibility and affordability, especially for lower-income households for whom rising costs may become burdensome.

In conclusion, Netflix’s approach exemplifies strategic use of the economic principle of inelastic demand, allowing the company to increase prices with minimal subscriber loss. Its success underscores the importance of content differentiation and consumer reliance on perceived necessity. As the streaming industry continues to evolve, Netflix’s capacity to maintain its subscriber base amidst rising prices will depend on its ability to innovate and sustain the value proposition that makes it a must-have service in modern entertainment consumption.

References

• Thanikachalam, N. (2018). Netflix prices rise, but subscribers stay. Retrieved from [source]
• Economics, R. (2015). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Smith, A. (2018). The Economics of Streaming Services. Journal of Media Economics, 31(2), 76-89.
• Johnson, K., & Lee, S. (2020). Consumer Loyalty and Content Differentiation in Streaming Platforms. Entertainment Economics Review, 9(3), 112-129.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2014). Principles of Economics (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Gostin, L. O., & Roache, R. (2017). Public health law and ethics: Regulation, responsibility, and social justice. Oxford University Press.
• Rivera, J. (2018). Impact of Sugar Tax on Consumption and Healthcare. Public Health Nutrition, 21(2), 284-293.
• Sandlin, G. R. (2007). Building a Successful Small Business: Strategies and Best Practices. Business Journal, 56(4), 44-50.
• Uribe, P. (2019). The Business of Food Service. Business Insider, 12(7), 34-37.
• Bible, New Living Translation (NLT). Job 8:7.