New Phone Inc. Has Five Divisions

New Phone Inc. A Diversified Manufacturer Has Five Divisions That Op

Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of New Phone Inc.'s control environment based on the case, and identify the factors within the control environment that have led to and facilitated Smith’s manipulation of inventory. Provide a brief overview of the case for a PowerPoint presentation with two or three slides, focusing on key points.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The case of New Phone Inc., a diversified manufacturing company with five divisions operating across the United States and Costa Rica, presents a complex control environment that influences the conduct of its managerial personnel. The company's decentralized structure, high management integrity, aggressive hiring practices, and weak internal controls create both strengths and vulnerabilities within its control environment. Analyzing these aspects provides insights into the factors that have enabled inappropriate inventory manipulation by the division manager, Cheryl Smith.

Strengths of New Phone Inc.’s Control Environment

  • High management integrity: The company’s management is described as having high integrity, which tends to promote ethical decision-making and foster a culture of honesty.
  • Autonomous divisional operations: The decentralization allows divisions to respond quickly to market changes and focus on their specific operational goals, potentially leading to increased innovation and flexibility.
  • Competent and aggressive hiring: The company emphasizes hiring capable individuals who are driven and performance-oriented, which can support operational excellence if properly monitored.
  • Performance-based compensation: Employee incentives tied to division profitability motivate managers and staff to meet financial targets.
  • Established corporate code of conduct: Although monitored minimally, having a code of conduct sets standards for expected behavior.

Weaknesses of New Phone Inc.’s Control Environment

  • Lack of active oversight from the board and audit committee: Limited monitoring allows unethical behavior to go unchecked and reduces accountability.
  • Absence of an internal audit department: Relying solely on external reviews leaves internal control weaknesses unaddressed and potentially exploitable.
  • Weak controls over inventory management: The reduction in inventory controls, combined with the use of periodic FIFO, increases susceptibility to manipulation.
  • Limited monitoring of employee compliance: Minimal oversight of adherence to policies facilitates risky or unethical actions.
  • Short-term focus on profitability: Emphasis on immediate division profits, especially through aggressive cost cutting, encourages risky fiscal practices.
  • Inadequate segregation of duties and checks-and-balances: The close link between division profitability and managerial compensation may incentivize manipulative behaviors.

Factors Facilitating Smith’s Inventory Manipulation

The control environment at New Phone Inc. has created conditions that have facilitated Cheryl Smith's decision to manipulate inventory accounts. Several factors stand out:

  • Weak internal controls over inventory: The division’s inventory controls are minimal, providing an opportunity for misstatement without detection.
  • Performance-based incentives: Smith's compensation is heavily tied to the division’s profitability, creating pressure to present favorable financial results.
  • Autonomous division operations: The decentralization reduces oversight and makes it easier for a division manager to undertake unethical practices without immediate external scrutiny.
  • Limited oversight from the board and audit committees: The lack of active monitoring diminishes the likelihood of oversight or intervention in financial irregularities.
  • Weak compliance monitoring: Little monitoring of employee behavior and adherence to policies enables manipulative actions to go unnoticed.
  • Short-term focus and aggressive cost management: The emphasis on quick profit improvements incentivizes short-term manipulations to meet targets, especially in a highly competitive environment.

Conclusion

The control environment at New Phone Inc. presents a mix of strengths, including a strong ethical foundation and performance incentives, but is significantly undermined by weak governance, minimal oversight, and insufficient internal controls. These weaknesses have created a setting conducive to unethical inventory manipulation, exemplified by Cheryl Smith’s intent to alter inventory figures temporarily to sustain profitability amid competitive pressures. Addressing these control deficiencies is critical to prevent future financial misconduct and ensure sustainable, ethical business practices.

References

  1. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Hermanson, D. R., & Raghunandan, K. (2011). Factors related to changes in internal control quality after SOX. Accounting Horizons, 25(3), 533-558.
  2. COSO (2013). Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
  3. Ghazinoory, S., Abdi, M., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2011). Corporate governance and internal control systems: An empirical study. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 9(4), 29-44.
  4. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press.
  5. Libby, T., & Thibodeau, J. (2014). Internal controls and ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 519-530.
  6. Moeller, R. R. (2013). Brink's Modern Internal Auditing. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Rubins, J. (2007). Role of internal control in financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(2), 227-253.
  8. Singleton, T., & Singleton, A. (2010). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Whittington, O. R. (2015). Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services. McGraw-Hill Education.
  10. Zhou, J. (2019). Corporate governance and financial misconduct: The role of internal controls. Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 378-399.

Related Assignments