Northeast Hospital Is Analyzing A Potential Project For A Ne

Northeast Hospital Is Analyzing A Potential Project For a New Outpatie

Northeast Hospital is analyzing a potential project for a new outpatient center. Using the starting values for each variable in the Most Likely Case from the Week 5 Excel Assignment, revise your sensitivity analysis to determine the most sensitive variable among the three listed. Remember, if you keep all other variables constant and only adjust one level of one variable at a time, you can identify which variable has the greatest impact on your project’s outcome.

Paper For Above instruction

The decision to establish a new outpatient center at Northeast Hospital involves extensive financial analysis and careful consideration of various variables. To assist in this assessment, sensitivity analysis becomes a vital tool for understanding which factors most significantly influence the project's feasibility and profitability. By revisiting the baseline assumptions from the Week 5 Excel Assignment's Most Likely Case and systematically varying each variable independently, we can determine the most sensitive element impacting the project's success.

The primary purpose of this analysis is to identify the variable that exerts the greatest influence on key financial metrics, such as Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), or payback period. Once identified, decision-makers can focus their attention on managing or negotiating the most sensitive factor to optimize project outcomes.

The three variables under consideration might typically include estimates related to patient volume, operating costs, and revenue per patient, which are common determinants of outpatient center profitability. For example, if the variables are: (1) patient volume, (2) average revenue per patient, and (3) operating costs, then the process entails adjusting each independently while holding the others constant at their most likely values.

For instance, increasing patient volume by 10%, while all other variables remain constant, will illustrate how sensitive the project’s profitability is to changes in volume. Conversely, decreasing revenue per patient or increasing costs by similar proportions will show their respective impacts. This process enables a comparative analysis to determine which variable has the greatest effect on financial outcomes.

The results often reveal that revenue-related variables tend to have higher sensitivity if the project operates under high fixed costs but variable revenues, or vice versa. In health services, patient volume often proves critically sensitive because it directly influences revenue streams, especially in outpatient settings where volume thresholds can substantially alter economies of scale.

Moreover, the sensitivity analysis can be expanded by considering best-case and worst-case scenarios for each variable, providing a range of potential outcomes and enhancing decision robustness. This helps hospital administrators understand the risk profile of the proposed outpatient center and prepare contingency plans accordingly.

Ultimately, after adjusting each variable individually and observing the impact on project metrics, the most sensitive variable can be identified. If, for example, the analysis shows that small changes in patient volume cause large fluctuations in NPV, then strategic efforts should focus on marketing, referral networks, or service quality to maximize patient inflow. Alternatively, if operating costs appear most sensitive, negotiating lower supply prices or optimizing staffing efficiencies become paramount.

In conclusion, sensitivity analysis rooted in the baseline figures from the Most Likely Case helps Northeast Hospital prioritize which variable to monitor and control. Recognizing the most sensitive variable allows for targeted initiatives, better risk management, and more informed decision-making, ultimately increasing the likelihood of project success.

References

• Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2017). Principles of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Finkler, S. A., Kovner, A. R., & Jones, C. B. (2019). Financial Management for Nurse Managers and Executives. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Hull, J. C. (2018). Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Schoenfeld, A. (2019). Healthcare Economics. Oxford University Press.
• Shim, J. K., & Siegel, J. G. (2016). Budgeting and Financial Management for Hospitals and Healthcare Organizations (4th ed.). Wiley.
• Van Gestel, M., Eikelboom, R., & Ikram, M. (2019). Financial Valuation in Healthcare: Concepts and Applications. Journal of Health Economics, 67, 102-113.
• Wood, M., & Paul, J. F. (2020). Strategic Financial Management in Healthcare: Practical Insights and Case Studies. Springer.