Not All The Items In Your Office Supply Store Are Evenly Dis

Not All The Items In Your Office Supply Store Are Evenly Distributed A

Not all the items in your office supply store are evenly distributed as far as demand is concerned, so you decide to forecast demand to help plan your stock. Past data for legal-sized yellow tablets for the month of August are Week 1 200 Week 2 300 Week 3 500 Week 4 600 a. Using a three-week moving average, what would you forecast the next week to be? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) Forecast for the week 5. b. Using exponential smoothing with α = 0.40, if the exponential forecast for week 3 was estimated as the average of the first two weeks [(200 + 300) / 2 = 250], what would you forecast week 5 to be? (Round your answer to the nearest whole number.) Forecast for the week 5.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Forecasting demand in retail and supply chain management plays a critical role in inventory control and ensuring customer satisfaction. Accurate demand forecasts enable a business to optimize stock levels, reduce shortages, and minimize excess inventory costs. Various techniques such as moving averages and exponential smoothing are frequently employed for short-term forecasting, especially when historical data is available. Analyzing the demand for legal-sized yellow tablets for August using these methods provides insights into their practical application and effectiveness in a retail setting.

Analysis Using a Three-Week Moving Average

The three-week moving average method involves calculating the average demand over the most recent three weeks to forecast the next period. Given the data for Weeks 1 through 4 as 200, 300, 500, and 600 respectively, the forecast for Week 5 can be derived by averaging the demands for Weeks 2, 3, and 4.

Mathematically:

Forecast for Week 5 = (Week 2 demand + Week 3 demand + Week 4 demand) / 3

= (300 + 500 + 600) / 3

= 1400 / 3

≈ 467 (rounded to the nearest whole number)

This simple averaging technique smooths out short-term fluctuations, providing a stable forecast that adapts to recent trends without overreacting to anomalies.

Analysis Using Exponential Smoothing

Exponential smoothing gives more weight to recent demand observations, which makes it a suitable method for capturing recent trends. The formula for exponential smoothing is:

Forecast for the next period = α × Actual demand in the current period + (1 - α) × Forecast for the current period

Given:

- α (alpha) = 0.40

- Initial forecast for Week 3 = 250 (average of Weeks 1 and 2: (200 + 300) / 2)

- Actual demand for Week 4 = 600

First, we update the forecast for Week 4:

Forecast for Week 4 = α × Demand Week 3 + (1 - α) × Forecast for Week 3

= 0.40 × 500 + 0.60 × 250

= 200 + 150

= 350

Similarly, to forecast for Week 5, we use the actual demand of Week 4:

Forecast for Week 5 = α × Demand Week 4 + (1 - α) × Forecast Week 4

= 0.40 × 600 + 0.60 × 350

= 240 + 210

= 450

Thus, the exponential smoothing forecast for Week 5 is approximately 450 units, which places recent high demand into the forecast, reflecting the upward trend in demand.

Discussion of Methodologies

Both forecasting methods have unique strengths and limitations. The three-week moving average smooths short-term fluctuations but may lag behind rapid demand changes, making it less responsive during sudden increases or decreases. Conversely, exponential smoothing assigns higher importance to recent data, allowing for more agile adjustments to changing demand patterns. Selecting the appropriate method depends on the business context and the variability of demand data.

The forecasted demand of 467 units using the moving average aligns closely with the exponential smoothing forecast of 450 units for Week 5. The slight difference stems from the weighting schemes and sensitivity to recent fluctuations. In practice, businesses often use a combination of methods or more sophisticated approaches like ARIMA for long-term planning, but simple techniques such as these are valuable for short-term operational decisions.

Conclusion

Forecasting demand is essential for effective inventory management, especially in retail environments with fluctuating demand patterns. The three-week moving average provides a stable forecast, suitable for stable demand environments, while exponential smoothing offers adaptability for demand with recent upward or downward trends. The calculated forecasts for Week 5—467 units using the moving average and 450 units using exponential smoothing—illustrate how different methods respond to past demand data. Retailers must consider their specific context, demand variability, and operational needs when choosing an appropriate forecasting technique.

References

  • Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts.
  • Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Chatfield, C. (2000). Time-series Forecasting. CRC Press.
  • SPSS Inc. (2017). Time Series Forecasting Using Exponential Smoothing. IBM Knowledge Center.
  • Sharpe, D. (2015). Forecasting with Exponential Smoothing Techniques. Journal of Business Forecasting, 34(2), 23-29.
  • Robinson, M., & Farris, P. (2017). Demand Forecasting in Retail. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(3), 45-57.
  • Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2014). Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers. Wiley.
  • Makridakis, S., & Camria, R. (1988). The Accuracy of Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.
  • Holt, C. C. (2004). Forecasting Demand with Exponential Smoothing. Supply Chain Review, 12(4), 20-25.
  • Gardner, E. S. (1985). Exponential Smoothing: The State of the Art. Journal of Forecasting, 4(1), 1-28.

Related Assignments