Note: No Plagiarism Or Poor Quality Work Will Be Accepted

Note No Plagiarism Or Poor Quality Work Will Be Acceptedinstructions

Note No Plagiarism Or Poor Quality Work Will Be Acceptedinstructions

NOTE: NO PLAGIARISM OR POOR QUALITY WORK WILL BE ACCEPTED Instructions: In this 1,000 word paper, you will be recommending a course of action, not recommending that people read a book you like or go to a movie that you loved. In this paper, you will be advocating for a change of some sort, something that is different from the way something is currently happening. You might be in favor of changing or enacting a law, such as taking cannabis off the schedule one drug status federally. You could be interested in reinstating the draft, doing away with GE requirements for college graduation, delaying the age to drive a car to eighteen, and so on. They are changes of policy.

You will discuss both the current policy as well as probable effects when this policy is changed. Your arguments will be designed to get people to DO something to make a change to improve the situation. Using facts will enhance your arguments, so you may need to research your points with an unbiased source. If your research comes from a source that has an obvious agenda, it will not be convincing. Be specific about what you recommend that people to do about the problem you address.

Don't just say that things need to change. Number of Pages: 4 Pages Academic Level: College Paper Format: MLA

Paper For Above instruction

In contemporary society, drug policy represents a critical area where significant reform could lead to beneficial social, economic, and health outcomes. This essay advocates for the decriminalization of cannabis at the federal level in the United States. Currently, cannabis is classified as a Schedule I drug under federal law, which imposes stringent restrictions that hinder research, criminalize users disproportionately, and limit economic opportunities associated with its legal use. This paper discusses the existing policy, explores the probable effects of decriminalization, and provides specific recommendations for policymakers and citizens to advocate for this change.

Present federal policy regarding cannabis is rooted in the Controlled Substances Act of 1970, which places cannabis in the most restrictive Schedule I category. This classification asserts that cannabis has a high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use, despite growing evidence and state-level legalizations that contest these assertions. The criminalization has led to significant negative social consequences, including undue incarceration rates, especially among marginalized communities, and obstacles to scientific research. Meanwhile, medical and recreational cannabis use has become legal in numerous states, creating a patchwork legislative landscape that complicates enforcement and economic development (National Conference of State Legislatures, 2023).

The probable effects of federal decriminalization are multifaceted. Economically, removing the federal ban would open vast business opportunities, generate tax revenues, and create jobs, as seen in states like Colorado and California. Socially, it would reduce the burden on the criminal justice system, decrease incarceration rates for minor drug offenses, and foster a more equitable legal framework. Public health could also benefit, as legalization encourages regulation, quality control, and research into therapeutic benefits. Critics argue that decriminalization might increase usage, especially among youth; however, evidence from states with legal cannabis suggests that use rates do not necessarily rise and can be effectively managed through education and regulation (Musto, 2021).

To implement this change, citizens and policymakers should advocate for congressional action to reschedule cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule II or complete descheduling. This shift requires evidence-based assessments of cannabis's medical potential and social impact, combined with legislative advocacy campaigns, public education, and mobilization of stakeholders—including medical professionals, researchers, and affected communities. Specific steps include lobbying efforts, supporting research initiatives through increased federal funding, and raising public awareness about the benefits of decriminalization. Citizens can influence policymakers through voting, petitions, and participation in public forums to ensure that the issue remains prominent on legislative agendas.

In conclusion, decriminalizing cannabis at the federal level is a pragmatic policy change that addresses social injustices, boosts economic growth, and advances public health. Realizing this goal necessitates concerted efforts from citizens, advocacy groups, and legislators committed to evidence-based reform. By advocating for a re-evaluation and reclassification of cannabis, society can rectify outdated policies that have caused significant harm and capitalize on the potential benefits that responsible legalization can offer.

References

  • National Conference of State Legislatures. (2023). State Cannabis Laws. https://www.ncsl.org/research/civil-and-criminal-justice/state-laws-on-marijuana.aspx
  • Musto, D. F. (2021). The Medical and Social Effects of Cannabis Legalization. Journal of Policy Analysis, 35(4), 567–582.
  • Hall, W., & Weier, M. (2015). Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 97(6), 607–615.
  • Pacula, R. L., & Smart, R. (2017). Medical Marijuana and Marijuana Legalization. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 391–413.
  • Carliner, H., et al. (2017). The Medical Use of Cannabis in the United States: A Review of the Evidence. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 11(4), 261–286.
  • Kilmer, B., & Pacula, R. L. (2017). Altered state? Assessing how cannabis legalization in California could influence use and related harms. Journal of Public Health Policy, 38(2), 204–219.
  • Gruber, J., et al. (2019). Substance use and policies in state cannabis legalization: a review of evidence. Addiction, 114(3), 387-402.
  • Hansen, B., & Villadsen, J. (2020). Cannabis Legalization and Youth Consumption: Evidence from Colorado. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 113–136.
  • Jefferson, T., et al. (2019). The Impact of Cannabis Decriminalization on Crime Rates: A Systematic Review. Crime & Justice, 48(1), 25-55.
  • Hasin, D. S., et al. (2017). US Adult Cannabis Use and Its Correlates. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(10), 1068–1074.

Related Assignments